Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
AR Relation docs
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Oscar Del Ben  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5 2012, 9:49 pm
From: Oscar Del Ben <os...@oscardelben.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:49:19 -0700
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2012 9:49 pm
Subject: AR Relation docs

Hi guys,

I'm covering this file, and I've noticed that the bang version of the methods are not prefixed by no-doc.

Example:

includes!
preload!
join!

etc.

Should I go ahead and add no-docs to those?

--
Oscar Del Ben


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ryan Bigg  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6 2012, 6:41 pm
From: Ryan Bigg <radarliste...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:41:03 +1000
Local: Fri, Jul 6 2012 6:41 pm
Subject: Re: [Rails-docs] AR Relation docs

Depends. How are they different to their non-bang variants?

--
Ryan Bigg


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Oscar Del Ben  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6 2012, 6:44 pm
From: Oscar Del Ben <os...@oscardelben.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:44:48 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 6 2012 6:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Rails-docs] AR Relation docs

in general, the non bang version allows for empty arguments, and calls the bang version if everything looks good.

Example:

https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b6ce2306cdbc5b074b75d5a22d6bfdc83...

--
Oscar Del Ben
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ryan Bigg  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6 2012, 6:45 pm
From: Ryan Bigg <radarliste...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:45:01 +1000
Local: Fri, Jul 6 2012 6:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Rails-docs] AR Relation docs

In that case then, yeah I would nodoc the bang versions

--
Ryan Bigg


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Oscar Del Ben  
View profile  
 More options Jul 6 2012, 6:47 pm
From: Oscar Del Ben <os...@oscardelben.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:47:12 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 6 2012 6:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Rails-docs] AR Relation docs

will do

--
Oscar Del Ben
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »