More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that
"we don't need no freakin' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS".
I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this
issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails
(adva-cms, radiant, zena):
Gaspard
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that
> "we don't need no freakin' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS".
>
>
> Gaspard
Rails is to a CMS as a truck is to a banana.
>
> I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this
> issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails
> (adva-cms, radiant, zena):
>
> http://bit.ly/2rJa6D
>
> Gaspard
> --
--
Leonardo Mateo.
There's no place like ~
In fact, the complete argument is that Rails with generic plugins = CMS.
But these arguments mostly date from the early ages of the CMS page on
rails' first wiki when people were discovering REST, pretty urls and
scaffolding...
>
>>
>> I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this
>> issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails
>> (adva-cms, radiant, zena):
>>
>> http://bit.ly/2rJa6D
>>
>> Gaspard
>> --
>
>
>
> --
> Leonardo Mateo.
> There's no place like ~
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Ahhh, but you can take a banana to market with a truck... so to speak.