Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Boy Scouts Vote To Allow Gays
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Rob Wall
May 24, 2013, 2:33:27 PM5/24/13
to
In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47...@216.196.121.131>
Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> May 23 2013
>
> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> to 475 no.
>
> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
The delegates ignored the historical membership of the boyscouts
which opposed the action by a 2 to 1 margin.
Faggots should all be put to death.
Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> May 23 2013
>
> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> to 475 no.
>
> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
The delegates ignored the historical membership of the boyscouts
which opposed the action by a 2 to 1 margin.
Faggots should all be put to death.
Jeanne Douglas
May 24, 2013, 11:02:26 PM5/24/13
to
In article
<8810f35b62388b5d...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
Why?
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
<8810f35b62388b5d...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>,
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
harry
May 25, 2013, 1:34:54 AM5/25/13
to
On May 24, 7:33 pm, "Rob Wall" <rob.w...@msn.com> wrote:
> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>
We need a pill to cure them. But their deviant behaviour should not be
encouraged.
> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>
encouraged.
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 3:38:53 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpqff$h7d$1...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:30 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> In article <hGVnt.29044$JB5....@newsfe26.iad>,
> >> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> pongespob wrote:
> >>>> On May 24, 9:20 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Everyone is born an atheist until some get their mind filled with
> >>>> the bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >>>> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >>>> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >>>> pressure.
> >>>
> >>> If that helps you sleep at night the run with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> So you're claiming that babies believe in god?
> >
> > Wow you read a lot between the lines, all imaginary but lots all the same
> >
> > I am claiming that you are free to believe what you want to believe.
> > However that doesn't mean you are free to belittle my beliefs or shove yours
> > down my throat
> >
> > The world would be much happier if everyone would quit trying to force
> > others to believe as they do.
> >
> > Try it, you might find yourself happier
> >
> Atheist do not try to force our non-belief on anyone as doing so would
> be impossible.
Liar. Atheists attempt to force legislate their beliefs on
everyone.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:30 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> In article <hGVnt.29044$JB5....@newsfe26.iad>,
> >> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> pongespob wrote:
> >>>> On May 24, 9:20 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Everyone is born an atheist until some get their mind filled with
> >>>> the bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >>>> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >>>> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >>>> pressure.
> >>>
> >>> If that helps you sleep at night the run with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> So you're claiming that babies believe in god?
> >
> > Wow you read a lot between the lines, all imaginary but lots all the same
> >
> > I am claiming that you are free to believe what you want to believe.
> > However that doesn't mean you are free to belittle my beliefs or shove yours
> > down my throat
> >
> > The world would be much happier if everyone would quit trying to force
> > others to believe as they do.
> >
> > Try it, you might find yourself happier
> >
> Atheist do not try to force our non-belief on anyone as doing so would
> be impossible.
Liar. Atheists attempt to force legislate their beliefs on
everyone.
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 4:13:00 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpp50$7t5$6...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:08 PM, PV wrote:
> > harry wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>
> >>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are
> >>>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>> accept atheists.
> >>
> >> The BSA is not religious.
> >> It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service in the
> >> imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >
> > Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the promise and
> > the law
> >
> > He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> > activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >
> The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) was not invented by Baden-Powell
> though his influence was significant.
He didn't influence little boys to scout each other's assholes.
> <home.repair and free.usenet snipped>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:08 PM, PV wrote:
> > harry wrote:
> >> On May 24, 3:02 pm, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote
> >>> innews:ROJnt.18392$nm....@newsfe14.iad:
> >>> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>
> >>>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>
> >>>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>
> >>>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>
> >>>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>
> >>>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>
> >>>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are
> >>>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>>
> >>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>
> >>> The BSA is per se a religious institution
> >>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>
> >>> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>> accept atheists.
> >>
> >> The BSA is not religious.
> >> It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service in the
> >> imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >
> > Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the promise and
> > the law
> >
> > He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> > activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >
> The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) was not invented by Baden-Powell
> though his influence was significant.
He didn't influence little boys to scout each other's assholes.
> <home.repair and free.usenet snipped>
Message has been deleted
Free Lunch
May 25, 2013, 4:59:41 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 21:38:53 +0200, "Benghazi Boons" <afr...@jigs.za>
wrote in alt.atheism:
Provide one example.
wrote in alt.atheism:
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 5:23:29 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpq0b$e35$3...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:20:46 -0600, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>
> >>>>
> >>>> Did the moron "choose" not to believe in Santa Claus?
> >>>
> >>> Well another educated response........not
> >>>
> >>> Please explain where the lie is?
> >>
> >> A person cannot CHOOSE to believe or not believe.
> >>
> >> If I ordered you to believe in leprechauns, could you do it?
> >
> > Wow you really believe that people CAN'T choose what to believe? Your faith
> > in people is pretty shallow if that is true.
> >
> > Ordering me to believe is not offering a choice, last time I looked in
> > Canada, there is nothing ordering me to believe or not to believe.
> >
> > Many people are raised in a religion who go on to choose to reject those
> > beliefs and replace them with their own so did they not consciously choose
> > to believe in something other then what they were raised with?
> >
> No they did not. They simply rejected theistic belief without
> replacing them.
Oh? And who made that decision?
> If someone invites you to a party and you decline (reject) the
> invitation, must you find another party to go to?
Incorrect analogy. Fail.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:25 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> In article <ctSnt.41060$KM4....@newsfe25.iad>,
> On 5/24/2013 10:25 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>> Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:20:46 -0600, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet another stupid, nasty, lying theist.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Did the moron "choose" not to believe in Santa Claus?
> >>>
> >>> Well another educated response........not
> >>>
> >>> Please explain where the lie is?
> >>
> >> A person cannot CHOOSE to believe or not believe.
> >>
> >> If I ordered you to believe in leprechauns, could you do it?
> >
> > Wow you really believe that people CAN'T choose what to believe? Your faith
> > in people is pretty shallow if that is true.
> >
> > Ordering me to believe is not offering a choice, last time I looked in
> > Canada, there is nothing ordering me to believe or not to believe.
> >
> > Many people are raised in a religion who go on to choose to reject those
> > beliefs and replace them with their own so did they not consciously choose
> > to believe in something other then what they were raised with?
> >
> No they did not. They simply rejected theistic belief without
> replacing them.
Oh? And who made that decision?
> If someone invites you to a party and you decline (reject) the
> invitation, must you find another party to go to?
Incorrect analogy. Fail.
Free Lunch
May 25, 2013, 5:33:35 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 23:23:29 +0200, "Benghazi Boons" <afr...@jigs.za>
wrote in alt.atheism:
Apparently the people who rejected their family's religion.
>> If someone invites you to a party and you decline (reject) the
>> invitation, must you find another party to go to?
>
>Incorrect analogy. Fail.
Is there any religion that can show that it is valid?
wrote in alt.atheism:
>> If someone invites you to a party and you decline (reject) the
>> invitation, must you find another party to go to?
>
>Incorrect analogy. Fail.
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 7:45:35 PM5/25/13
to
In article <_K-dnT_sZbXj7T3M...@westnet.com.au>
dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 25/05/13 5:54 PM, Dakota wrote:
> >>>> pongespob wrote:
> Barry OGrady whose involvement as OVER 10 YEARS of compulsive intrusions
> within the group to the exclusion of other Christians might constitute
> "force our non-belief on anyone".
>
> Therefore your statement above is false
His statements are always false. They're contrived to be false.
>
> > We only belittle those who lie about us and try to force their beliefs
> > on us.
> >
> > I do agree that the world would be much happier if everyone would quit
> >
> > Try it, you might find yourself happier. The rest of certainly would be.
