The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Michael Schuerig <mich...@schuerig.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:17:08 +0100 (MET)
Local: Fri, Dec 8 2006 1:17 pm
Subject: Re: Migrations and SVN branches (comments requested)
On Friday 08 December 2006 18:53, Francois Beausoleil wrote:
> 2006/12/8, Brad Ediger <b...@bradediger.com>: If I understand your suggestion correctly, it amounts to sorting and > > On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Courtenay wrote: > > > Here's the patch :) > > That looks really neat. It's certainly simpler than my solution, > I don't know. Maybe we should drop version numbers altogether ? > Take a look at my proposed solution: applying migrations based on timestamp. I think real time is not the right dimension for this as progress on different branches is not coordinated by time. Rather, I suggest to apply migrations in the order of their corresponding revision numbers. This approach doesn't guarantee that there can be no conflicts when branches are merged, but I think this can't be guaranteed anyway. Michael -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||