Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
[ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Yugui  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22, 6:36 am
From: Yugui <yu...@yugui.jp>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:36:40 +0900
Local: Tues, Sep 22 2009 6:36 am
Subject: [ruby-core:25707] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled
At RubyWorld conf, I talked with matz, ko1, Evan Phoenix, Charles
Nutter and Thomas Enebo.
Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release. I believe this makes it clear,
what Ruby 1.9 is. And this brings us more compatibility between
implementations.

But this decision takes little more time. So I cancel Ruby 1.9.2's
release schedule. A Ruby developer's meeting will be held soon. I'll
decide a new schedule at the meeting.

Thanks.
-- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eero Saynatkari  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22, 7:48 am
From: Eero Saynatkari <ruby...@kittensoft.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:48:32 +0900
Local: Tues, Sep 22 2009 7:48 am
Subject: [ruby-core:25708] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled
Excerpts from Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)'s message of Tue Sep 22 13:36:40 +0300 2009:

> Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
> Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
> Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release.

> But this decision takes little more time. So I cancel Ruby 1.9.2's
> release schedule.

Excellent, thanks for the info.

--
Magic is insufficiently advanced technology.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Run Paint Run Run  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22, 9:48 am
From: Run Paint Run Run <run...@runpaint.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:48:14 +0900
Local: Tues, Sep 22 2009 9:48 am
Subject: [ruby-core:25711] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled

> At RubyWorld conf, I talked with matz, ko1, Evan Phoenix, Charles
> Nutter and Thomas Enebo.
> Then I understood importance of RubySpec. Now I agree Run Paint Run
> Run's suggestion - [ruby-core:24050].
> Ruby 1.9.2 must pass before release. I believe this makes it clear,
> what Ruby 1.9 is. And this brings us more compatibility between
> implementations.

Wow. Thank you, everybody. Please let us know if we can help this process. :-)

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Run Paint Run Run  
View profile  
 More options Oct 11, 2:48 am
From: Run Paint Run Run <run...@runpaint.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:48:29 +0900
Local: Sun, Oct 11 2009 2:48 am
Subject: [ruby-core:26051] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2's schedule canceled

>  Ruby 1.9.2 must pass [RubySpec] before release.

What is the plan to achieve this? Is it intended that *all* of
RubySpec should pass, or just the 'core' and 'language' specs? The
latter is the most feasible.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google