Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Newbie - deployment, hosting

Received: by 10.216.51.138 with SMTP id b10mr40380wec.8.1351840845853;
        Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.77.130 with SMTP id s2ls2967380wiw.4.gmail; Fri, 02 Nov
 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.74 with SMTP id w10mr236589wiy.4.1351840770941;
        Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.74 with SMTP id w10mr236587wiy.4.1351840770931;
        Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <envyge...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hm1si62129wib.3.2012.11.02.00.19.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of envyge...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.54;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of envyge...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=envyge...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id dt10so1922310wgb.23
        for <rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Prz6iqIww5yx2ETut0BV9KVxWTx7eE7hTOCw1+IsKvU=;
        b=exYQjA/WdeSndVAzEBZmFAgeMOGO/yvPqQ64mnO2YGaTM9M/y43fov8QJdnD7eByWC
         CPlHqeILBhD/r4Yn63HJOYpDTymdKDe+l7ScIwWo0qUtMkPNV0QsonpaJbXwXcC/BhfL
         8WeuwSQBxC3iAzdO/c8iOTMdr5vTc8kqS2MD3M6qp/bxHp+MPS1rG4MfPqtL9aFN72ZF
         UTU+6O/VCJcU0KDdBrcofcIPFXRuF0p7ix8XABZ1vCvztLcnDLcF3TaXGn0612Cc6IR4
         0raE3q7ZABbBxsCtQoUphXnmnYvBdi6679imwZqQfgz9HMwL0ovnnSNSWhdArQswE16Q
         Uo4A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.194.38 with SMTP id l38mr284826wen.80.1351840770822; Fri,
 02 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.235.22 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <75667140-9478-4ac6-8c1d-1b1825e417bc@googlegroups.com>
References: <7463f95a-7985-4a39-bee4-63236182fbee@googlegroups.com>
	<75667140-9478-4ac6-8c1d-1b1825e417bc@googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 02:19:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM5XQnxP21OaeJiqr8hcm=8HVpvO2ZcXzotUj7PmV7c+Bxy...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Rails] Re: Newbie - deployment, hosting
From: Jordon Bedwell <envyge...@gmail.com>
To: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Adnan <adnan.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about Appfog??

Maybe once they learn that MySQL is not as cool as they want it to be,
I understand we can choose Postgres after the fact but having an
unbound MySQL instance on my app would get pretty annoying since I
like concise and not cluttered.