Vote Now Open for Ruport Logo
Gregory Brown
http://reporting.stonecode.org/logos/all.html
Simply post back here with the number you wish to vote for.
All are welcome to cast one vote.
James Healy
> Simply post back here with the number you wish to vote for.
> All are welcome to cast one vote.
#21 gets my vote.
-- James Healy <ji...@deefa.com> Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:20:00 +1100
Public Key ID: B6D8A3F9
This message is signed with a digital signature. If interested,
please ask for instructions on how you can use it to verify I
was the author.
David Pollak
mikem836
#3
Gregory Brown
#20
none none
James Edward Gray II
I can't decide so I'm voting for two:
0
17
James Edward Gray II
Gregory Brown
Seems like this is hanging right now.
If it doesn't come back up within the next couple hours, I'll extend
the voting period...
Stefan Mahlitz
17
Gregory Brown
Looks like it's back to life.
pat eyler
paul
Brian DeLacey
Al Gordon
Dudley Flanders
0
:dudley
DerGuteMoritz
> http://reporting.stonecode.org/logos/all.html
Hi there,
just found this group cause I'm interested in Ruport and I must say
(no offense): Those are quite terrible logos and basically, they're
all just variations of two different ones. The train for new proposals
has, however, already left, I suppose?
Moritz
Gregory Brown
If you have a better logo to show, we'll look at it.
DerGuteMoritz
> If you have a better logo to show, we'll look at it.
Hi Gregory,
alrighty, I've asked a friend who is more skilled than me to whip
something up!
Just to be sure: I didn't mean to sound impolite, I just thought I had
to speak my mind since a promising project like this needs a proper
logo -- although I can't promise I can provide one, so keep on voting,
everyone ;)
Moritz
Gregory Brown
> alrighty, I've asked a friend who is more skilled than me to whip
> something up!
> Just to be sure: I didn't mean to sound impolite, I just thought I had
> to speak my mind since a promising project like this needs a proper
> logo -- although I can't promise I can provide one, so keep on voting,
> everyone ;)
It is generally better to have something to show before you criticize,
but if you do end up with something, we'll be happy to check it out.
Stefan Mahlitz
> On 8 Feb., 03:20, "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://reporting.stonecode.org/logos/all.html
>
> Hi there,
>
> just found this group cause I'm interested in Ruport and I must say
> (no offense): Those are quite terrible logos and basically, they're
> all just variations of two different ones. The train for new proposals
This is because there were 2 contributors and we tried several
variations with feedback from the list.
See the thread " Logo Concept".
Gregory Brown
> This is because there were 2 contributors and we tried several
> variations with feedback from the list.
Right, I should mention that I'm quite happy with the selection we
have in front of us and think the suggestions from the list made a
real difference.
If the OP thinks he has a good logo concept, it's early enough for us
to at least consider it, but it'd need to happen soon, like within the
next day or two for it to make sense.
DerGuteMoritz
On Feb 9, 2:42 pm, "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the OP thinks he has a good logo concept, it's early enough for us
> to at least consider it, but it'd need to happen soon, like within the
> next day or two for it to make sense.
Great, expect something tomorrow!
Also I'd like to mention that after toying around a little yesterday,
I find Ruport quite amazing so far--what a relief compared to
JasperReports. Thanks everyone! Maybe I can contribute something in
the near future, too (tutorial- or code-wise).
Moritz
Gregory Brown
> Also I'd like to mention that after toying around a little yesterday,
> I find Ruport quite amazing so far--what a relief compared to
> JasperReports.
Glad to hear you like it :)
> Thanks everyone! Maybe I can contribute something in
> the near future, too (tutorial- or code-wise).
Both are welcome. We've got a few people writing code, but not many
tutorials. Even small things like adding to the recipe[0] book would
be great.
[0]
Gregory Brown
>
> [0]
>
whoops, the recipes are here:
http://stonecode.svnrepository.com/ruport/trac.cgi/wiki/RuportRecipes
Daniel D.
As DerGuteMoritz announced, we got some quite late submission for a
possible ruport-logo. Been working on this the last hour and please
see this as a preview, I'm surely gonna tweak it a bit further. Still
I'd like to hear what you think of it:
http://fashionpirat.de/lager/ruport.png
Best regards,
Daniel
Gregory Brown
The ruport devs haven't finished the second round of voting, so what
I'll do is... if anyone who participated in the popular vote wishes to
change their vote to this logo, they may do so within the next 24
hours. We will recalculate the scores then and restart our developer
voting.'
So if this is your new favorite, just let us know.
James Edward Gray II
> So if this is your new favorite, just let us know.
Yep, I love it. I really like how it works in both the nickname and
full name of the project. It also combines the words well in the
logo. I'm a fan.
James Edward Gray II
David Pollak
Keith Fahlgren
Daniel D.
I made two more versions (just slight changes of the first logo):
http://fashionpirat.de/lager/ruport2.png
Best regards and thanks for the compliment :)
Daniel
Dudley Flanders
On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Gregory Brown wrote:
> So if this is your new favorite, just let us know.
Yeah, this is the one.
Michael Milner
So if this is your new favorite, just let us know.
This is my new favorite too.
pat eyler
I like it too.
Gregory Brown
>
> On 2/9/07, Michael Milner <mike...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2/9/07, Gregory Brown <gregory...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > So if this is your new favorite, just let us know.
> >
> > This is my new favorite too.
> >
>
> I like it too.
I have to be honest. We did put a lot of effort into our other
selections, but this design is better than mine :)
+1
Gregory Brown
>
> I made two more versions (just slight changes of the first logo):
>
> http://fashionpirat.de/lager/ruport2.png
I think it's safe to say that we'll seriously consider using this for our logo.
There are two major requirements:
1) We'd need it in an open format for editing / resizing.
2) We'd need it under a permissive license. It looks like it uses the
Ruby Identity package, so is it reasonable to assume it's a
Share-and-Sharealike CC license?
Daniel D.
#1 doesn't rellay exist anymore, #2 is a replacement of #1. Anyhow #2
and #3 can be found here:
http://fashionpirat.de/lager/ruport.svg
CC Share-and-Sharealike sounds fine to me, I'm giving the decsision in
your hands :)
I would honestly be happy to see my design on your great piece o'
software :)
Best regards,
Daniel Dormann
On 10 Feb., 02:10, "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.br...@gmail.com> wrote: