Mcenroes under rated genius

[jamesrich...@gmail.com]

Amazing to read ultra pc male 'journalists' even suggest in his prime Johnny Mac would lose to Serena Williams.

Still for me the most talented player ive ever seen with a tennis racket. Federer is supremely talented, but in a kind of textbook way. There was nothing orthodox about Macs talent, he did a lot wrong,diet and technique. But he made up for it and then some just sheer improvisational genius. Take the following backhand winner in the 1982 Wimbledon final. I cant think of any player with those rackets, balls and conditions hitting this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He81C9YjNJk

[Carey]

Yes. So were Arazi, Bahrami, and the Krishnans.

7 at 25 v 18 at 35.

YMMV

[Guypers]

LOL, Mickie had nomfh, worse than Edberg's, push push push, I have a better than, imagine what Rafa would do with that, would beat Mac 61,61,60 on grass!!!!!!!

[TennisGuy]

Just how many sock puppets does Whisper have anyway?
Anyone know?

[calim...@gmx.de]

The Deep State has yuuuge resources ...


Max

[undecided]

Totally different kind of game. Mac's was all finesse. To this day, he gives everyone a run for their money on the senior's tour. If he had better mobility he would be winning everything and he plays guys 20 years younger like Roddick, Flipper, etc. His shot selection is totally unpredictable and well placed. I don't think the modern players are used to opponents like that.

[Whisper]

Yes, I have only ever seen 1 genius in tennis - John McEnroe Jnr



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Whisper]

On 2/07/2017 1:26 AM, Carey wrote:
> Yes. So were Arazi, Bahrami, and the Krishnans.

Those guys won slams, were No.1, dominated all time greats
Borg/Connors/Lendl?

Genius has to be able to perform at the highest level no, not just look
pretty?

[Pelle Svanslös]

He's seen another. "I wish I could play like him ...".

--
“Donald Trump is the weak man’s vision of a strong man.”
-- Charles Cooke

[John Liang]

If he had better mobility, he was not gifted in that area and it is overall package that needs to be considered.

[John Liang]

On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 8:25:06 PM UTC+10, Whisper wrote:
> On 2/07/2017 1:26 AM, Carey wrote:
> > Yes. So were Arazi, Bahrami, and the Krishnans.
>
>
>
>
> Those guys won slams, were No.1, dominated all time greats
> Borg/Connors/Lendl?

Mac dominated Connors who was 8 years older than him but he did not dominate Lendl or Borg.

[soccerfan777]

Yes Whisper sneaks in BS rather confidently thinking no one will catch him. He did not dominate Connors either. He lost to Connors at both Wimbledon and US open multiple times. Their rivalry at slams was pretty even

[Gracchus]

On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 9:10:46 AM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:

> Yes Whisper sneaks in BS rather confidently thinking no one will catch him. He did not dominate Connors either. He lost to Connors at both Wimbledon and US open multiple times. Their rivalry at slams was pretty even

"Dominate" isn't accurate. McEnroe was 20-14 against Connors overall. But it was 6-3 McEnroe in slam encounters, so not an even rivalry either.

[undecided]

Dude, I am talking about better mobility NOW in his late 50s. He was fine in his 20s.

[undecided]

On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 12:10:46 PM UTC-4, soccerfan777 wrote:
> Yes Whisper sneaks in BS rather confidently thinking no one will catch him. He did not dominate Connors either. He lost to Connors at both Wimbledon and US open multiple times. Their rivalry at slams was pretty even

I personally did not care about 'domination'. His tennis was fun to watch and he did things that people had not seen before, he still does that to this day. Just watch some senior's tour and listen to the announcers (pro tennis players) gush over JMac's shotmaking.

[The Iceberg]

yes it cos he the most talented male player to ever play, on the female side reckon it's Hingis, sure Graf/Serena won far more, but they just didn't hit the ball like her.