Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NYT's Christopher Clarey on Fed's FO decision

83 views
Skip to first unread message

Carey

unread,
May 16, 2017, 12:34:59 PM5/16/17
to
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/sports/tennis/roger-federer-french-open.html?_r=0

TT

unread,
May 16, 2017, 1:28:51 PM5/16/17
to
16.5.2017, 19:34, Carey kirjoitti:
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/sports/tennis/roger-federer-french-open.html?_r=0
>

NYT lol

calim...@gmx.de

unread,
May 16, 2017, 7:16:13 PM5/16/17
to
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 6:34:59 PM UTC+2, Carey wrote:
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/sports/tennis/roger-federer-french-open.html?_r=0


NYT?

Lol ...


Max

Gracchus

unread,
May 16, 2017, 7:18:08 PM5/16/17
to
Would you prefer the Washington Post?

arahim

unread,
May 16, 2017, 7:33:48 PM5/16/17
to
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-7, Carey wrote:
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/sports/tennis/roger-federer-french-open.html?_r=0

Interesting that he is still talking about preserving for many years to come and plans to return to FO next year.

Jason White

unread,
May 16, 2017, 9:16:16 PM5/16/17
to
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 9:34:59 AM UTC-7, Carey wrote:
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/sports/tennis/roger-federer-french-open.html?_r=0

He's beyond obsessed with eighth Wimbledon title. He probably has practiced on clay for a millisecond. Why would he play the French? Nadal is part of it, but Federer wouldn't even get to that stage. A host of players could knock him out.

Whisper

unread,
May 17, 2017, 7:27:14 AM5/17/17
to
Maybe, but when the ultimate tennis prize is still alive he really
should be giving it a go.


0 new messages