Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Draft 3
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark Little  
View profile  
 More options Dec 24 2009, 8:29 am
From: Mark Little <markclit...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:29:51 +0000
Local: Thurs, Dec 24 2009 8:29 am
Subject: Draft 3

Added synchronizations, updated recovery and used Link relationships  
to allow registration of "non-2PC aware" participants.

Mark.

  REST-ACIDv2 draft 3.pdf
359K Download


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bill Burke  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2010, 10:32 am
From: Bill Burke <bbu...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:32:20 -0500
Local: Wed, Jan 20 2010 10:32 am
Subject: Re: [REST-* Transactions] Draft 3
Some comments:

* I think you need to output the entire URL for the examples as it can
get confusing where things are.
* Do you think that we need an XML format?  Maye form data would be good
enough?  An XML or JSON format could always be created later and slapped
on through conneg later.
* For 2.3.5.1, do you relally need an XML document?  Or are there other
options?  Would just posting Link headers referencing the particpant
resource and terminator be enough?
* I think unaware participant is still too "aware".  What about creating
individual resources under the /participant for prepare/commit, etc.?

PUT /participant/123/prepare
Link: <...>; rel="preparor"
Content-Type: whatever

body to send to preparor

If you want to do it in one message, then do it with multipart form data.

Mark Little wrote:
> Added synchronizations, updated recovery and used Link relationships to
> allow registration of "non-2PC aware" participants.

> Mark.

--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Little  
View profile  
 More options Jan 20 2010, 11:01 am
From: Mark Little <markclit...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:01:08 +0000
Local: Wed, Jan 20 2010 11:01 am
Subject: Re: [REST-* Transactions] Draft 3
Thanks for the input. I'll take a look at this over the next few days  
and get back to you.

Mark.

On 20 Jan 2010, at 15:32, Bill Burke wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Draft 4" by Mark Little
Mark Little  
View profile  
 More options May 7 2010, 12:08 pm
From: Mark Little <markclit...@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 17:08:50 +0100
Local: Fri, May 7 2010 12:08 pm
Subject: [REST-* Transactions] Draft 4

Take a look at this draft. I've addressed the 2nd and 3rd bullets so  
far. Can you let me know which URLs in particular you were referring  
to for the 1st bullet and whether you still feel that the 4th bullet  
is necessary; if it is then I'll make the change.

In the meantime I'll take a look at the compensating transaction  
document.

Mark.

On 20 Jan 2010, at 15:32, Bill Burke wrote:

  REST-Atomic v2 draft 4.pdf
272K Download

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »