Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Redbot does not check asset as expected
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Structure  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10 2010, 5:00 am
From: Structure <bruvo...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 5:00 am
Subject: Re: Redbot does not check asset as expected
Indeed it does. Thanks very much!

On Mar 10, 3:43 pm, Sam Katakouzinos <sam.katakouzi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It does work!

> Thank you so much for making this happen.
> Having this functionality working makes this such an amazing tool.

> Cheers!

> On Mar 10, 4:12 pm, Mark Nottingham <m...@mnot.net> wrote:

> > Try this again; should be fixed.

> > Cheers,

> > On 02/03/2010, at 4:06 PM, Structure wrote:

> > > For the screen shot:
> > >http://drop.io/redbot_structure

> > > On Mar 2, 1:59 pm, Structure <bruvo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Below is the link that used to show the extended view with analysis of
> > >> each object on the page. Passing the query parameters descend=True and
> > >> uri=http%3A//www.domain.com/path/file.extasbelow.

> > >>http://redbot.org/?descend=True&uri=http%3A//gorillaartfare.com/

> > >> This request is returning a 200 Response so I assume there is
> > >> something to parse.

> > >> If descend=False is specified then I get the same result, if that
> > >> matters.

> > >> I did not take a screen shot of the out before now, but did notice
> > >> today that the behavior seemed different.

> > >> On Mar 2, 1:09 pm, Mark Nottingham <m...@mnot.net> wrote:

> > >>> Do you have a URL that shows this? The functionality should be the same...

> > >>> Cheers,

> > >>> On 02/03/2010, at 2:34 PM, Structure wrote:

> > >>>> Interesting, when I checked RED on Feb 25th I was able to use the
> > >>>> "check links" function to have RED analyze all objects on the page.

> > >>>> Was this functionality removed/changed? Git-hub shows an update on
> > >>>> 2010-02-25 that coincides with my last use of that feature.

> > >>>> Currently, "check assets" returns a check for the current page and
> > >>>> none of the contained assets.

> > >>>> On Feb 27, 9:24 am, Sam Katakouzinos <sam.katakouzi...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> Sorry I already posted this on Twitter (http://j.mp/ccqvYv) before I
> > >>>>> found this group!

> > >>>>> In you post (http://j.mp/bnTU8E) you have a link called 'check links'.
> > >>>>> Today I see a link called 'check assets'.
> > >>>>> I assume they are the same in terms of functionality.

> > >>>>> When I click on 'check links' it does not check as the post describes.

> > >>>>> May you please have it check all the linked assets on a Web page?

> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Sam Katakouzinos

> > >>>>> P.S. I'm glad I found you. IRCache checking no longer works (R.I.P.)
> > >>>>> and this is a great enhancement!

> > >>> --
> > >>> Mark Nottingham    http://www.mnot.net/

> > --
> > Mark Nottingham    http://www.mnot.net/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.