In my opinion, the current behaviour is a bug, and should be fixed.
If you have a use case where passing procs to the child associations
is actually useful, chime in.
Jonathan del Strother
Jeremy Kemper
unread,
Nov 20, 2007, 6:25:54 PM11/20/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
Calling all folks using to_xml with a block -- what do you think?
jeremy
chuyeow
unread,
Nov 21, 2007, 9:53:36 PM11/21/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Ruby on Rails: Core
How about something like this instead (that still prevents the top-
level :procs options from being passed on to associations)?