> >
> >
dolf <dolf...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 25/05/13 5:54 PM, Dakota wrote:
> > On 5/24/2013 10:30 PM, PV wrote:
> >> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>> In article <hGVnt.29044$JB5....@newsfe26.iad>,
> >> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>> pongespob wrote:
> >>>>> On May 24, 9:20 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>>>>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Everyone is born an atheist until some get their mind filled with
> >>>>> the bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >>>>> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >>>>> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >>>>> pressure.
> >>>>
> >>>> If that helps you sleep at night the run with it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So you're claiming that babies believe in god?
> >>
> >> Wow you read a lot between the lines, all imaginary but lots all the same
> >>
> >> I am claiming that you are free to believe what you want to believe.
> >> However that doesn't mean you are free to belittle my beliefs or shove
> >> yours
> >> down my throat
> >>
> >> The world would be much happier if everyone would quit trying to force
> >> others to believe as they do.
> >>
> >> Try it, you might find yourself happier
> >>
> > Atheist do not try to force our non-belief on anyone as doing so would
> > be impossible.
> >
>
> If you go to aus.religion.christian there you will find an atheist named
> >>>>> the bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >>>>> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >>>>> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >>>>> pressure.
> >>>>
> >>>> If that helps you sleep at night the run with it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So you're claiming that babies believe in god?
> >>
> >> Wow you read a lot between the lines, all imaginary but lots all the same
> >>
> >> I am claiming that you are free to believe what you want to believe.
> >> However that doesn't mean you are free to belittle my beliefs or shove
> >> yours
> >> down my throat
> >>
> >> The world would be much happier if everyone would quit trying to force
> >> others to believe as they do.
> >>
> >> Try it, you might find yourself happier
> >>
> > Atheist do not try to force our non-belief on anyone as doing so would
> > be impossible.
> >
>
> Barry OGrady whose involvement as OVER 10 YEARS of compulsive intrusions
> within the group to the exclusion of other Christians might constitute
> "force our non-belief on anyone".
>
> Therefore your statement above is false
His statements are always false. They're contrived to be false.
>
> > We only belittle those who lie about us and try to force their beliefs
> > on us.
> >
> > I do agree that the world would be much happier if everyone would quit
> > trying to force others to believe as they do.
> >
> > I can't wait for theists to accept that concept.
> >
> >
> > Try it, you might find yourself happier. The rest of certainly would be.
> >
> >
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 7:45:24 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpqre$h7d$3...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47...@216.196.121.131>,
> >
> > So the only reason to discriminate against Spirituality is.......?
> >
> > The Scouting movement has had a Christian base from the beginning, read
> > Scouting for Boys if you don't believe me. So why should it change it's
> > belief structure because some don't like it.
> >
> > The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few....or the one.
> >
> We're not trying to change it. We're simply pointing out that bigotry
> in all its forms is disgusting.
>
> The equal rights of one person outweigh the bigotry of the many.
Faggots have equal rights. They are attempting to curtail the
equal rights of those who disagree with their cultist pedophile
behavior.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:33 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> In article <ROJnt.18392$nm....@newsfe14.iad>,
> On 5/24/2013 10:33 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>>>
> >>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> >>>>> lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>
> >>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>>
> >>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are
> >>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>>>
> >>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> >>>>> lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>
> >>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>>
> >>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are
> >>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>>
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >> Because the only reason to discriminate against atheists is bigotry.
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >
> > So the only reason to discriminate against Spirituality is.......?
> >
> > The Scouting movement has had a Christian base from the beginning, read
> > Scouting for Boys if you don't believe me. So why should it change it's
> > belief structure because some don't like it.
> >
> > The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few....or the one.
> >
> We're not trying to change it. We're simply pointing out that bigotry
> in all its forms is disgusting.
>
> The equal rights of one person outweigh the bigotry of the many.
Faggots have equal rights. They are attempting to curtail the
equal rights of those who disagree with their cultist pedophile
behavior.
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 8:20:29 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpp8p$c31$1...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >> moral than theists.
> >
> > Ummmm sure, however basing conclusions on an anonymous newsgroup with so few
> > participants and so many trolls will surely skew the results severely
> >
> That was taken into consideration by JD's parenthetical clarification.
So you both get zero, hunh?
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:21 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> In article <VpSnt.5897$OS5...@newsfe24.iad>,
> On 5/24/2013 10:21 PM, PV wrote:
> > Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>>> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote
> >>>>> innews:ROJnt.18392$nm....@newsfe14.iad:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>>>>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts
> >>>>>>> are still a bigoted organization.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why
> >>>>>> must Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>>>> May 23 2013
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>>>> to 475 no.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>>>>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts
> >>>>>>> are still a bigoted organization.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why
> >>>>>> must Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The BSA is per se a religious institution
> >>>>> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>>>> accept atheists.
> >>>>
> >>>> The BSA is not religious.
> >>>> It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service in
> >>>> the imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >>>
> >>> Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the
> >>> promise and the law
> >>>
> >>> He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> >>> activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >>
> >> And atheists, based on what we see here on this group, are far more
> >>>>> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>>>> accept atheists.
> >>>>
> >>>> The BSA is not religious.
> >>>> It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service in
> >>>> the imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >>>
> >>> Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the
> >>> promise and the law
> >>>
> >>> He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> >>> activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >>
> >> moral than theists.
> >
> > Ummmm sure, however basing conclusions on an anonymous newsgroup with so few
> > participants and so many trolls will surely skew the results severely
> >
> That was taken into consideration by JD's parenthetical clarification.
So you both get zero, hunh?
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 8:56:00 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpqv6$h7d$4...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > In article <doidnan5qZIxOQLM...@earthlink.com>,
> > Kurt Ullman <kurtu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <al8vp893f355osj2p...@4ax.com>,
> >> Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:46:29 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtu...@yahoo.com>
> >>>
> >>> No, that is not what atheism is. Atheism is the lack of belief in any
> >>> gods.
> >> Yeah, you don't believe in gods. A lack of belief, by definition, is
> >> not believing.
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
> > What it is not is a belief that no god exists.
> >
> >
> >>> Let's go back to the valid definition of atheism, the lack of belief in
> >>> any gods. Where does that require evidence that any particular god does
> >>> not exist?
> >>
> >> How does it do anything but? YOu are saying there are no gods.
> >
> > Not true.
> >
> >
> >> Lack of gods mean they don't exist or there would be a god or two
> >> floating around. I did not say anything about a particular god (thus the
> >> lower case "g" to keep my high school English teachers happy-grin).
> >> Until you can prove that there are no gods to believe, atheism is just
> >> the mirror image of theism (with their own brand of fundamentalism).
> >
> > But the vast majority of us DO NOT believe that god doesn't exist.
> >
> > What it is is the lack of a reason TO believe.
> >
> > Can you answer the question nobody else has been able to answer: WHY
> > should we believe that any god exists?
> >
>
> He's deceitfully trying to equate 'lack of belief in any god' with
> 'lack of god'.
You haven't exactly been challenging Einstein today either,
bunky.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 10:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > In article <doidnan5qZIxOQLM...@earthlink.com>,
> > Kurt Ullman <kurtu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <al8vp893f355osj2p...@4ax.com>,
> >> Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:46:29 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtu...@yahoo.com>
> >>>
> >>> No, that is not what atheism is. Atheism is the lack of belief in any
> >>> gods.
> >> Yeah, you don't believe in gods. A lack of belief, by definition, is
> >> not believing.
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
> > What it is not is a belief that no god exists.
> >
> >
> >>> Let's go back to the valid definition of atheism, the lack of belief in
> >>> any gods. Where does that require evidence that any particular god does
> >>> not exist?
> >>
> >> How does it do anything but? YOu are saying there are no gods.
> >
> > Not true.
> >
> >
> >> Lack of gods mean they don't exist or there would be a god or two
> >> floating around. I did not say anything about a particular god (thus the
> >> lower case "g" to keep my high school English teachers happy-grin).
> >> Until you can prove that there are no gods to believe, atheism is just
> >> the mirror image of theism (with their own brand of fundamentalism).
> >
> > But the vast majority of us DO NOT believe that god doesn't exist.
> >
> > What it is is the lack of a reason TO believe.
> >
> > Can you answer the question nobody else has been able to answer: WHY
> > should we believe that any god exists?
> >
>
> He's deceitfully trying to equate 'lack of belief in any god' with
> 'lack of god'.
You haven't exactly been challenging Einstein today either,
bunky.
Nancy Pelosi Baltimore Transvestite
May 25, 2013, 10:06:42 PM5/25/13
to
In article <e8Znt.10311$kF....@newsfe30.iad>
> > On May 25, 3:18 am, pongespob <pongespob_paresqua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > the ignorant.
> > It dwells on the (shrinking) island of ignorance.
>
> Apparently from your posts here, your island is expanding at a great rate.
harry's anus is expanding at a greatrate.
> > On May 25, 3:18 am, pongespob <pongespob_paresqua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On May 24, 9:20 am, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >> Everyone is born an atheist until some get their mind filled with the
> >> bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >> pressure.
> >
> > Religion is to do with an organisation that make money and power from
> >> bullshit of religion. Religion is the choice to ignore reason in
> >> deference to ancient fairy tales for the sole reason that a lot of
> >> other people do with no justification whatsoever other than social
> >> pressure.
> >
> > the ignorant.
> > It dwells on the (shrinking) island of ignorance.
>
> Apparently from your posts here, your island is expanding at a great rate.
harry's anus is expanding at a greatrate.
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 11:53:38 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knpprc$e35$2...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:11 PM, PV wrote:
> > Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:20:46 -0600, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>
> the default state for humans. Everyone is born an atheist.
Just like everyone is born a faggot, right? The things deluded
atheists believe...
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:11 PM, PV wrote:
> > Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:20:46 -0600, "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >> Yet another stupid, nasty, lying theist.
> >>
> >> Did the moron "choose" not to believe in Santa Claus?
> >
> > Well another educated response........not
> >
> > Please explain where the lie is?
> >
>
> The lie is that you claimed that atheism is a choice. It is, in fact,
> >>
> >> Did the moron "choose" not to believe in Santa Claus?
> >
> > Well another educated response........not
> >
> > Please explain where the lie is?
> >
>
> the default state for humans. Everyone is born an atheist.
Just like everyone is born a faggot, right? The things deluded
atheists believe...
Benghazi Boons
May 25, 2013, 11:54:01 PM5/25/13
to
In article <knppb5$c31$2...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 11:27 PM, Attila Iskander wrote:
> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hlwdjsd2-3CD285...@news.giganews.com...
> >> In article <VpSnt.5897$OS5...@newsfe24.iad>,
> > Too bad that in recent history, so-called atheists have ended up with
> > the blood of more innocent people in a single century, than can be
> > ascribed to theists during the know history of man.
> >
> At least that's what theists tell themselves.
Look at your boy Obama. He's killed more people than Bush.
He's a muslim, which in the grand scheme of things is the same
thing as an atheist. Islam was founded by a child molester, the
atheist religion promotes the legalization of gay perversions
and child molesting.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 11:27 PM, Attila Iskander wrote:
> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hlwdjsd2-3CD285...@news.giganews.com...
