Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Replacement for backgroundrb?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
PeteSalty  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2009, 1:40 pm
From: PeteSalty <petesa...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:40:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: Replacement for backgroundrb?
Peter,

This looks like a good idea, thanks for the link.

Dale

On Nov 3, 11:56 pm, Peter De Berdt <peter.de.be...@pandora.be> wrote:

> On 04 Nov 2009, at 01:21, PeteSalty wrote:

> > We currently run backgroundrb to do a few things that need to happen
> > every minute or so, i.e. check for email from a Google email account,
> > re-index Xapian, that kind of thing.
> > BackgroundRB has served us well but it's kind of a memory hog and we'd
> > really like to investigate the possibility for swapping it out for
> > something else a little less memory intensive but can still do cron
> > like processing. We've looked at Workling, DelayedJob, and a few
> > others but they don't have the cron like behaviour.
> > Does anyone have any suggestions?

> You could still use Workling combined with any background processor it  
> supports and call it from cron.

> http://www.aaronvb.com/blog/2009/7/20/reoccur-scheduling-with-starlin...

> Best regards

> Peter De Berdt


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.