Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Improve the autotools spkg (#13557) needs review
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jeroen Demeyer  
View profile  
 More options Oct 3 2012, 3:27 pm
From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 21:27:43 +0200
Local: Wed, Oct 3 2012 3:27 pm
Subject: Improve the autotools spkg (#13557) needs review
I have made a lot of fixes to my autotools spkg, essentially improving
it from a "proof of concept" to a "real" spkg.  For this reason, I would
like to move the package from experimental to optional.

The main change is that the package now ships an auto-generated Makefile
to build the various different versions of autotools, with correct
dependencies (e.g. autoconf-2.62 depends on automake-1.10).  This made
the packaging process a lot more involved, but the spkg-install is much
simplified (it essentially just executes make).

I added Texinfo to the package, since that's a prerequisite and it's
also often used for bootstrapping packages, so it fits with the theme.

There are also a lot of small fixes to make the package more portable,
it no longer requires GNU-specific tools.  Indeed, it now builds on all
buildbot systems that I tried (sage, rosemary, iras, bsd, moufang, mark,
hawk).

Please review this *optional* package:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13557

Thanks,
Jeroen.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeroen Demeyer  
View profile  
 More options Dec 18 2012, 8:15 am
From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:15:15 +0100
Local: Tues, Dec 18 2012 8:15 am
Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Improve the autotools spkg (#13557) needs review
Could somebody please review this optional package? I think it's a
useful improvement over the old autotools spkg.

On 2012-10-03 21:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »