Received: by 10.204.129.81 with SMTP id n17mr565155bks.3.1345806102689;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: rope-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.4.74 with SMTP id 10ls1188131bkq.0.gmail; Fri, 24 Aug 2012
 04:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.128.207 with SMTP id l15mr564599bks.4.1345806101923;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.128.207 with SMTP id l15mr564598bks.4.1345806101910;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <aligr...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com (mail-bk0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si2417005bkv.1.2012.08.24.04.01.41
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of aligr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of aligr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=aligr...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by bkcjf3 with SMTP id jf3so452076bkc.25
        for <rope-dev@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :user-agent;
        bh=euVmg9y9w6iodDCfO5Hk4UeKEPcnMP8qNoNG/v4lV+E=;
        b=hZ672RLWY/wKtmlEqJkHprq/xJ70EXXttTvbtxu3ixO48K9SITztATR5xi8SoKkp7M
         itVrOjRbNLwg5eN2Iol/DxWHY2XPoXssXlCfBQ5l0NzPUwiAB+uKucFZTL1HV5STyKR1
         BU4SrakPf17hnsPEneb2IROKYIMwUhyfZwDKBp8ZFlcRthicqkU3WyDfgVp9gzwJID2H
         XkXXMFpKFhIf79uJAQ1mZR6omfJDnFhXcCV4bAjwW3tDmhwmv8Q2QRLf3kHGtIPXTtqj
         Wa9N7OkVEnQ5s/fahmcguz6iZoPK/n5lPMqO7EtSnU/peW/yyBIknqP99A4N5YpePwm7
         +KgA==
Received: by 10.204.129.8 with SMTP id m8mr1697520bks.62.1345806101708;
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <aligr...@gmail.com>
Received: from lilem.mirepesht ([2.178.103.250])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t23sm6156919bks.4.2012.08.24.04.01.39
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:39:07 +0430
From: Ali Gholami Rudi <aligr...@gmail.com>
To: Anton Beloglazov <anton.belogla...@gmail.com>
Cc: rope-dev@googlegroups.com, an...@angri.ru
Subject: Re: Patches: noerror option to code_assist
Message-ID: <20122408063...@lilem.mirepesht>
In-Reply-To: <11e60759-f3d8-4b11-90a8-fb7ab306586f@googlegroups.com>
References: <CAPM+gBR2Dv1Pf+FGyWMRo_+d4qwoM5X_ZXW2+t_CAU--mSK...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122303154...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <CAPM+gBRVvd=Wg=xPSb_vuMG8oOfW9DSCPyj4sP0Nkyx=NLu...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122403092...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <CAPM+gBTj5aRJiASsvBhkQFLGyT0DYb4B57z1_34xGg=uMvn...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122403165...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <CAPM+gBTx9Hi+q=XbLnfhRHGLLbsTSw=hnzUdtmXz=Eja1mg...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122503000...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <CAPM+gBQTVjj9doWxFKsvZTxjG+3zJ68fAy4=pyzabr0RUVM...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122503080...@lilem.mirepesht> <20122503083...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <CAPM+gBRvBVA+yxVr5juaLSom9KmtHhQkjatuCc39echPJ7c...@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM+gBTUZTd8Z5rANj6LG+bo--x9Rg8=yyV73s03DU1WXRM...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122503154...@lilem.mirepesht> <m1vclshjar....@gmail.com>
 <CAPM+gBQhi1-zVHyJPgin4G95HZN0ni+q3hE=udc6Df0Yg7R...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20122603000...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <0d811a66-bc49-4a24-8aa9-8d3a0b399b7a@googlegroups.com>
 <20122308182...@lilem.mirepesht>
 <m1y5l541mv....@gmail.com>
	<11e60759-f3d8-4b11-90a8-fb7ab306586f@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: git://repo.or.cz/mailx.git

Anton Beloglazov <anton.belogla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your replies! Is there any issue with incorporating this fix 
> into the main branch of rope?

I think that's a good idea.  Did you test it?

> On Friday, 24 August 2012 09:41:44 UTC+10, Leo wrote:
> > Note that Pymacs (0.25 and above) no longer prints the whole backtrace 
> > unless debug-on-error is non-nil. 

I don't think that would help, since we do want the error
message but the message is too long; codeassist syntax
errors have multi-line messages, each line describing an
attempt to fix the error.  The patch in my previous
mail made it less verbose.

	Ali