Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Group info
Language: English
Group categories: Not categorized
More group info »
Discussions
View:  Topic list, Topic summary Topics 1 - 9 of 9

You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description: This group holds discussions on the rest-star.org transaction specification.  It defines a RESTful interface for 2pc-ACID transactions and forward-compensating transactions.

 

REST-AT draft 5 
 
By Mark Little  - Jan 19 2011 - 1 new of 1 message    

Draft 3 
  Added synchronizations, updated recovery and used Link relationships to allow registration of "non-2PC aware" participants. Mark.
By Mark Little  - Dec 24 2009 - 4 new of 4 messages    

REST-ACID 2.0 draft 2 
  I haven't added much more than in draft 1 but have spent the time looking at the comments from that draft. So for example, Link headers are used and there's a new media type for the transaction status. Comments welcome, though in the meantime I'll turn my attention to filling in the gaps in recovery, synchronizations etc.... more »
By Mark Little  - Dec 21 2009 - 1 new of 1 message    

Version 1.1 of atomic transaction protocol 
  I need to add some more text around the basic protocol, synchronizations and finish the recovery section, but I thought I'd send this over as it stands at the moment. I'll continue to work on 1.2 as well as the compensation protocol. Mark.
By Mark Little  - Nov 30 2009 - 8 new of 8 messages    

Updated protocol definition 
  I hope to have updates to the compensation and atomic models in the next week since I'm presenting on this topic at the 2nd SOA Symposium in Amsterdam in October. Will post here first. Mark.
By Mark Little  - Sep 25 2009 - 1 new of 1 message    

Relation of transactions to REST 
  Ideas on REST + TX: [link]
By bburke@redhat.com  - Sep 21 2009 - 1 new of 1 message    

Compensations moved to another Google Group 
  [link]
By bburke@redhat.com  - Sep 18 2009 - 1 new of 1 message    

Diskussion om forward-compensation-submissio n-1 
  Dangerous idea. What if something is not undoable?. Networks have a tendency to go down, and systems may be set into a read-only mode without warning. You may think you have a compensation strategy, but it may fail. I.e. Buy flowers for your wife in case of exposure.
By Martin Boel  - Sep 8 2009 - 2 new of 2 messages    

Diskussion om 2pc-transactions-submission-1 
  Interesting article and idea. I like the TC/{txid} idea, but it seems unwise to send a 404 return value on finished transactions, because its valuable to know the difference between an unknown transaction, and a finished one. I think it would be appropriate to return a 403, to indicate that the transaction is in a state where further... more »
By Martin Boel  - Sep 8 2009 - 3 new of 4 messages    

No more topics in this group.
1 - 9 of 9

XML       Send email to this group: reststar-tx@googlegroups.com