Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
RSpec 1.0
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Chelimsky  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2007, 5:10 pm
From: "David Chelimsky" <dchelim...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 06:10:04 +0900
Local: Sat, May 19 2007 5:10 pm
Subject: [ANN] RSpec 1.0
The RSpec Development Team is extraordinarily pleased to announce the
release of RSpec-1.0.0.

== RSpec

RSpec provides a Domain Specific Language for describing and verifying
the behaviour of Ruby code with executable examples.

Some people like to call these examples "tests". In fact, they are.
But we believe that tests have equally important value as
documentation and as a design aid, and that the testing nomenclature
and syntax in most unit testing frameworks keep too much focus on only
the testing value, and hide the design and documentation value.

This belief was a prime motivator for the emergence of Behaviour
Driven Development, and RSpec is the original BDD tool in Ruby.

== 1.0.0

This release represents a stake in the ground for the current API.
While RSpec will certainly continue to grow as more people use it and
provide valuable feedback, we are committed to the supporting the
current API.

Does this mean that we'll never break backwards compatibility again?
We hope that it does. Of course, we can not predict all of the great
ideas will come along. If we find ourselves in a situation in which
such a change requires breaking backwards compatibility, we will only
do so in a major release (i.e. 2.0.0), and will continue to support
the previous major release for a reasonable amount of time.

== Thanks

We'd like to thank the 300+ members of the rspec-users and rspec-devel
mailing lists who provide us with consistently invaluable feedback.

We'd also like to thank the 40 contributors who have helped to fix
nearly 200 bugs and 150 feature requests since Steve Baker registered
RSpec in July of 2005. See
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/community/index.html.

== Numbers and facts

* 16000 Downloads (ranked 31 on Rubyforge)
* 40 contributors (bugfixes and patches)
* 2000 svn commits
* 890,000 Google hits for rspec+ruby
* 100% coverage
* 100% Self-describing

== The RSpec Development Team is

David Chelimsky
Aslak Hellesøy
Brian Takita
Dave Astels
Steve Baker (the original author)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bil Kleb  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2007, 9:00 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Bil Kleb <Bil.K...@NASA.gov>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:00:10 +0900
Local: Sat, May 19 2007 9:00 pm
Subject: Re: [ANN] RSpec 1.0

David Chelimsky wrote:
> The RSpec Development Team is extraordinarily pleased to announce the
> release of RSpec-1.0.0.

Happy days!

Congratulations,
--
Bil Kleb
http://fun3d.larc.nasa.gov


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »