Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Active Record Query Interface Example code

Received: by 10.224.215.194 with SMTP id hf2mr14005201qab.0.1341463803280;
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 21:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: rubyonrails-docs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.216.70 with SMTP id hh6ls14529795qab.4.gmail; Wed, 04 Jul
 2012 21:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.105.137 with SMTP id t9mr13992339qao.7.1341463802615;
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 21:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.203.69 with SMTP id fh5msqab;
        Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.74.8 with SMTP id w8mr951291yhd.4.1341441499968; Wed, 04
 Jul 2012 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 lon.cana...@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=lon.cana...@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header...@gmail.com
Received: by j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:38:19
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <7853248e-7f1d-4dcb-a71b-177d0c4ad98b@j10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Active Record Query Interface Example code
From: Lon Canaday <lon.cana...@gmail.com>
To: "Ruby on Rails: Documentation" <rubyonrails-docs@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm trying to get started with Ruby on Rails using RailsGuides and I
have found them very helpful so far.  The information in the sections
on migrations, and Active Record validations and associations has been
useful and concisely presented with just enough examples to get me
started.  However, the Active Record Query Interface guide is too
sparse on the examples.  There is not a single "whole picture" example
that shows how the queries fit into a class.  All it would take is one
so we newbies could see how the queries fit in.

It would be great if this could be addressed in a future release.

Best Regards,