Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Rankings, 10-10-2010

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Fan

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 5:38:53 AM10/12/10
to
I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
posted the earlier rankings.
If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
Nadal - 12
Federer - 7
It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)

1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 12,390 0 20
2 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,145 0 21
3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,735 0 20
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 5,125 0 19
5 Soderling, Robin (SWE) 4,825 0 24
6 Davydenko, Nikolay (RUS) 3,945 0 25
7 Berdych, Tomas (CZE) 3,715 0 24
8 Youzhny, Mikhail (RUS) 3,345 0 23
9 Verdasco, Fernando (ESP) 3,330 0 25
10 Ferrer, David (ESP) 3,280 1 23
11 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,225 -1 21
12 Melzer, Jurgen (AUT) 2,560 1 26
13 Tsonga, Jo-Wilfried (FRA) 2,390 -1 21
14 Monfils, Gael (FRA) 2,370 1 24
15 Cilic, Marin (CRO) 2,330 -1 24
16 Almagro, Nicolas (ESP) 2,210 0 27
17 Ljubicic, Ivan (CRO) 2,190 0 24
18 Baghdatis, Marcos (CYP) 2,030 0 27
19 Fish, Mardy (USA) 1,991 0 20
20 Isner, John (USA) 1,850 2 24
21 Wawrinka, Stanislas (SUI) 1,765 -1 21
22 Lopez, Feliciano (ESP) 1,685 1 26
23 Montanes, Albert (ESP) 1,610 1 29
24 Querrey, Sam (USA) 1,545 -3 26
25 Bellucci, Thomaz (BRA) 1,455 2 26

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 6:01:36 AM10/12/10
to

Djoker doing well too, I would like to see Youzhny at the London
Masters. Also does anyone know if 12,390 points is the most, ever
attained, in history?

john

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 7:12:57 AM10/12/10
to

"Fan" <Turnag...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e22c4c07-07d6-4587...@t8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

>I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
> posted the earlier rankings.
> If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
> number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
> Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
> Nadal - 12
> Federer - 7
> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)

If you want to cry Fan go ahead you can have my hanky and mind you I just
blew my nose with it..


reilloc

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 9:25:05 AM10/12/10
to
On 10/12/2010 4:38 AM, Fan wrote:

> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)

That's an interesting figure of speech, "reach for the silk cord,"
tossed off casually as though the writer routinely keeps such a thing
close to his hand. I can't say I know anyone who'd do or say such a thing.

LNC

Sakari Lund

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 9:55:27 AM10/12/10
to
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:38:53 -0700 (PDT), Fan
<Turnag...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
>posted the earlier rankings.

This is much better time to post the rankings. Now you only have the
date wrong

Fan

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:00:30 AM10/12/10
to
Must you carry on with your stupidity and ignorance as if was a badge
of honor?
Alibaba, unless he is just as stupid as you are, would know what to do
with his silk cord.


Iceberg

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:24:26 AM10/12/10
to
On 12 Oct, 14:55, Sakari Lund <sakari.l...@welho.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:38:53 -0700 (PDT), Fan
>
> <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
> >posted the earlier rankings.
>
> This is much better time to post the rankings. Now you only have the
> date wrong

how has he got the date wrong?

Sakari Lund

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:27:07 AM10/12/10
to

10-10 was Sunday. Rankings are updated on Mondays. Always, but
especially this week, when the final was finished on Monday.

RzR

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:28:23 AM10/12/10
to
On 12.10.2010 11:38, Fan wrote:
> I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
> posted the earlier rankings.
> If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
> number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
> Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
> Nadal - 12
> Federer - 7
> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
>

lol how delusional and stupid are you people?

do you really think anyone thought federer would stay on top forever?

this is normal course of events...sadly, if federer was actually to stay
on top untill he is 40, when he dropped from that spot, some stupid
retard like yourself would actually be there and said:"AHA!!! I TOLD YOU
SO!!!"

RzR

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:28:58 AM10/12/10
to
On 12.10.2010 12:01, Iceberg wrote:
> Also does anyone know if 12,390 points is the most, ever
> attained, in history?

in the new counting system, yes

Inglourious Basterd

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:52:10 AM10/12/10
to
On 12 Oct, 15:28, RzR <2r4z...@gmail.com> wrote:

> do you really think anyone thought federer would stay on top forever?

No, but many thought he would stay there longer than Sampras. Turns
out that Pete still holds the record for most weeks and yrs as #1.
This annoys Fedfuckers to a frightful degree!

