1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 12,390 0 20
2 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,145 0 21
3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,735 0 20
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 5,125 0 19
5 Soderling, Robin (SWE) 4,825 0 24
6 Davydenko, Nikolay (RUS) 3,945 0 25
7 Berdych, Tomas (CZE) 3,715 0 24
8 Youzhny, Mikhail (RUS) 3,345 0 23
9 Verdasco, Fernando (ESP) 3,330 0 25
10 Ferrer, David (ESP) 3,280 1 23
11 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,225 -1 21
12 Melzer, Jurgen (AUT) 2,560 1 26
13 Tsonga, Jo-Wilfried (FRA) 2,390 -1 21
14 Monfils, Gael (FRA) 2,370 1 24
15 Cilic, Marin (CRO) 2,330 -1 24
16 Almagro, Nicolas (ESP) 2,210 0 27
17 Ljubicic, Ivan (CRO) 2,190 0 24
18 Baghdatis, Marcos (CYP) 2,030 0 27
19 Fish, Mardy (USA) 1,991 0 20
20 Isner, John (USA) 1,850 2 24
21 Wawrinka, Stanislas (SUI) 1,765 -1 21
22 Lopez, Feliciano (ESP) 1,685 1 26
23 Montanes, Albert (ESP) 1,610 1 29
24 Querrey, Sam (USA) 1,545 -3 26
25 Bellucci, Thomaz (BRA) 1,455 2 26
Djoker doing well too, I would like to see Youzhny at the London
Masters. Also does anyone know if 12,390 points is the most, ever
attained, in history?
If you want to cry Fan go ahead you can have my hanky and mind you I just
blew my nose with it..
> It is enough to make some folks cry or reach for the silk cord :-)
That's an interesting figure of speech, "reach for the silk cord,"
tossed off casually as though the writer routinely keeps such a thing
close to his hand. I can't say I know anyone who'd do or say such a thing.
LNC
>I hope now those poor Federer fans appreciate my kindness when I
>posted the earlier rankings.
This is much better time to post the rankings. Now you only have the
date wrong
how has he got the date wrong?
10-10 was Sunday. Rankings are updated on Mondays. Always, but
especially this week, when the final was finished on Monday.
lol how delusional and stupid are you people?
do you really think anyone thought federer would stay on top forever?
this is normal course of events...sadly, if federer was actually to stay
on top untill he is 40, when he dropped from that spot, some stupid
retard like yourself would actually be there and said:"AHA!!! I TOLD YOU
SO!!!"
in the new counting system, yes
> do you really think anyone thought federer would stay on top forever?
No, but many thought he would stay there longer than Sampras. Turns
out that Pete still holds the record for most weeks and yrs as #1.
This annoys Fedfuckers to a frightful degree!
good for pete...it would be a shame if people totally forgot him so soon :)
Yes, Rafa leads with 5000+ points - same with Race. That's over 2 slams
and 1 M1000 to win for the 2nd best - provided Rafa wouldn't play!
RACE:
1 Rafael Nadal 11,360
2 Roger Federer 6,025
3 Novak Djokovic 5,165
Maybe rest of the tour should get double points from every tournament to
make it competitive?
The only silk cord we know anybody has is the one you seem to own,
otherwise you wouldn't mention it. I probably don't really want to know,
but, are you going to be working into your future posts other items from
your auto-erotica collection?
LNC
oh I'll happily contend that many many Fedfans said he would stay on
the top spot for literally EVER. I specifically remember some of them
saying to me back in 2006 that he would possibly NEVER lose, that he
may just go on winning and then would retire. Also I have to say Ali
(sometime Dave) still say this is the case, he didn't even lose
Wimbledon 2008 etc
lol ok that excludes me :)
I specifically remember some of them
> saying to me back in 2006 that he would possibly NEVER lose, that he
> may just go on winning and then would retire. Also I have to say Ali
> (sometime Dave) still say this is the case, he didn't even lose
> Wimbledon 2008 etc
:)
Tempes fugit....