> >> In article <VpSnt.5897$OS5...@newsfe24.iad>,
> >>> >> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote
> >>> >> innews:ROJnt.18392$nm....@newsfe14.iad:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>> >>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>> >>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>> >>>>> May 23 2013
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>> >>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>> >>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>> >>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>> >>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>> >>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>> >>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>> >>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>> >>>>> to 475 no.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>> >>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts
> >>> are
> >>> >>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >>> >>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>> >>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>> Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>> >>>>> May 23 2013
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>> GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>> >>>>> Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>> >>>>> kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>> >>>>> popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>> >>>>> guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>> >>>>> Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>> >>>>> delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>> >>>>> BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>> >>>>> to 475 no.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-t
> >>> >>>>> o- lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts
> >>> are
> >>> >>>> still a bigoted organization.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why
> >>> must
> >>> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>> >>
> >>> must
> >>> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The BSA is per se a religious institution
> >>> >> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>> >> accept atheists.
> >>> >
> >>> > The BSA is not religious.
> >>> > It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service
> >>> in the
> >>> > imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >>>
> >>> Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the
> >>> promise and
> >>> the law
> >>>
> >>> He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> >>> activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >>
> >> And atheists, based on what we see here on this group, are far more
> >> moral than theists.
> >>
> >
> > At least that's what atheists tell themselves
> >>> >> so I don't know how they could be forced to
> >>> >> accept atheists.
> >>> >
> >>> > The BSA is not religious.
> >>> > It was invented in the UK primarily to prepare boys for service
> >>> in the
> >>> > imperial British army though it has changed since then.
> >>>
> >>> Baden Powell emphasized God throughout his writing including the
> >>> promise and
> >>> the law
> >>>
> >>> He also intend Scouting to develop good citizens from youth throught
> >>> activities and learning, teaching them to prefer service before self.
> >>
> >> And atheists, based on what we see here on this group, are far more
> >> moral than theists.
> >>
> >
> > Too bad that in recent history, so-called atheists have ended up with
> > the blood of more innocent people in a single century, than can be
> > ascribed to theists during the know history of man.
> >
> At least that's what theists tell themselves.
Look at your boy Obama. He's killed more people than Bush.
He's a muslim, which in the grand scheme of things is the same
thing as an atheist. Islam was founded by a child molester, the
atheist religion promotes the legalization of gay perversions
and child molesting.
Benghazi Boons
May 26, 2013, 12:29:22 AM5/26/13
to
In article <knppm6$e35$1...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:10 PM, PV wrote:
> > linuxgal wrote:
> >> like those country clubs that only accept whites.
> >
> > I have never seen a family denied membership from Scouting because they are
> > atheists. However I have witnessed atheists join and then demand the
> > removal of all references to God. Sorry but the organization has a
> > spirtiual aspect to it, if that does not fit your choices, too bad.
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_membership_controversies
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/r3npo
So what?
Atheists know the rules before they join, and they deliberately
prostitute their children to attack the Christian religion.
Since America was founded by Christians, maybe the atheists
should just pack up and move before they get killed.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2013 6:10 PM, PV wrote:
> > linuxgal wrote:
> >> PV wrote:
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >> They ought to change, they are not required to change. It's sort of
> >>> Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is, so why must
> >>> Scouts change to accommodate those that choose atheism?
> >>
> >> like those country clubs that only accept whites.
> >
> > I have never seen a family denied membership from Scouting because they are
> > atheists. However I have witnessed atheists join and then demand the
> > removal of all references to God. Sorry but the organization has a
> > spirtiual aspect to it, if that does not fit your choices, too bad.
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_membership_controversies
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/r3npo
So what?
Atheists know the rules before they join, and they deliberately
prostitute their children to attack the Christian religion.
Since America was founded by Christians, maybe the atheists
should just pack up and move before they get killed.
Jeanne Douglas
May 26, 2013, 1:16:09 AM5/26/13
to
Benghazi Boons
May 26, 2013, 2:14:22 AM5/26/13
to
In article <knpql7$h7d$2...@dont-email.me>
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> Apparently the "historical membership" - whatever that means - failed
> to vote in the recent election.
Perhaps they were denied the opportunity of a vote.
Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> to vote in the recent election.
Perhaps they were denied the opportunity of a vote.
