Is Amazon PIOPS Really Better than Standard EBS for Redis ?

[Yiftach Shoolman]

We have just published a blog that compares the performance of Amazon standard EBS to PIOPS EBS. See more details here: 

https://garantiadata.com/blog/is-amazon-piops-really-better-than-standard-ebs

IMO - it should be relevant to anyway who runs on AWS and use one of the Redis data-persistence options over EBS

--

Yiftach Shoolman
+972-54-7634621

[Salvatore Sanfilippo]

Awesome work Yiftach, thank you for sharing.

Cheers,
Salvatore

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Redis DB" group.
> To post to this group, send email to redi...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> redis-db+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redis-db?hl=en.



--
Salvatore 'antirez' Sanfilippo
open source developer - VMware
http://invece.org

Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology
because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defence
against complexity.
— David Gelernter

[Mason Jones]

Thanks for this, very nice. We did a similar benchmarking for our
PostgreSQL utilization on EC2, and for what it's worth we found that
IOPS was much, much better than standard EBS. We had similar findings,
though, that for sequential writes (and reads to a great extent) the
difference was smaller.

[Yiftach Shoolman]

Thank, you are right, I guess it is strongly related to sequential write

Sent from my iPhone