http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite Discussion group for the Ruby Benchmark Suite project. 2011-05-30T15:44:33Z Google Groups rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com 2011-05-30T15:44:33Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/345ccee96765dac8/ddc710f4b1973b82?show_docid=ddc710f4b1973b82

might be interesting to benchmark jruby on openJDK 7 ... <br> <p>ref: <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://groups.google.com/group/mirah/browse_thread/thread/4e0c2d32ea2a79e0">[link]</a>

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-07-29T03:05:30Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/a3275d167d50acd3/09fa9702e3d371f7?show_docid=09fa9702e3d371f7

Is a similar file parsing task already present within the suite? <br> Cheers, <br> Antonio

Evan Phoenix e...@fallingsnow.net 2010-07-21T05:53:30Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/1d313910a0eebb18?show_docid=1d313910a0eebb18

- Evan // via iPhone <br> Perhaps: &quot;The bm_prime benchmark was originally written to aid the development of the Prime class. As such in 1.9.2 it was rewritten in C, which makes it a poor representation of impl. performance. This benchmark will removed in the future.&quot;

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-07-21T02:33:04Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/4b9e1fa5494a9a82?show_docid=4b9e1fa5494a9a82

Any preference on the wording of the note?

Evan Phoenix e...@fallingsnow.net 2010-07-21T01:43:31Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/f58750cded2fedef?show_docid=f58750cded2fedef

I'd like if you would, so that people know how to interpret the data better. <br> - Evan

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-07-21T01:35:58Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/45a6630cb8f378b5?show_docid=45a6630cb8f378b5

I would consider adding a warning note to the time result section.

Evan Phoenix e...@fallingsnow.net 2010-07-20T16:33:50Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/3223d1b589c547c2?show_docid=3223d1b589c547c2

Would you consider removing the results from the current shootout?

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-07-20T16:29:38Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/3f629797cc9eb73e?show_docid=3f629797cc9eb73e

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Monty Williams &lt; <br> For some reason I don't think I received Evan's email. I agree that we can <br> exclude/remove the benchmark. <br> Cheers, <br> Antonio

Monty Williams monty.willi...@gemstone.com 2010-07-20T16:17:39Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/43f7c079b7e56963?show_docid=43f7c079b7e56963

Evan Phoenix e...@fallingsnow.net 2010-07-20T08:16:39Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/67e46a4d190f0aa9/6529638a79325b85?show_docid=6529638a79325b85

Hi everyone, especially Antonio, <br> I was looking over Antonio's new shootout results and I'd like to ask that we remove bm_prime entirely. It's a red herring benchmark entirely now, because nearly all implementations timeout on it, except for 1.9.2 because in 1.9.2, Prime is entirely in C. <br> So all it proves is that 1.9.2's Prime C code is faster than ruby code. It doesn't serve as a anything close to a reflection of overall implementation performance.

rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com 2010-07-14T16:28:26Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/a3275d167d50acd3/2640ddf2bbe7f165?show_docid=2640ddf2bbe7f165

I ran into a case today where parsing a large-ish file took me like <br> 80s on MRI, 5s on jruby. <br> Should I add it as a benchmark do you think? <br> -r

rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com 2010-07-14T16:24:23Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/aebdb30d9d690f9a/93e1d11e564927e7?show_docid=93e1d11e564927e7

Lacks the large ri benchmark?

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-06-28T17:44:28Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/aebdb30d9d690f9a/188f9953f549ad3f?show_docid=188f9953f549ad3f

In the &quot;old days&quot; this would have been too time consuming. But with today's <br> performance of most implementations, I think it's feasible to increase the <br> limit. I will definitely consider it for the upcoming Linux shootout. <br> Cheers,

Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com 2010-06-28T17:40:23Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/aebdb30d9d690f9a/57a65111aefc9a26?show_docid=57a65111aefc9a26

My guess is that those 2 dozen Timeouts would go away if you raised <br> the timeout to 300 seconds ;-) <br> <p>No need to do anything as crazy as the benchmarks game where I let <br> Ruby 1.8.7 have 24,000 seconds for fannkuch-redux :-)

Antonio Cangiano acangi...@gmail.com 2010-06-28T14:30:07Z http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-benchmark-suite/browse_thread/thread/aebdb30d9d690f9a/6708bfaba569b003?show_docid=6708bfaba569b003

<a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://programmingzen.com/2010/06/28/the-great-ruby-shootout-windows-edition/">[link]</a>