RzR

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 10:59:32 AM10/12/10
to

good for pete...it would be a shame if people totally forgot him so soon :)

TT

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 11:11:32 AM10/12/10
to
Fan wrote:
> I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
> posted the earlier rankings.
> If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
> number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
> Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
> Nadal - 12
> Federer - 7
> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
>
> 1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 12,390 0 20
> 2 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,145 0 21
> 3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,735 0 20

Yes, Rafa leads with 5000+ points - same with Race. That's over 2 slams
and 1 M1000 to win for the 2nd best - provided Rafa wouldn't play!

RACE:

1 Rafael Nadal 11,360
2 Roger Federer 6,025
3 Novak Djokovic 5,165


Maybe rest of the tour should get double points from every tournament to
make it competitive?

reilloc

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 11:21:34 AM10/12/10
to

The only silk cord we know anybody has is the one you seem to own,
otherwise you wouldn't mention it. I probably don't really want to know,
but, are you going to be working into your future posts other items from
your auto-erotica collection?

LNC

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 11:22:40 AM10/12/10
to
On 12 Oct, 15:28, RzR <2r4z...@gmail.com> wrote:

oh I'll happily contend that many many Fedfans said he would stay on
the top spot for literally EVER. I specifically remember some of them
saying to me back in 2006 that he would possibly NEVER lose, that he
may just go on winning and then would retire. Also I have to say Ali
(sometime Dave) still say this is the case, he didn't even lose
Wimbledon 2008 etc

RzR

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 11:33:20 AM10/12/10
to
On 12.10.2010 17:22, Iceberg wrote:
> On 12 Oct, 15:28, RzR<2r4z...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12.10.2010 11:38, Fan wrote:
>>
>>> I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
>>> posted the earlier rankings.
>>> If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
>>> number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
>>> Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
>>> Nadal - 12
>>> Federer - 7
>>> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
>>
>> lol how delusional and stupid are you people?
>>
>> do you really think anyone thought federer would stay on top forever?
>>
>> this is normal course of events...sadly, if federer was actually to stay
>> on top untill he is 40, when he dropped from that spot, some stupid
>> retard like yourself would actually be there and said:"AHA!!! I TOLD YOU
>> SO!!!"
>
> oh I'll happily contend that many many Fedfans said he would stay on
> the top spot for literally EVER.

lol ok that excludes me :)

I specifically remember some of them
> saying to me back in 2006 that he would possibly NEVER lose, that he
> may just go on winning and then would retire. Also I have to say Ali
> (sometime Dave) still say this is the case, he didn't even lose
> Wimbledon 2008 etc

:)

topspin

unread,
Oct 12, 2010, 5:00:11 PM10/12/10
to
On Oct 12, 10:38 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
> posted the earlier rankings.
> If we divide the ranking points by 1000 and round them, we get a
> number close to Nadal-Federer 14-7 h2h.
> Ranking points divided by 1000 and rounded
> Nadal - 12
> Federer - 7
> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
>
> 1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 12,390 0 20
> 2 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,145 0 21
> 3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,735 0 20
> 4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 5,125 0 19

Tempes fugit....

12/10/2009

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 11,255
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 8,945
3 Murray, Andy (GBR) 8,390
4 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,740

13/10/2008

1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 7,000
2 Federer, Roger (SUI) 5,930
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 4,725
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 2,995

08/10/2007

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 7,355
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 5,385
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 4,145
4 Davydenko, Nikolay (RUS) 3,255

09/10/2006

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 7,370
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 4,625
3 Ljubicic, Ivan (CRO) 3,190
4 Nalbandian, David (ARG) 2,900

10/10/2005

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,9759
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 4,475
3 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,115
4 Safin, Marat (RUS) 3,015

11/10/2004

1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,685
2 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,780
3 Hewitt, Lleyton (AUS) 3,065
4 Coria, Guillermo (ARG) 2,820

13/10/2003

1 Ferrero, Juan Carlos (ESP) 4,195
2 Roddick, Andy (USA) 4,165
3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 3,825
4 Agassi, Andre (USA) 3,670

14/10/2002

1 Hewitt, Lleyton (AUS) 4,465
2 Agassi, Andre (USA) 2,875
3 Haas, Tommy (USA) 2,665
4 Safin, Marat (RUS) 2,620

09/10/2000

1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,739
2 Safin, Marat (RUS) 3,537
3 Kuerten, Gustavo (BRA) 3,358
4 Norman, Magnus (SWE) 3,098

10/10/1999

1 Agassi, Andre (USA) 4,339
2 Kafelnikov, Yevgeny (RUS) 3,839
3 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,544
4 Martin, Todd (USA) 2,969

12/10/1998

1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,015
2 Rafter, Patrick (AUS) 3,575
3 Rios, Marcelo (CHI) 3,435
4 Moya, Carlos (ESP) 2,962

