Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
reformcard
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion technical tracking...
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Johnny Ryan  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14 2011, 5:45 am
From: Johnny Ryan <johnnyry...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 14 2011 5:45 am
Subject: Re: technical tracking...
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hi Will

Committee activity does continue through part of the recess, but there
is no activity in August (see for example http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?DocID=12479)

Travel through a single committee should - presumably - be a single
step, yes, unless you have an alternate idea?

Johnny

On Feb 14, 9:53 am, Will Knott <W...@WillKnott.ie> wrote:

> I thought the process was that committees worked during the recesses
> (the summer break at any rate). If that is the case, then depending on
> where the process is then there shouldn't be a gap.

> Or is "Committee Stage" a single step in the Gantt?

> Will

> On 13 February 2011 19:12, Johnny Ryan <johnnyry...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Gerry and I have been thinking about how anticipated gaps in the
> > progress of a bill should be represented
> > For example, the summer break when the dail + senate are not in
> > session, should the bar representing whatever stage the bill was at
> > continue, or should there be a gap?
> > My instinct is that we should have have gaps only when unexpected
> > problems arise - so that a visitor to the site can immediately see
> > where progress has been stalled - but ideas welcome from anybody who
> > is used to working with Gantt and/or legislation.

> > Johnny


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google