Do you have partial indexing on? Without it you would need to search for the entire number (1973.16) after removing "." as a separator.
Partial indexing comes with a performance penalty. With having two digits after the decimal you would also want to change the minimum character number for partial indexing to 2.
In regards to using the "." as a separator...we're results being sorted by relevance? One would think relevance matching would put the result you were looking for at the top.
Another suggestion would be to create a field specifically for the accession numbers and show the field in the simple search box.
You might also want to consider configuring the search to not treat numbers as resource IDs.
Sent from my iPhone
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ResourceSpace" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
resourcespac...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>