You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Rhino Tools Dev
I need to filter the subscriptions being picked up in the
AutomaticallySubscribeConsumerMessages directly on the bus and would
like to add something like IGatherMessages with the default being the
AutomaticGatherer implementation. It'll follow same style of looping
through any implementations of IGatherMessages and add to the
collection for internal subscription.
A few questions:
1. Are there objections to that?
2. Would you prefer me to just do an Unsubscribe() (clumsy) and leave
the code alone?
3. If not, do I need to fork the master first and then issue a pull
request or can I just do something from the clone of the master I am
working on?
Before you ask why the standard namespacing convention isn't enough,
the answer is because I want to code the ConsumerOf interface in an
assembly of handlers but have control over the actual implementation
of the bus being used through configuration. Those Consumers will be
in the container and therefore be automatically subscribed.
I know the unsubscribe call would accomplish this, but it seems like
it'd be handy to have something like the Bootstrapper offers with
IsTypeAcceptableForThisBootStrapper directly on the bus.
Mike Nichols
unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 11:30:43 AM11/10/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Rhino Tools Dev
Ignore this...I was coding late and making things more complicated
than they need to be.