In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that mimic the structure of the document. As near as I can tell, this is not something that RHTMLO was meant to do. And I'm talking HTML (not CSS or Javascript).
Would you like a document about this once I get things working? POD?
<ghave...@materialisations.com> wrote: > In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that mimic > the structure of the document. As near as I can tell, this is not > something that RHTMLO was meant to do. And I'm talking HTML (not > CSS or Javascript).
I'm not sure what you mean here.
> Would you like a document about this once I get things working? > POD?
There's a wiki here that you can contribute to (you just need to send me your Google account email address, I think).
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gordon Haverland
> <ghave...@materialisations.com> wrote: > > In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that > > mimic the structure of the document. As near as I can tell, > > this is not something that RHTMLO was meant to do. And I'm > > talking HTML (not CSS or Javascript).
> I'm not sure what you mean here.
I'm a dinosaur that would much rather be doing differential equations or linear systems in FORTRAN, than trying to write UI in perl. My intention is to come up with a UI that is pure HTML (no CSS or Javascript required) for people to work with this data.
HTML does not allow nested forms. I can easily come up with nested forms using RHTMLO. I've read just about all the POD that is in the Rose::* modules, and a lot of the code (usually starting with test cases, or examples if present).
My problems, such as they are, are not about not reading some specific part of a POD document enough times. I ran into this back in 1982/83 when I came across a professor teaching operations research by the book. If you had a question, he would find a paragraph or two in the course textbook on the question, and he would read that section of text as the answer.
I think variety in answering questions is useful. I am offering to produce some extra documentation, which is possibly buggy, as I don't totally understand RDBO or RHTMLO at this point. I don't have a gmail address. Because of having Autism, my preference is to use LaTeX to produce hyperlinked PDFs, but that isn't what wikis run on. :-)
I hope things are drier where you are living, than here. Too much flooding in the last week or so.
<ghave...@materialisations.com> wrote: > I think variety in answering questions is useful. I am offering > to produce some extra documentation, which is possibly buggy, as I > don't totally understand RDBO or RHTMLO at this point. I don't > have a gmail address. Because of having Autism, my preference is > to use LaTeX to produce hyperlinked PDFs, but that isn't what > wikis run on. :-)
Well, whatever documentation you produce, I'd be glad to look at it. Just email it (or a URL to it) to me or to this mailing list when you're done.
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Gordon Haverland
> <ghave...@materialisations.com> wrote: > > I think variety in answering questions is useful. I am > > offering to produce some extra documentation, which is > > possibly buggy, as I don't totally understand RDBO or RHTMLO > > at this point. I don't have a gmail address. Because of > > having Autism, my preference is to use LaTeX to produce > > hyperlinked PDFs, but that isn't what wikis run on. :-)
> Well, whatever documentation you produce, I'd be glad to look > at it. Just email it (or a URL to it) to me or to this mailing > list when you're done.
Thank you. I'll try to produce something reasonable in POD.
