RUBY on Rails CMM level company does not have much employees

[Rajarshi]

Why CMM level 5 Companies not working in ruby on rails rather than they worked in java or .net

All small companies are working in ROR
And if any big company is working the strength of employees are much less in India why it is?

[Hassan Schroeder]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Rajarshi <rdas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why CMM level 5 Companies not working in ruby on rails rather than they
> worked in java or .net

> And if any big company is working the strength of employees are much less in
> India why it is?

Maybe you should be asking those companies :-)

--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.s...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan

[Rajarshi]

Thnaks for our reply

can you ask for me?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

[Rajarshi]

I think ROR is not For a big project tools
That's why it is only use for freelance

[Fernando Almeida]

These companies are not freelancers
http://blog.obiefernandez.com/content/2008/03/big-name-compan.html

2011/9/20 Rajarshi <rdas...@gmail.com>

--
Fernando Almeida
www.fernandoalmeida.net

[Rajarshi]

Ok thanks for the information

But You know the employee strength of java and .net is much more rather than ruby on rails for those companies.

Because ror does not have a capability for big project

[venkata reddy]

Dear Rajarshi,
MNCs started recruiting ROR people.I heard TCS is
recruiting 3yr experience rails developers.
Dont think rails cannot be scalable. Its already proven technology.

On Sep 20, 10:01 am, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok thanks for the information
>
> But You know the employee strength of java and .net is much more rather than
> ruby on rails for those companies.
>
> Because ror does not have a capability for big project
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Fernando Almeida <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ferna...@fernandoalmeida.net> wrote:
> > These companies are not freelancers
> >http://blog.obiefernandez.com/content/2008/03/big-name-compan.html
>

> > 2011/9/20 Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com>

>
> >> I think ROR is not For a big project tools
> >> That's why it is only use for freelance
>

> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Thnaks for our reply
>
> >>> can you ask for me?
>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Hassan Schroeder <

> >>> hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Why CMM level 5 Companies not working in ruby on rails rather than
> >>>> they
> >>>> > worked in java or .net
>
> >>>> > And if any big company is working the strength of employees are much
> >>>> less in
> >>>> > India why it is?
>
> >>>> Maybe you should be asking those companies  :-)
>
> >>>> --

> >>>> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com

[Rajarshi]

Dear Venkata,

can you compare the strength of TCS in ror
and in .net
then u understand the difference

Thnaks

[Rajarshi]

I mean employee strength

.net worked more than 8 Lacs
and in ror it is 50

[venkata reddy]

Dear Rajarshi,
You know what, Microsoft is big client for TCS. Microsoft will
deafinitely force TCS to use that technology and TCS has to go
according to that desperitely.
There are some big companies behind .net and Java, mind you. People
started realizing the strength and fun of rails. It will take small
amount of time for rails to rock in even MNCs not much time.

On Sep 20, 10:30 am, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I mean employee strength
>
> .net worked more than 8 Lacs
> and in ror it is 50
> <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Venkata,
>
> > can you compare the strength of TCS in ror
> > and in .net
> > then u understand the difference
>
> > Thnaks
>

> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:48 AM, venkata reddy <venkatareddy...@gmail.com

[venkata reddy]

What is a big project according to you. Something like Facebook which
is built on php is a big project for you? If you think so,Tumblr is
also built on PHP but failed.
Then what do you say? Does it mean PHP is not scalable?

[Hassan Schroeder]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Rajarshi <rdas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I mean employee strength

BREAKING NEWS: companies burdened with legacy commitments
(and fear of change) invest more in legacy technologies.

Amazing but true.

Me, I'm betting on the mammals.

[Usman Ahmed]

Rails is agile. people should actually know this by now
Rails is different from existing stuff, its the future
CMMI is good but personally i think rails deserves something different
and Rails is novel thing , at least where I live, in Pakistan few
companies are working on Rails
and in well known freelancing marketplaces theres not much Rails work
still
and usually I've seen people start jumping into outsourcing business
without sufficient knowledge of software development and trying to
start new companies

these people are utterly unaware of whats going on in the cutting edge
of web dev.
they only want to hire a few people, get an internet connection and
start churning out low quality websites

and this wont stop, middle men in the first world are makin big money
if they find a company in teh third world which produces stuff at low
price and fast turnarounds

Rails is awesome. and awesomeness doesnt come cheap.
plus rails is for highly opinionated people. period.

I'm hoping to see more people coming to rails

On Sep 19, 10:55 pm, Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Rajarshi <rdas2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I mean employee strength
>
> BREAKING NEWS: companies burdened with legacy commitments
> (and fear of change) invest more in legacy technologies.
>
> Amazing but true.
>
> Me, I'm betting on the mammals.
>
> --

> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.comhttp://about.me/hassanschroeder
> twitter: @hassan

[Rajarshi]

oooh

I am just telling the truth man
the strength of people in CMMi company is less for ROR
Yes rails is awesome as far as i have developed srping struts
rails is much better thna those.

But strength of employee is less man

As
1.Desktop application is not made by rails
As Microsoft and ISO take place.

Microsoft use .net
and for mac ios use cocoa

So only in that case it is far lagged behind others but


for Web development

RAILS IS THE GOD AND IT WILL

> twitter: @hassan

[pepe]

> Me, I'm betting on the mammals.


>
> --

> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.comhttp://about.me/hassanschroeder
> twitter: @hassan

[pepe]

> Me, I'm betting on the mammals.

Good one! :D

[Marc Byrd]

Larger companies are reluctant to invest in a technology until it has demonstrated some level of stability from a specification and tools point of view.  In this light, breakages in backward compatibility may cause a technology to acquire a bad reputation that in turn impedes its adoption.  

m

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:21 PM, pepe <Pe...@betterrpg.com> wrote:

> Me, I'm betting on the mammals.

Good one! :D

[Hassan Schroeder]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Marc Byrd <dr.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Larger companies are reluctant to invest in a technology until it has
> demonstrated some level of stability

yep, because for Big Companies, "stability" is Job 1.

OTOH, smaller (== small-a-'agile') companies are eager to invest in
a technology if it *currently* demonstrates some level of competitive
advantage, because they're in a position to exploit it.

Place y'r bets, ladies and gentlemen, place y'r bets ... :-)

[Colin Law]

On 22 September 2011 02:19, pepe <Pe...@betterrpg.com> wrote:
>> Me, I'm betting on the mammals.

I think there are a lot more species of birds (ie dinosaurs) then
there are mammals.

Colin