Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Crooked Edmonton Cops Screw Up-Now Will Re-issue P

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Skookum

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 2:45:16 PM2/16/08
to
On Feb 16, 2:30 pm, Mou...@remailer.metacolo.com,
Br...@remailer.metacolo.com wrote:
> Newspapers today report that the crooked Edmonton cops fraudulently
> issued 4000 photoradar tickets, with the wrong cop's name on them!!
> Apparently about 2000 idiots paid the tickets without any dispute.
> Now the crooked cops will re-issue the fraudulent tickets, this time
> with the correct crooked cop's name on them.
> Apparently the screw-up was supposedly made by the US firm that will be
> losing the photo-radar ticket deal with the city.
> Critics are advising people getting the second ticket to fight it.
> No wonder Deadmonton Alberta has such an unsavoury reputation!!

Oh the horror of it! How could anyone go on living having received a
ticket with the wrong cop's name on it? Imagine that silly people are
keeping themselves busy worrying about global warming or Darfur when
such malevolent injustice is afoot in Edmonton.

JohnBuchan

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 3:05:10 PM2/16/08
to
When crooked cops get more than $400,000 to which they are not legally
entitled, that is something about which to be concerned!!

Particularly when it involves the US photo-radar company that was charged with
BRIBING local crooked cops, to get the contract in the first place!

Is there no end to crooked Edmonton cops?


On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:45:16 -0800 (PST), Skookum <nd...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>On Feb 16, 2:30 pm, Mou...@remailer.metacolo.com,
>Br...@remailer.metacolo.com wrote:
>> Newspapers today report that the crooked Edmonton cops fraudulently

>> issued 3400 photoradar tickets, with the wrong cop's name on them!!

Kenneth McVay OBC

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 3:56:20 PM2/16/08
to
In article <a69585bc-0451-4bb2...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,

Poor Grosvenor - reduced to this...

--
"Streicher commit suicide while in the Nuremberg Jail But you
people did hang him after that"
(Kurt Knoll, Kitimat, B.C.'s Leading Revisionist Moron)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org/

The Doctor

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 4:11:12 PM2/16/08
to
In article <13rejfk...@corp.supernews.com>,

All that is needed now is to cleanfeed Grosvenor and his ilk
off the net. As your news server to run cleanfeed.
IT is ffree and support is there.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! On March 3rd,
Alberta! Time for a change and beware Alliance in PC clothing. Vote Liberal!

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 5:56:24 PM2/16/08
to
On Feb 16, 2:11 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <13rejfkqvosd...@corp.supernews.com>,

> Kenneth McVay OBC <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <a69585bc-0451-4bb2-84b5-3d4cd19e2...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,


If it's FREE who did you pay $400 to?

@poster.com Top Poster

unread,
Feb 16, 2008, 4:12:40 PM2/16/08
to
It is $400.00 and you have proved that it is a defective product

--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous


"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fp7jhg$jcm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

catchme

unread,
Mar 14, 2008, 2:42:10 PM3/14/08
to

if the name of an officer who was not present appears on the ticket,
then that officer can not verify that in fact he or she was present at
the time.
This is important if in fact facts of the ticket were in dispute by the
person in reciept of the ticket.
Whenever an officer stops you- even so little as to tell you to fix a
tail light, you are considered arrested.
If you choose to dispute this arrest, that is your right- but you should
do so with your arresting officer in attendance.
Therefore, who is this third person- this other cop whose name appears
on the ticket?
a third party, entered after the fact?

0 new messages