PSake and excluding the tests

8 views
Skip to first unread message

dagda1

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 4:47:26 PM10/24/09
to Rhino Tools Dev
Hi,

Is there anyway or a switch that you can pass into the .ps1 files to
exclude the running of the tests?

Cheers

Paul

Ayende Rahien

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 6:44:28 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Not at the moment, no.
A patch would be welcome.

Paul Cowan

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:01:21 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
>> A patch would be welcome.

On a selfish not, I wish you had gone for rake or rake-me http://github.com/agross/rake-me rather than psake as the new builder.

The dependency on powershell could be frustrating or not being able to add the builder as part of the distribution could be frustrating.

Anyway, that is very much just my opinion.

Cheers

Paul Cowan

Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)

http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/



2009/10/24 Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com>

Ayende Rahien

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:13:07 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Dependcy on rake is worse than PS IMO

Paul Cowan

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:18:22 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
I think I am just moaning because I don't want to learn psake :-)

On a side note, you can now get Rhino.Mocks from horn.

horn -install:Rhino.Mocks

This does rely on git, PowerBuilder 2.0 and msysgit being installed on the client machine of course.


Cheers

Paul Cowan

Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)

http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/



2009/10/25 Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com>

Ayende Rahien

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:24:46 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Awesome!

Paul Cowan

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:24:55 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
>> This does rely on git, PowerBuilder 2.0 and msysgit being installed on the client machine of course.

I meant, Powershell, the PSake module installed and msysgit.


Cheers

Paul Cowan

Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)

http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/



2009/10/25 Paul Cowan <dag...@scotalt.net>

Paul Cowan

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 7:26:00 PM10/24/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
I can move onto the other rhino tools now I have got PSake installed.

Ken Egozi

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 3:18:04 AM10/25/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Dependcy on rake is worse than PS IMO

reasoning?

I'd think that Paul's point is that IronRuby is 100% xcopy deployable, and you can put what you need in the /tools and be done with it.

imo basing scripts on IRuby/Boo is great, cuz the language lends itself to DSLs (you know this already), and you still can use the BCL (so it's better than cRuby for .NET people who are familiar with System.IO etc.)



--
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.delver.com
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם

Ayende Rahien

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 3:51:30 AM10/25/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
I don't do ruby

Nathan Stott

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 10:46:17 AM10/25/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Dependency on powershell is fine as long as it's not meant to work on mono

Paul Cowan

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 10:52:06 AM10/25/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Powershell won't work on mono will it?

Much as I hate the xml syntax of nant.  It was sort of nice that basically all OSS projects used the same build engine and having the builder as part of the distribution is really cool.

I hope nobody thinks I am trying to say which builder an OSS project should use.   I just want to raise the point.



Cheers

Paul Cowan

Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)

http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/



2009/10/25 Nathan Stott <nrs...@gmail.com>

Ayende Rahien

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 10:55:39 AM10/25/09
to rhino-t...@googlegroups.com
Take a look at the build scripts RT used to have, you'll quickly figure out what I went with this route :-)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages