From: Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:18:43 +0300
Local: Fri, Apr 18 2008 3:18 am
Subject: Re: [rethinking-cpan] Re: Definitive Tags (or Canonical Tags)
On Friday 18 April 2008, G. Wade Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:09:37 +0300 I think so, assuming I understand you. > Shlomi Fish <shlo...@iglu.org.il> wrote: > > I started to collect a list of "definitive" tags for CPAN modules, > > http://perl.net.au/wiki/Finding_a_Module_on_CPAN/Definitive_Tags > > This list is incomplete and note the comment at the top: > > {{{{{{{{{ > > Anyway, suggestions for more can be given here or you can edit the > If I understand your examples correctly, you are looking less for > If so, I can think of a few others. Yes, that would be nice. Of course one can determine it if it's Bundle:: or > Bundle - for groups of other Modules. Task:: > Extends - extends another module, plugins, policies, etc. has "components" and "wheels" which from what I understood are different kinds of plugins (although possibly with has-a instead of is-a). > API/Interface - modules that provide an interface and requires plugins Yes, that sounds good. You are talking about a base class 1-many drivers > or extension modules to do the work (DBI, XML::SAX, etc.) architecture. Both API and Interface can be used for other things, so we need a better label. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not an actor - I just play one on T.V. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||