Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Problem with routes after scaffold

Received: by 10.180.75.197 with SMTP id e5mr722233wiw.1.1351701428402;
        Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.90.134 with SMTP id bw6ls9139823wib.1.canary; Wed, 31 Oct
 2012 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.74 with SMTP id w10mr711210wiy.4.1351701366395;
        Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.74 with SMTP id w10mr711209wiy.4.1351701366383;
        Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <li...@ruby-forum.com>
Received: from eq4.andreas-s.net (eq4.andreas-s.net. [188.40.52.210])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hm1si272360wib.3.2012.10.31.09.36.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA);
        Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of li...@ruby-forum.com designates 188.40.52.210 as permitted sender) client-ip=188.40.52.210;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of li...@ruby-forum.com designates 188.40.52.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=li...@ruby-forum.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 1004)
  by eq4.andreas-s.net with local; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:36:06 +0100
  id 00000000005D402B.0000000050915376.00005F1C
Old-Return-Path: <li...@ruby-forum.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:36:05 +0100
From: IT Coobo Internal Team <li...@ruby-forum.com>
Reply-To: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
To: rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <c896a85af6d981fb4eefe36088693f77@ruby-forum.com>
In-Reply-To: <72f67074f85917cef00f66f15cf84d69@ruby-forum.com>
References: <72f67074f85917cef00f66f15cf84d69@ruby-forum.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with routes after scaffold
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-to: li...@ruby-forum.com

thanks Tommaso and hazardco!

:)

both ways worked.


solved.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.