Is there some underlying fundamental reason behind this mismatch? If
not, it seems logical to support either inclusion or exclusion
wherever any of these functions reference groups (obviously failing
with a descriptive if you try to setup or require a group which has
not been installed).
Thanks,
-- Chad
Also, if you have multiple groups, such as a use case where
development, staging, production need specific gems or versions
thereof, you have to "exclude" 2 groups for a particular platform:
staging:
--without development, production
development:
-- without staging, prodcution
production:
--without staging, development
Confusing
There was talk at one time of the '--only' flag. Can we bring it back.?
Cheers,
Ed
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-bundler" group.
> To post to this group, send email to ruby-b...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ruby-bundler...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-bundler?hl=en.
>
>