I'm not necessarily opposed to including some of response_for in RC, just
wary of featuritis. I already wish there was a little more distinction in
RC between the identification of REST resources versus helpers for
generating URLs. I see them as generally distinct with some overlap.
Response_for seems very distinct (to the point that I have never needed it)
from either of these, and I would hope that it remains that way.
Short version: -1 if all it does is support an xml_response => true feature.
-Chris
Chris Hapgood
Phone: +1 434 989 8584
Skype: chris.hapgood
Email: cc...@hapgoods.com
Hi List,
resources_controller_for :posts
Cheers,
Ian
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: 02/02/2008
13:50
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1256 - Release Date: 02/02/2008
13:50