Message from discussion
Strong Named Assemblies
Received: by 10.68.219.170 with SMTP id pp10mr5051184pbc.1.1339131420715;
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: restsharp@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.212.39 with SMTP id nh7ls4078176pbc.4.gmail; Thu, 07 Jun
2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.191.225 with SMTP id hb1mr4958158pbc.5.1339131420049;
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.191.225 with SMTP id hb1mr4958156pbc.5.1339131420037;
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <andrewdyo...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tf10si3882942pbc.0.2012.06.07.21.57.00
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andrewdyo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.50;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of andrewdyo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andrewdyo...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pz0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h15so1970678dan.23
for <restsharp@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer
:mime-version:content-type;
bh=KH/Xw3RE3ApV4X7zXq6qfUTV1T/elV+OhRk6JEQRPUs=;
b=qRlQxY5dFDSGX/MLrGBIBkDeqIL/x62734oHYo6rRKk5WSEI2uDyHEzHhuEM0cxjBf
rVE7gYVURPb25aP6mAVjLTRT0pDA7OwovexgU2K7gokPczSZfZ8YZQLFwzuASkHR7BRM
7cZl4d74sWPH16yUiUG3NoK2yZSRFyL6MN0O5o+c9+ov8Q4lPD/zw5hMuMaf4jhcX7Ap
M9bb+CGG6Xvk8hQYc1+ubABTxEU+fGSlq96vohEtAQ8DD3wnMrS+nVHgD5qRD0mEaplN
RuJIUm7tBeWNzGDdEB2pOBOF9paecGpYP+3dcCcUiCXW55dJ3b39hmHYV8xs0xhnEz4n
Kpcg==
Received: by 10.68.231.164 with SMTP id th4mr15855458pbc.97.1339131419913;
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <andrewdyo...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.3.107] (99-95-173-147.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [99.95.173.147])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ve4sm1592758pbc.55.2012.06.07.21.56.58
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:56:59 -0700
From: Andrew Young <andrewdyo...@gmail.com>
To: restsharp@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <02C1FE6635A94A0F9880823B01964...@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <dd56ea0e-2075-4f01-bc18-3334281b0ce6@googlegroups.com>
References: <16dbe526-c5f2-4b08-a7d7-5c89ff5b4...@h3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
<dd2fe374-4078-49a3-9086-4729c22f6...@e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
<15266426.254.1327430007449.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhp24>
<dd56ea0e-2075-4f01-bc18-3334281b0ce6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Strong Named Assemblies
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6 (build 1081.27)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4fd1861b_66334873_41ed"
--4fd1861b_66334873_41ed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Please read: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/restsharp/yjGCtOnEYHk/XbKZi0yjN8cJ
On Thursday, June 7, 2012 at 17:13, Ivan Gavryliuk wrote:
> Could you at least publish signed and unsigned version? I'm not aware of those issues, what are they?
>
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 18:33:27 UTC, John Sheehan wrote:
> > No plans to sign it. After all the issues with JSON.NET (http://JSON.NET) being signed and how it plays with NuGet, it's not something I want to do.
>
>
>
--4fd1861b_66334873_41ed
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<div>Please read: <a href=3D=22https://groups.google=
.com/forum/=23=21msg/restsharp/yjGCtOnEYHk/XbKZi0yjN8cJ=22>https://groups=
.google.com/forum/=23=21msg/restsharp/yjGCtOnEYHk/XbKZi0yjN8cJ</a></div>
<div></div>
=20
<p style=3D=22color: =23A0A0A8;=22>On Thursday, June 7, 2=
012 at 17:13, Ivan Gavryliuk wrote:</p>
<blockquote type=3D=22cite=22 style=3D=22border-left-styl=
e:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;=22>
<span><div><div>Could you at least publish signed and=
unsigned version=3F I'm not aware of those issues, what are they=3F<br><=
br>On Tuesday, 24 January 2012 18:33:27 UTC, John Sheehan wrote:<blockqu=
ote type=3D=22cite=22><div>No plans to sign it. After all the issues with=
<a href=3D=22http://JSON.NET=22 target=3D=22=5Fblank=22>JSON.NET</a> bei=
ng signed and how it plays with NuGet, it's not something I want to do.</=
div></blockquote></div></div></span>
=20
=20
=20
=20
</blockquote>
=20
<div>
<br>
</div>
--4fd1861b_66334873_41ed--