Jerry
May 26, 2013, 5:10:15 AM5/26/13
to
In article <78717044-ce9a-4caf-a2f5-
308639...@o10g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
harry <harry...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> On May 24, 6:34�pm, Kurt Ullman <kurtull...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In article <al8vp893f355osj2pj5ruk4a9imo6be...@4ax.com>,
> > �Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:46:29 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtull...@yahoo.com>
>
> You might apply that statement to the tooth fairy.
>
> Or the flat earth.
Or the fact that atheism is a religion.
> God belief is just a con.
God disbelief is a con, but it doesn't rake in as much money and
it will eventually get you killed when you piss off the
Christians.
> Why this con is not illegal as are other cons is beyond me.
Men fucking each other up the ass was illegal until enough
democrat politicians who liked it decided to decriminalize it.
308639...@o10g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
harry <harry...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> On May 24, 6:34�pm, Kurt Ullman <kurtull...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In article <al8vp893f355osj2pj5ruk4a9imo6be...@4ax.com>,
> > �Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:46:29 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtull...@yahoo.com>
> >
> > > No, that is not what atheism is. Atheism is the lack of belief in any
> > > gods.
> >
> > � �Yeah, you don't believe in gods. A lack of belief, by definition,
> is
> > not believing.
> >
> > > No, that is not what atheism is. Atheism is the lack of belief in any
> > > gods.
> >
> > � �Yeah, you don't believe in gods. A lack of belief, by definition,
> is
> > not believing.
> >
> > > Let's go back to the valid definition of atheism, the lack of belief in
> > > any gods. Where does that require evidence that any particular god does
> > > not exist?
> >
> > � � � �How does it do anything but? YOu are saying there are no g
> ods.
> > > any gods. Where does that require evidence that any particular god does
> > > not exist?
> >
> > � � � �How does it do anything but? YOu are saying there are no g
> ods.
> > Lack of gods mean they don't exist or there would be a god or two
> > floating around. I did not say anything about a particular god (thus the
> > lower case "g" to keep my high school English teachers happy-grin).
> > Until you can prove that there are no gods to believe, atheism is just
> > the mirror image of theism (with their own brand of fundamentalism).
> > --
> > floating around. I did not say anything about a particular god (thus the
> > lower case "g" to keep my high school English teachers happy-grin).
> > Until you can prove that there are no gods to believe, atheism is just
> > the mirror image of theism (with their own brand of fundamentalism).
>
> You might apply that statement to the tooth fairy.
>
> Or the flat earth.
Or the fact that atheism is a religion.
> God belief is just a con.
God disbelief is a con, but it doesn't rake in as much money and
it will eventually get you killed when you piss off the
Christians.
> Why this con is not illegal as are other cons is beyond me.
Men fucking each other up the ass was illegal until enough
democrat politicians who liked it decided to decriminalize it.
Jeanne Douglas
May 26, 2013, 7:17:26 AM5/26/13
to
Tom McDonald
May 26, 2013, 8:53:33 AM5/26/13
to
Tom McDonald
May 26, 2013, 9:08:15 AM5/26/13
to
could shut your fucking piehole before someone shuts it for you.
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
May 28, 2013, 9:35:28 PM5/28/13
to
> We need a pill to cure them. But their deviant behaviour should not be
> encouraged.
--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Ah, an agnostic. Let us know when the fence starts hurting your ass."
-- Chib I. Abos (March 25, 2012)
Ken
May 30, 2013, 2:45:05 PM5/30/13
to
In article <26ieq8144gh9l5bvt...@4ax.com>
Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 20:46:16 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 29 May 2013 02:46:05 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> ><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 28 May 2013 10:51:11 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 25 May 2013 16:52:36 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> >>><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 23:58:41 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 09:13:03 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> >>>>><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:50:24 -0700 (PDT), harry <harry...@btinternet.com>
> >>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JD
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>It's so the perverts/paedos of America can get better access to
> >>>>>>>potential victims.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>It seems like they've had pretty good access under the homophobic rules.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>...and it can only get better with those attracted to the only sex
> >>>>>that is in Scouts?
> >>>>
> >>>>An openly gay "trusted member of the community" is not any more likely to be a
> >>>>pedophile than any other "trusted member of the community."
> >>>
> >>>Utter nonsense. The issue isn't "gay", rather sex. It has no
> >>>business in Boy Scouts, which is why they banned women from
> >>>leadership.
> >>>
> >>
> >>You're truly are thick.. I just explained it to you and not one bit sank in
> >
> >You "explained" nothing. You're too stupid.
> >>
> >>>>If you think about it, from your own response, a gay scoutmaster would have a
> >>>>giant flag on his head, but the guy pretending to be heterosexual with a wife
> >>>>and kids might get all the trust and access he needs.
> >>>
> >>>You really are an idiot. He *was* married, and *had* children. He
> >>>*WAS* gay.
> >>
> >>You're comments reveal that you are the one with a much better shot at the
> >>title.
> >
> >You really are a loser. No wonder you're a lefty.
>
>
> Another pathetic troll (or sock puppet).
That doesn't change anything in your case. You're still a
mentally crippled lefty.
Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 20:46:16 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 29 May 2013 02:46:05 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> ><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 28 May 2013 10:51:11 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 25 May 2013 16:52:36 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> >>><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 23:58:41 -0400, k...@attt.bizz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 09:13:03 -0400, Ben Kaufman
> >>>>><spaXm-mXe-anXd-p...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:50:24 -0700 (PDT), harry <harry...@btinternet.com>
> >>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On May 24, 5:36 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>>>>>On May 24, 5:36 am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <XnsA1C9DB1EE3D47nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> >>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> > Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>>>> > May 23 2013
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> > GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>>>> > Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>>>> > kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>>>> > popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>>>> > guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>>>> > Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>>>> > delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>>>> > BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>>>> > to 475 no.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> >http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> >>>>>>>> > lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> > Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
> >>>>>>>> > May 23 2013
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> > GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
> >>>>>>>> > Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
> >>>>>>>> > kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
> >>>>>>>> > popular youth organizations, ditching membership
> >>>>>>>> > guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
> >>>>>>>> > Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
> >>>>>>>> > delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
> >>>>>>>> > BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
> >>>>>>>> > to 475 no.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> >http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18447459-boy-scouts-vote-to-
> >>>>>>>> > lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's about fucking time!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are still
> >>>>>>>> a bigoted organization.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy Scouts are still
> >>>>>>>> a bigoted organization.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JD
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>It's so the perverts/paedos of America can get better access to
> >>>>>>>potential victims.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>It seems like they've had pretty good access under the homophobic rules.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>...and it can only get better with those attracted to the only sex
> >>>>>that is in Scouts?
> >>>>
> >>>>An openly gay "trusted member of the community" is not any more likely to be a
> >>>>pedophile than any other "trusted member of the community."
> >>>
> >>>Utter nonsense. The issue isn't "gay", rather sex. It has no
> >>>business in Boy Scouts, which is why they banned women from
> >>>leadership.
> >>>
> >>
> >>You're truly are thick.. I just explained it to you and not one bit sank in
> >
> >You "explained" nothing. You're too stupid.
> >>
> >>>>If you think about it, from your own response, a gay scoutmaster would have a
> >>>>giant flag on his head, but the guy pretending to be heterosexual with a wife
> >>>>and kids might get all the trust and access he needs.
> >>>
> >>>You really are an idiot. He *was* married, and *had* children. He
> >>>*WAS* gay.
> >>
> >>You're comments reveal that you are the one with a much better shot at the
> >>title.
> >
> >You really are a loser. No wonder you're a lefty.
>
>
> Another pathetic troll (or sock puppet).
That doesn't change anything in your case. You're still a
mentally crippled lefty.
0 new messages