> On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devruby...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm > having > > trouble installing 1.9
> The problem is not with Ruby itself but with the libraries it uses > (zlib for gems, readline for irb, openssl for encryption and https > networking, sqlite, ...)
> Most of these use unique build systems and have binaries built for > windows with different compilers.
> To link this all together with Ruby is a recipe for disaster.
> For that reason Luis is working on a new One Click installer which > builds all the libraries and ruby from source using the MinGW > compiler.
> Unfortunately not all of the libraries build well in the MinGW > environment out of the box (or on Windows at all) so the project > requires lots of tedious work. There are only development and testing > releases of this installer. As far as I know no final release that > includes at least all the basic parts is available.
Yeah, I'm having some problems installing too... I can do the compiling, I'll figure it out, but I can't figure out how I get the tools needed to do it, the win32 readme said I needed these:
Note: building ruby requires following commands. * nmake * cl * lib * dumpbin
I have nmake, but how do I acquire the others? Google isn't helping me.
- Jayce
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramr...@centrum.cz> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:20 PM To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 is released
> On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devruby...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm >> having >> trouble installing 1.9
> The problem is not with Ruby itself but with the libraries it uses > (zlib for gems, readline for irb, openssl for encryption and https > networking, sqlite, ...)
> Most of these use unique build systems and have binaries built for > windows with different compilers.
> To link this all together with Ruby is a recipe for disaster.
> For that reason Luis is working on a new One Click installer which > builds all the libraries and ruby from source using the MinGW > compiler.
> Unfortunately not all of the libraries build well in the MinGW > environment out of the box (or on Windows at all) so the project > requires lots of tedious work. There are only development and testing > releases of this installer. As far as I know no final release that > includes at least all the basic parts is available.
I was particularly interested in C-derrived languages due to my experience with a scripting and config language based on C.
However, after some days of Ruby, I quickly got the gripe of the dynamic, simple, yet powerful language and started to discover the wonders this higher level language has to offer. Pulled some friends into it, and have been able to learn from more advanced programmers.
Since then i've been developing Ruby and Rails applications with a lot of fun; anything is basically easy to do.
Anyway, enough fan-talk! Got a MinGW build ready and roling; Don't know if it's acustomed to share, or self compile / wait for one click? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Zayd Abdullah wrote: > Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version?
Luis plans on releasing a mingw 1.8.6 and a mingw 1.9, so yeah [he was waiting for the official release first]. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> Zayd Abdullah wrote: >> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version?
> Luis plans on releasing a mingw 1.8.6 and a mingw 1.9, so yeah [he was > waiting for the official release first]. > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrés Suárez" <ans...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
C:\Documents and Settings\User>gem install ftools c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `require': 126: The specified odule could not be found. - c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32/zlib.so (Load rror) from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `<top (required)>
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `require' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top (required)>' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `require' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `<top (required
>'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in `requ re' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in `<top (required)>' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` equire' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` top (required)>' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in `require
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in `rescue n load_and_instantiate' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:132:in `load_an _instantiate' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:65:in `[]' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:118:in `find_co mand' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in `process args' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:75:in `run' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run' from c:/ruby/bin/gem.bat:32:in `<main>'
C:\Documents and Settings\User>
Got a few errors... figured it was due to uninstalled gems but the zlib.dll thing is cropping up again. How do I fix this?
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
> C:\Documents and Settings\User>gem install ftools > c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `require': 126: The > specified > odule could not be found. - c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32/zlib.so > (Load > rror) > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `<top > (required)>
> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `require' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top > (required)>' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `require' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `<top > (required>'
> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in > `requ > re' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in > `<top > (required)>' > from > c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` > equire' > from > c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` > top (required)>' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in > `require
> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in > `rescue > n load_and_instantiate' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:132:in > `load_an > _instantiate' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:65:in `[]' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:118:in > `find_co > mand' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in > `process > args' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:75:in `run' > from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run' > from c:/ruby/bin/gem.bat:32:in `<main>'
> C:\Documents and Settings\User>
> Got a few errors... figured it was due to uninstalled gems but the zlib.dll > thing is cropping up again. How do I fix this?
