Is Amazon PIOPS Really Better than Standard EBS for Redis ? - Redis DB

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion Is Amazon PIOPS Really Better than Standard EBS for Redis ?
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simeon Simeonov <s...@swoop.com>
To: redis-db@googlegroups.com
Cc: Mason Jones <masono...@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <18844053-5fca-4fec-8e40-44eb18afa557@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <-2926915132385360211@unknownmsgid>
References: <-2926915132385360211@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: Is Amazon PIOPS Really Better than Standard EBS for Redis ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_756_14487373.1350782446331"

------=_Part_756_14487373.1350782446331
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_757_18329774.1350782446331"

------=_Part_757_18329774.1350782446331
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yiftach, we've seen the same behavior for non-Redis but still sequential=20
loads, supporting your findings.

On Thursday, October 4, 2012 3:19:57 PM UTC-4, Yiftach wrote:
>
> Thank, you are right, I guess it is strongly related to sequential write
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 4 =D7=91=D7=90=D7=95=D7=A7 2012, at 19:32, Mason Jones <maso...@gmail.=
com <javascript:>>=20
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for this, very nice. We did a similar benchmarking for our
> PostgreSQL utilization on EC2, and for what it's worth we found that
> IOPS was much, much better than standard EBS. We had similar findings,
> though, that for sequential writes (and reads to a great extent) the
> difference was smaller.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Yiftach Shoolman
> <yiftach....@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> We have just published a blog that compares the performance of Amazon
>
> standard EBS to PIOPS EBS. See more details here:
>
>
> https://garantiadata.com/blog/is-amazon-piops-really-better-than-standard=
-ebs
>
>
> IMO - it should be relevant to anyway who runs on AWS and use one of the
>
> Redis data-persistence options over EBS
>
>
> --
>
>
> Yiftach Shoolman
>
> +972-54-7634621
>
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>
> "Redis DB" group.
>
> To post to this group, send email to redi...@googlegroups.com<javascript:=
>
> .
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> redis-db+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>
> For more options, visit this group at
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/redis-db?hl=3Den.
>
>
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups=
=20
> "Redis DB" group.
> To post to this group, send email to redi...@googlegroups.com<javascript:=
>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20
> redis-db+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at=20
> http://groups.google.com/group/redis-db?hl=3Den.
>
>
------=_Part_757_18329774.1350782446331
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yiftach, we've seen the same behavior for non-Redis but still sequential lo=
ads, supporting your findings.<br><br>On Thursday, October 4, 2012 3:19:57 =
PM UTC-4, Yiftach wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: =
0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div b=
gcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div><div style=3D"text-align:left;direction:ltr">Thank,=
 you are right, I guess it is strongly related to sequential write</div><br=
>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 4 =D7=91=D7=90=D7=95=D7=A7 2012, at 1=
9:32, Mason Jones &lt;<a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfusca=
ted-mailto=3D"9_3sCzTIoDIJ">maso...@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br></div><div></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span>Thanks for this, =
very nice. We did a similar benchmarking for our</span><br><span>PostgreSQL=
 utilization on EC2, and for what it's worth we found that</span><br>
<span>IOPS was much, much better than standard EBS. We had similar findings=
,</span><br><span>though, that for sequential writes (and reads to a great =
extent) the</span><br><span>difference was smaller.</span><br><span></span>=
<br>
<span></span><br><span>On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Yiftach Shoolman</sp=
an><br><span>&lt;<a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-m=
ailto=3D"9_3sCzTIoDIJ">yiftach....@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><br><bloc=
kquote type=3D"cite"><span>We have just published a blog that compares the =
performance of Amazon</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>standard EBS to PIOPS EBS. See=
 more details here:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>=
<a href=3D"https://garantiadata.com/blog/is-amazon-piops-really-better-than=
-standard-ebs" target=3D"_blank">https://garantiadata.com/blog/<wbr>is-amaz=
on-piops-really-better-<wbr>than-standard-ebs</a></span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><block=
quote type=3D"cite"><span>IMO - it should be relevant to anyway who runs on=
 AWS and use one of the</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><s=
pan>Redis data-persistence options over EBS</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><block=
quote type=3D"cite"><span>--</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cit=
e"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>Yiftach Sh=
oolman</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>+972-54-7634621</span><br></bl=
ockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquot=
e type=3D"cite"><span>--</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><=
span>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro=
ups</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>"Redis DB" group.</span><br></=
blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>To post to this group, send emai=
l to <a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"9_3=
sCzTIoDIJ">redi...@googlegroups.com</a>.</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>To unsubscribe from this group=
, send email to</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span><a h=
ref=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"9_3sCzTIoDIJ=
">redis-db+u...@<wbr>googlegroups.com</a>.</span><br>
</blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span>For more options, visit this g=
roup at</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><span><a href=3D"h=
ttp://groups.google.com/group/redis-db?hl=3Den" target=3D"_blank">http://gr=
oups.google.com/<wbr>group/redis-db?hl=3Den</a>.</span><br>
</blockquote><span></span><br><span>-- </span><br><span>You received this m=
essage because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Redis DB" group.</s=
pan><br><span>To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"javascript:" =
target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"9_3sCzTIoDIJ">redi...@googlegrou=
ps.com</a>.</span><br>
<span>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to <a href=3D"javascript:"=
 target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"9_3sCzTIoDIJ">redis-db+u...@<wb=
r>googlegroups.com</a>.</span><br><span>For more options, visit this group =
at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/redis-db?hl=3Den" target=3D"_b=
lank">http://groups.google.com/<wbr>group/redis-db?hl=3Den</a>.</span><br>
<span></span><br></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote>
------=_Part_757_18329774.1350782446331--

------=_Part_756_14487373.1350782446331--
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