13/10/1997

1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,291
2 Chang, Michael (USA) 3,385
3 Rafter, Patrick (AUS) 2,889
4 Ivanisevic, Goran (CRO) 2,581

14/10/1996
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,740
2 Chang, Michael (USA) 3,822
3 Muster, Thomas (AUT) 3,612
4 Kafelnikov, Yevgeny (RUS) 3,253

09/10/1995

1 Agassi, Andre (USA) 5,400
2 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,959
3 Muster, Thomas (AUT) 4,072
4 Becker, Boris (GER) 3,331


10/10/1994

1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,884
2 Ivanisevic, Goran (CRO) 3,125
3 Stich, Michael (GER) 3,092
4 Bruguera, Sergi (ESP) 2,727

11/10/1993
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,925
2 Courier, Jim (USA) 3,759
3 Becker, Boris (GER) 2,617
4 Stich, Michael (GER) 2,598

12/10/1992
1 Courier, Jim (USA) 3,574
2 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,366
3 Edberg, Stefan (SWE) 3,252
4 Chang, Michael (USA) 2,400

Fan

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 2:28:58 AM10/13/10
to
It appears that in your stupid, perverted mind everything has
perverted sexual meaning. Do not judge others by you own gutter
thinking.
The silk cord reference was for Alibaba’s benefit who appears to be a
Turk. In the glory days of Ottoman Empire when a Turkish official did
not perform to the Sultan’s satisfaction he sent him a silk cord and
he was obliged to use it commit suicide.
It is similar to the Japanese hara-kiri and not a bad a way of
handling disgraced officials.
I wonder if Dave, who posts less and less with Federer getting his ass
kicked more and more would prefer the silk cord or hara-kiri for
Cheney and himself.
However, it is better if you stay with your pervert fantasies because
rational thinking would be too much of a shock to your feeble brain.

reilloc

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 10:55:43 AM10/13/10
to
On 10/13/2010 1:28 AM, Fan wrote:
> On Oct 12, 5:21 pm, reilloc<reil...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 9:00 AM, Fan wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 12, 3:25 pm, reilloc<reil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2010 4:38 AM, Fan wrote:
>>
>>>>> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
>>
>>>> That's an interesting figure of speech, "reach for the silk cord,"
>>>> tossed off casually as though the writer routinely keeps such a thing
>>>> close to his hand. I can't say I know anyone who'd do or say such a thing.
>>
>>> Must you carry on with your stupidity and ignorance as if was a badge
>>> of honor?
>>> Alibaba, unless he is just as stupid as you are, would know what to do
>>> with his silk cord.
>>
>> The only silk cord we know anybody has is the one you seem to own,
>> otherwise you wouldn't mention it. I probably don't really want to know,
>> but, are you going to be working into your future posts other items from
>> your auto-erotica collection?
>>
> It appears that in your stupid, perverted mind everything has
> perverted sexual meaning. Do not judge others by you own gutter
> thinking.
> The silk cord reference was for Alibaba�s benefit who appears to be a

> Turk. In the glory days of Ottoman Empire when a Turkish official did
> not perform to the Sultan�s satisfaction he sent him a silk cord and

> he was obliged to use it commit suicide.
> It is similar to the Japanese hara-kiri and not a bad a way of
> handling disgraced officials.
> I wonder if Dave, who posts less and less with Federer getting his ass
> kicked more and more would prefer the silk cord or hara-kiri for
> Cheney and himself.
> However, it is better if you stay with your pervert fantasies because
> rational thinking would be too much of a shock to your feeble brain.

The "glory days," eh? You take somewhat too seriously the banter here
and the professional athletic careers of people who you'll never know
and who wouldn't associate with you if it meant crediting them with a
Wimbledon win. Fittingly, you can't appreciate your own deteriorated
psychological makeup.

Consider, nobody here is going to kill himself if his favorite tennis
player loses. I know that's probably impossible for you to understand
but accept it, arguendo, and maybe talk it over with a few of the other
sanitation workers and see what they say.

LNC

Fan

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 11:12:24 AM10/13/10
to
On Oct 13, 4:55 pm, reilloc <reil...@gmail.com> wrote:
(...)

> Consider, nobody here is going to kill himself if his favorite tennis
> player loses.

What if the tennis player you worship loses not only once but also
repeatedly? Someone like you may just want to end his miserable,
useless existance. I am here to help you:
I do not recommend the Turkish silk cord to someone as stupid as you
are because you do not know how to tie a knot. The Japanese hara-kiri
would not work for you either because you would just stab your toe.
I would recommend an idiot’s special just for you. Hold your breath
until you faint. It will not kill you but the people around you would
appreciate not having to put up with your foul breath.

