On Saturday, February 25, 2012 2:24:18 PM UTC+1, kenwshmt wrote:
> progress bars have been historically inaccurate, maybe just a byte
> count vs file size identifier?
> Half the file size is more or less half of the content.
> On Feb 24, 8:36 am, Christoph Heindl <christoph.hei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that idea! I've put that onto my todo list, but won't be
> added
> > in the near future, since it requires a major refactoring of the current
> > file storage format (we don't know how many frames are left, we read
> until
> > the stream has ended :)
> > I think we should consider a public issue tracker hmm...
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 2:24:18 PM UTC+1, kenwshmt wrote:
> progress bars have been historically inaccurate, maybe just a byte
> count vs file size identifier?
> Half the file size is more or less half of the content.
> On Feb 24, 8:36 am, Christoph Heindl <christoph.hei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that idea! I've put that onto my todo list, but won't be
> added
> > in the near future, since it requires a major refactoring of the current
> > file storage format (we don't know how many frames are left, we read
> until
> > the stream has ended :)
> > I think we should consider a public issue tracker hmm...
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 2:24:18 PM UTC+1, kenwshmt wrote:
> progress bars have been historically inaccurate, maybe just a byte
> count vs file size identifier?
> Half the file size is more or less half of the content.
> On Feb 24, 8:36 am, Christoph Heindl <christoph.hei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that idea! I've put that onto my todo list, but won't be
> added
> > in the near future, since it requires a major refactoring of the current
> > file storage format (we don't know how many frames are left, we read
> until
> > the stream has ended :)
> > I think we should consider a public issue tracker hmm...
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 2:24:18 PM UTC+1, kenwshmt wrote:
> progress bars have been historically inaccurate, maybe just a byte
> count vs file size identifier?
> Half the file size is more or less half of the content.
> On Feb 24, 8:36 am, Christoph Heindl <christoph.hei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that idea! I've put that onto my todo list, but won't be
> added
> > in the near future, since it requires a major refactoring of the current
> > file storage format (we don't know how many frames are left, we read
> until
> > the stream has ended :)
> > I think we should consider a public issue tracker hmm...