Yeah, that could actually be a cool use case. With the current client, you would either choose a long random password for your cloud-stored wallet and then forget it, or choose to only store your wallet locally and delete it once you're finished issuing. The users of your currency would have to trust that you've destroyed the key, but they can always verify the total outstanding IOUs, since they are published in the network -- the public ledger helps in this case...
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ripple Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Yeah, that could actually be a cool use case. With the current client, you would either choose a long random password for your cloud-stored wallet and then forget it, or choose to only store your wallet locally and delete it once you're finished issuing. The users of your currency would have to trust that you've destroyed the key, but they can always verify the total outstanding IOUs, since they are published in the network -- the public ledger helps in this case...
So we can just say in the currency description (which will have it's own secure web page), that new currency issued after a certain time is invalid.
Hi, all.
Have a questions to clarify how this centralized IOU could work.
If "Central account" makes 1000 IOU to "Alex", and Central frizzed. 1000 IOU will be binded Central(-1000)-(+1000)Alex , and if Alex spends the same currency it will not effect Central IOUs. e.g. Central(-1000)-(+1000)Alex(-10)-(+10)Bob
May be the idea is to look on total amount of IOUs of the same currency? - But somebody could make the same - issue IOUs to his account from fake one - so IOUs will be mixed in totals.
Totals are a (in this case misleading) abstraction, no? The important info is just not displayed. We just need a better way to see it.
--