> -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com> > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> > Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
> > Fantastic! Thanks!
> > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Andrés Suárez" <ans...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM > > Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby > > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> > > Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
> >> If you are searching for win32 binaries of ruby1.9, this can help you:
How can I make it works in cygwin? (gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC)) There are some errors when I make it:
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `opt_sc.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `opt_sc.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optinsn.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optinsn.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optunifs.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optunifs.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `insns.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `insns_info.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns_info.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vmtc.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vmtc.inc' uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vm.inc' Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vm.inc' uncommon.mk:653: warning: overriding commands for target `node_name.inc' Makefile:287: warning: ignoring old commands for target `node_name.inc' uncommon.mk:668: warning: overriding commands for target `known_errors.inc' Makefile:290: warning: ignoring old commands for target `known_errors.inc' uncommon.mk:671: warning: overriding commands for target `miniprelude.c' Makefile:293: warning: ignoring old commands for target `miniprelude.c' uncommon.mk:680: warning: overriding commands for target `newline.c' Makefile:296: warning: ignoring old commands for target `newline.c' uncommon.mk:742: *** target file `up' has both : and :: entries. Stop. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Wu Junchen wrote: > How can I make it works in cygwin? > (gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC)) > There are some errors when I make it:
After downloaded the package from the ftp instead of checking out from svn,I can build it successfully,maybe the wrong thing I did is that before exec ./configure,I had executed 'autoconf' and make someting goes wrong. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this behaviour (which I don't believe I've seen noted in the other changes lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:
> On Jan 31, 8:34 am, Jayce Meade <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com> wrote: >> C:\Documents and Settings\User>gem install ftools >> c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `require': 126: The >> specified >> odule could not be found. - c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32/zlib.so >> (Load >> rror) >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `<top >> (required)>
>> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `require' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top >> (required)>' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `require' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `<top >> (required>'
>> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in >> `requ >> re' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in >> `<top >> (required)>' >> from >> c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` >> equire' >> from >> c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in ` >> top (required)>' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in >> `require
>> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in >> `rescue >> n load_and_instantiate' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:132:in >> `load_an >> _instantiate' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:65:in >> `[]' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:118:in >> `find_co >> mand' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in >> `process >> args' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:75:in >> `run' >> from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run' >> from c:/ruby/bin/gem.bat:32:in `<main>'
>> C:\Documents and Settings\User>
>> Got a few errors... figured it was due to uninstalled gems but the >> zlib.dll >> thing is cropping up again. How do I fix this?
>> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com> >> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM >> To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> >> Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
>> > Fantastic! Thanks!
>> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > From: "Andrés Suárez" <ans...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM >> > Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby >> > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org> >> > Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
>> >> If you are searching for win32 binaries of ruby1.9, this can help you:
Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote: > Jayce Meade wrote: >> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at >> Porting Libraries to Win32.
>> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but >> my >> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
> I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to > lost packages.
The hard disk was crashed two days ago. Wait patiently.
> Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote: >> Jayce Meade wrote: >>> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at >>> Porting Libraries to Win32.
>>> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but >>> my >>> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
>> I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to >> lost packages.
> The hard disk was crashed two days ago. > Wait patiently.
hi list, we are currently preparing Ruby 1.9.1-p0 and 1.8.7-p72 binary packages for Mac OSX (Leopard, Tiger, Panther and below also supported). I'll keep you all posted when the final packages are ready. Project page: http://rubyosx.com
In article <b37300880901300943r635f468dj1ed94ad869c63...@mail.gmail.com>, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on >release management, Yugui.
Kudos to the team!
>Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar >to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims? >This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.
I second that. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- EEC/RIF/SEU -=- Systems Engineering Unit
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first > stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
> Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer > syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8 > series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it. > Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.
> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.
Hi, I'm a kind of confused. It seem as this is the first production release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows 1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one. Do I need to wait for a final production release (somethin new for me) or it is www.ruby-lang.org update issue.
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca wrote:
> It seem as this is the first production > release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable > distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows > 1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
