Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 doctest failures on x86 openSUSE 11.0

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Minh Nguyen

unread,
Sep 22, 2009, 2:46:38 AM9/22/09
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
Hi folks,

Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:

****** doctest failures on 32-bit openSUSE 11.0 ******

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",
line 3940:
sage: x.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",
line 4849:
sage: s.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",
line 1976:
sage: m.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************
3 items had failures:
1 of 4 in __main__.example_128
1 of 5 in __main__.example_165
1 of 5 in __main__.example_48
***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file
/student/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_pbori.py
[4.4 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx",
line 1013:
sage: B.nonlinearity()
Expected:
222
Got:
217
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 6 in __main__.example_36
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file
/student/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_boolean_function.py
[3.5 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py",
line 567:
sage: repr(gp(10.^80)).replace(gp._exponent_symbol(), 'e')
Expected nothing
Got:
'1.000000000000000000000000000e80'
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 4 in __main__.example_26
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file
/student/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_gp.py
[2.7 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/data/students/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py",
line 1599:
sage: gp(10.^80)._sage_repr()
Expected nothing
Got:
'1.000000000000000000000000000e80'
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 3 in __main__.example_45
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file
/student/pg/s3599415/scratch/upgrade-farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_expect.py
[12.0 s]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following tests failed:


sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
Total time for all tests: 6701.6 seconds

These are exactly the same failures as those reported at sage-devel
[1] for 32-bit OS X 10.5.8 on bsd.math.

[1] http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/954ecbadeb7676a8

--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen

Minh Nguyen

unread,
Sep 22, 2009, 5:46:20 AM9/22/09
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
> 11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:
>
> ****** doctest failures on 32-bit openSUSE 11.0 ******

Builds OK on x86_64 openSUSE 11.1 (menas on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1,
but I replaced the cliquer package with that at ticket #6681 [1]. All
doctests pass.

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6681

Minh Nguyen

unread,
Sep 23, 2009, 3:34:10 AM9/23/09
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
> 11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:

Compiles OK on opensuse32 VM guest on boxen.math, i.e. 32-bit openSUSE
11.1. The following doctests fail:

{{{


sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",


line 3940:
sage: x.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",


line 4849:
sage: s.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx",


line 1976:
sage: m.stable_hash()
Expected:
173100285919
Got:
-845955105
**********************************************************************
3 items had failures:
1 of 4 in __main__.example_128
1 of 5 in __main__.example_165
1 of 5 in __main__.example_48
***Test Failed*** 3 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file

/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_pbori.py
[5.7 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx"
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx",


line 1013:
sage: B.nonlinearity()
Expected:
222
Got:
217
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 6 in __main__.example_36
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file

/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_boolean_function.py
[3.9 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py",


line 567:
sage: repr(gp(10.^80)).replace(gp._exponent_symbol(), 'e')
Expected nothing
Got:
'1.000000000000000000000000000e80'
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 4 in __main__.example_26
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file

/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_gp.py
[3.3 s]

<SNIP>

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
**********************************************************************

File "/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py",


line 1599:
sage: gp(10.^80)._sage_repr()
Expected nothing
Got:
'1.000000000000000000000000000e80'
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 3 in __main__.example_45
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file

/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_expect.py
[14.4 s]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following tests failed:


sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"

Total time for all tests: 7221.4 seconds

Minh Nguyen

unread,
Sep 23, 2009, 3:36:45 AM9/23/09
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
> 11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:

Builds fine on opensuse64 VM guest on boxen.math, i.e. x86_64 openSUSE
11.1. All doctests pass.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages