Received: by 10.205.123.145 with SMTP id gk17mr183163bkc.2.1349981922782;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: redis-db@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.155.71 with SMTP id r7ls2557185bkw.6.gmail; Thu, 11 Oct
 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.123.145 with SMTP id gk17mr183149bkc.2.1349981917282;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.123.145 with SMTP id gk17mr183148bkc.2.1349981917268;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <anti...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f48.google.com (mail-bk0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v13si640882bkw.0.2012.10.11.11.58.37
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of anti...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.48;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of anti...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=anti...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ik5so964733bkc.7
        for <redis-db@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=CDMp9w5XhOjywP0yOtBntURWg/2UqiyfQ/lLj/8XySw=;
        b=TYpWSMkiI0iCjZdJZiOOHeWucEcV7aOORDaN3X0yg8PHoNQIhMyPV17S1IzTahkpfH
         qmTV97WKJ5eN31euR5bFIMLPV0CMhEdc4F5NoePgjX3Vla2nJRFYAKTwKZMrD8SvYluo
         MznR8IcVDNYoq6pGw1//3Swe4NZx3jakxFsrghyjs2SCqgJdumlTMplRxBE2p38p4QpT
         +lPDD/GJ+pQ1ETgSHgJlicyFIV5oHewwVKDNgMXNgy9xFWvIv0fRUNNGG/DS+oWvIEdm
         fGm/LijX3G1vBj+Pctj6hZpU1OswUKb+NPSJ2/8hP+7+Fau/mzontZM+9ZCJNyGBZYUL
         Z7aQ==
Received: by 10.204.9.3 with SMTP id j3mr698444bkj.15.1349981917139; Thu, 11
 Oct 2012 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.127.72 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b33d0c7d-d412-4f6c-899c-21e371e427f3@googlegroups.com>
References: <256f04e7-7080-4323-b60c-0873f259cd59@googlegroups.com> <b33d0c7d-d412-4f6c-899c-21e371e427f3@googlegroups.com>
From: Salvatore Sanfilippo <anti...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:58:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+XzkVc0tQ3qiNkygFV-BUciOA7sgrSVekfFQ97EdkmviuP...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bad perfomance of mass insertion to Redis DB with Sider .NET client
To: redis-db@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:42 PM, =D0=9C=D0=B0=D0=BA=D1=81 =D0=91=D0=B0=D1=
=80=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B5=D0=B2 <maxten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have only one strange thing. Why does the standard benchmark show not s=
o
> good results? It shows about 4000 SET operations per second...

You mean redis-benchmark? This is odd indeed.

Salvatore

--=20
Salvatore 'antirez' Sanfilippo
open source developer - VMware
http://invece.org

Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology
because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defence
against complexity.
       =E2=80=94 David Gelernter