12/10/2009
1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 11,255
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 8,945
3 Murray, Andy (GBR) 8,390
4 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 7,740
13/10/2008
1 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 7,000
2 Federer, Roger (SUI) 5,930
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 4,725
4 Murray, Andy (GBR) 2,995
08/10/2007
1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 7,355
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 5,385
3 Djokovic, Novak (SRB) 4,145
4 Davydenko, Nikolay (RUS) 3,255
09/10/2006
1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 7,370
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 4,625
3 Ljubicic, Ivan (CRO) 3,190
4 Nalbandian, David (ARG) 2,900
10/10/2005
1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,9759
2 Nadal, Rafael (ESP) 4,475
3 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,115
4 Safin, Marat (RUS) 3,015
11/10/2004
1 Federer, Roger (SUI) 6,685
2 Roddick, Andy (USA) 3,780
3 Hewitt, Lleyton (AUS) 3,065
4 Coria, Guillermo (ARG) 2,820
13/10/2003
1 Ferrero, Juan Carlos (ESP) 4,195
2 Roddick, Andy (USA) 4,165
3 Federer, Roger (SUI) 3,825
4 Agassi, Andre (USA) 3,670
14/10/2002
1 Hewitt, Lleyton (AUS) 4,465
2 Agassi, Andre (USA) 2,875
3 Haas, Tommy (USA) 2,665
4 Safin, Marat (RUS) 2,620
09/10/2000
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,739
2 Safin, Marat (RUS) 3,537
3 Kuerten, Gustavo (BRA) 3,358
4 Norman, Magnus (SWE) 3,098
10/10/1999
1 Agassi, Andre (USA) 4,339
2 Kafelnikov, Yevgeny (RUS) 3,839
3 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,544
4 Martin, Todd (USA) 2,969
12/10/1998
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,015
2 Rafter, Patrick (AUS) 3,575
3 Rios, Marcelo (CHI) 3,435
4 Moya, Carlos (ESP) 2,962
13/10/1997
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,291
2 Chang, Michael (USA) 3,385
3 Rafter, Patrick (AUS) 2,889
4 Ivanisevic, Goran (CRO) 2,581
14/10/1996
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,740
2 Chang, Michael (USA) 3,822
3 Muster, Thomas (AUT) 3,612
4 Kafelnikov, Yevgeny (RUS) 3,253
09/10/1995
1 Agassi, Andre (USA) 5,400
2 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,959
3 Muster, Thomas (AUT) 4,072
4 Becker, Boris (GER) 3,331
10/10/1994
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 4,884
2 Ivanisevic, Goran (CRO) 3,125
3 Stich, Michael (GER) 3,092
4 Bruguera, Sergi (ESP) 2,727
11/10/1993
1 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,925
2 Courier, Jim (USA) 3,759
3 Becker, Boris (GER) 2,617
4 Stich, Michael (GER) 2,598
12/10/1992
1 Courier, Jim (USA) 3,574
2 Sampras, Pete (USA) 3,366
3 Edberg, Stefan (SWE) 3,252
4 Chang, Michael (USA) 2,400
The "glory days," eh? You take somewhat too seriously the banter here
and the professional athletic careers of people who you'll never know
and who wouldn't associate with you if it meant crediting them with a
Wimbledon win. Fittingly, you can't appreciate your own deteriorated
psychological makeup.
Consider, nobody here is going to kill himself if his favorite tennis
player loses. I know that's probably impossible for you to understand
but accept it, arguendo, and maybe talk it over with a few of the other
sanitation workers and see what they say.
LNC
What if the tennis player you worship loses not only once but also
repeatedly? Someone like you may just want to end his miserable,
useless existance. I am here to help you:
I do not recommend the Turkish silk cord to someone as stupid as you
are because you do not know how to tie a knot. The Japanese hara-kiri
would not work for you either because you would just stab your toe.
I would recommend an idiot’s special just for you. Hold your breath
until you faint. It will not kill you but the people around you would
appreciate not having to put up with your foul breath.
You see, there's the problem. You think somebody's talking about
religion, about matters of faith and spirituality but almost everybody
else knows it's *tennis* that's the overarching subject. Sure, there are
a couple of bizarre headcases similar to you around here. Guys who've
only seen tennis played on TV and who conclude that there's some
mysticism to it.
You'd best save your talk of *worship* for times and places where it's
appropriate for you. Like when you're fondling your steak knife
collection or folding and putting away your mother's intimate garments;
doing those things we can all visualize your doing because the way you
talk has branded you an incurable psychotic.
Now, go ahead and say something more. Something about how there is a god
and his name is (fill in the blank with the name of some tennis player
you've heard mentioned). Talk a little more about ritual suicide and go
out of your way to racially disparage another poster regarding his
national origin. Go on...we're breathless with anticipation.
LNC
Isn't it, though? Have you ever known a guy so hung up on such aberrant
notions of honor? He's like some kind of Klingon ball boy.
LNC
What a strange person.
Is there somebody else there we can talk to?
> Isn't it, though? Have you ever known a guy so hung up on such aberrant
> notions of honor? He's like some kind of Klingon ball boy.
Have you ever noticed that he never uses contractions?
Not necessarily perverted sex but I'd rather think about sex than
suicide.
Hadn't noticed. Maybe his "'" key's broken or he has no little finger on
his right hand?
LNC
We really did not want to know what you do with your mother and your
mother's intimate garments.
There are lists and there are people who could help you with your
problems but I neither inclined nor qualified to explore your sick,
perverted mind.
Please share your experiences with your mother with your doctor, not
with this list or me. Get help pervert.