Inglourious Basterd

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 11:39:29 AM10/13/10
to
This is a very strange conversation, sirs.

reilloc

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 2:55:51 PM10/13/10
to
On 10/13/2010 10:12 AM, Fan wrote:
> On Oct 13, 4:55 pm, reilloc<reil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (...)
>> Consider, nobody here is going to kill himself if his favorite tennis
>> player loses.
>
> What if the tennis player you worship loses not only once but also
> repeatedly? Someone like you may just want to end his miserable,
> useless existance. I am here to help you:
> I do not recommend the Turkish silk cord to someone as stupid as you
> are because you do not know how to tie a knot. The Japanese hara-kiri
> would not work for you either because you would just stab your toe.
> I would recommend an idiot�s special just for you. Hold your breath

> until you faint. It will not kill you but the people around you would
> appreciate not having to put up with your foul breath.


You see, there's the problem. You think somebody's talking about
religion, about matters of faith and spirituality but almost everybody
else knows it's *tennis* that's the overarching subject. Sure, there are
a couple of bizarre headcases similar to you around here. Guys who've
only seen tennis played on TV and who conclude that there's some
mysticism to it.

You'd best save your talk of *worship* for times and places where it's
appropriate for you. Like when you're fondling your steak knife
collection or folding and putting away your mother's intimate garments;
doing those things we can all visualize your doing because the way you
talk has branded you an incurable psychotic.

Now, go ahead and say something more. Something about how there is a god
and his name is (fill in the blank with the name of some tennis player
you've heard mentioned). Talk a little more about ritual suicide and go
out of your way to racially disparage another poster regarding his
national origin. Go on...we're breathless with anticipation.

LNC

reilloc

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 2:58:13 PM10/13/10
to
On 10/13/2010 10:39 AM, Inglourious Basterd wrote:
> This is a very strange conversation, sirs.

Isn't it, though? Have you ever known a guy so hung up on such aberrant
notions of honor? He's like some kind of Klingon ball boy.

LNC

drew

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 3:30:55 PM10/13/10
to

What a strange person.

Is there somebody else there we can talk to?

jdeluise

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 3:32:20 PM10/13/10
to

On 13-Oct-2010, reilloc <rei...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Isn't it, though? Have you ever known a guy so hung up on such aberrant
> notions of honor? He's like some kind of Klingon ball boy.

Have you ever noticed that he never uses contractions?

drew

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 3:36:30 PM10/13/10
to
On Oct 13, 2:28 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> It appears that in your stupid, perverted mind everything has
> perverted sexual meaning.

Not necessarily perverted sex but I'd rather think about sex than
suicide.

reilloc

unread,
Oct 13, 2010, 3:49:23 PM10/13/10
to

Hadn't noticed. Maybe his "'" key's broken or he has no little finger on
his right hand?

LNC

Fan

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 2:49:30 AM10/14/10
to
On Oct 13, 8:55 pm, reilloc <reil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/2010 10:12 AM, Fan wrote:
>
> > On Oct 13, 4:55 pm, reilloc<reil...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > (...)
> >> Consider, nobody here is going to kill himself if his favorite tennis
> >> player loses.
>
> > What if the tennis player you worship loses not only once but also
> > repeatedly? Someone like you may just want to end his miserable,
> > useless existance. I am here to help you:
> > I do not recommend the Turkish silk cord to someone as stupid as you
> > are because you do not know how to tie a knot. The Japanese hara-kiri
> > would not work for you either because you would just stab your toe.
> > I would recommend an idiot’s special just for you. Hold your breath

> > until you faint. It will not kill you but the people around you would
> > appreciate not having to put up with your foul breath.
>
> You see, there's the problem. You think somebody's talking about
> religion, about matters of faith and spirituality but almost everybody
> else knows it's *tennis* that's the overarching subject. Sure, there are
> a couple of bizarre headcases similar to you around here. Guys who've
> only seen tennis played on TV and who conclude that there's some
> mysticism to it.
>
> You'd best save your talk of *worship* for times and places where it's
> appropriate for you. Like when you're fondling your steak knife
> collection or folding and putting away your mother's intimate garments;
> doing those things we can all visualize your doing because the way you
> talk has branded you an incurable psychotic.

We really did not want to know what you do with your mother and your
mother's intimate garments.
There are lists and there are people who could help you with your
problems but I neither inclined nor qualified to explore your sick,
perverted mind.
Please share your experiences with your mother with your doctor, not
with this list or me. Get help pervert.

0 new messages