A SCARY VIEW---

[Fednatic]

A SCARY VIEW---

I have watched over the last few years the systematic “retirement” of
most flag admirals and generals. I further understand that
replacement senior officers are asked: “If necessary, will you shoot
US Citizens?” Those that answer no are retired and those that answer
yes are promoted. Next, I have watched the mass purchase of millions
of rounds of ammo by the IRS, State department, homeland security,
etc, why? Finally, last weekend at the El Dorado casino in Reno,
there were at least a group of six homeland security people all
outfitted to look like swat team. They were inside the casino. The
flak vests said: “POLICE; Homeland Security”. This bothers me.

Watch for all guns to be confiscated in the next few years? just as
Hitler and Stalin did.

Sharing a Scary View--

As most reader know, FatherArt gets (unsolicited) updates, opinions,
screeds and even, occasionally, a few scholarly reports from an
assortment of peers, associates and colleagues from various members of
the congregation.

Understandably, not all of these are of the same standard of quality
or authenticity as it was never my intent to impose and sense of
censorship or arbitrary standards. Very often, we discuss these items
privately to make some reasonable assessment of their worthiness, but
it is generally understood that I will take the liberty to 'pass-on'
what I think may be of interest, entertainment, other points of
views..including controversies to others that I have exchanged with
via Email...

And with this preface, please consider this (unfolding) view about a
possible, rather scary political scenario. For obvious reasons, the
name of the military source is unnamed, but I will add that I have,
personally, received similar depictions from known and respected
sources...

As received--a**2

When I asked my colleague, the Army Colonel, why he thinks Obama is
doing what he has, the reply I received from this life-long soldier
and Army leader shocked me.

Paraphrasing him, this is what he told me in a nutshell.

He said, most branches of the service routinely engage in war “games”
and come up with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of
military conflict and scenario that can be imagined. One of the big
new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently
is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. And fighting in the streets.
What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the
streets of the United States? How will that urban warfare be
conducted? Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens
when the troops take an oath to protect American citizens?

He said many in the military are discussing the very real possibility
that Obama will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms. It is
being speculated that Obama will do this by declaring a state of
martial law. The easiest way to declare martial law is when there is
massive civil unrest and riots throughout the U.S. Thus, it is
believed that Obama, and his regime, will intentionally create a
situation of massive civil unrest.

Some believe he has already started to implement that strategy by
forcing Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it
and less than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Obama
Administration is not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional
Obamacare website and the additional fact that millions will be
dropped from their existing insurance policies which they already had
and liked.

The Obama Administration may not care if getting health care becomes
more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading toward
civil unrest. It is believed by some that Obamacare will only get
worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very
difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved
ones, people will get enraged.

Moreover, it is being speculated that around the same time when the
frustration levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to
3 years, there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT)
payment system.


The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain themselves
will be cut off. The overwhelming majority of the EBT recipients are
Black. The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on the
Republicans, I.e., Republicans froze government spending which
“forced” Obama to suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will
intentionally drive spending up and up uncontrolled knowing full well
that one day the Republicans will be backed into a corner and finally
vote for a freeze in spending.)

Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling everyone that
the White Republicans are racially motivated and did this to hurt the
Black community. This manufactured racial tension, combined with
growing tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to
Obamacare, will result in race wars and civil unrest. People will take
to the streets.

By the way, you should know that my colleague, the Army Colonel who is
telling me all this, is Black. He specifically commented, and
outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so
dependent and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it
would be very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by
cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month
or so. He believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of
entitlement, will then take to looting stores and rioting.

Once the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive
throughout the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over.
Elections can, and will, be postponed under martial law.

My colleague noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and
discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is
nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done
the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as
Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the identical thing.

He went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this
strategy was when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from
1972-1981 due to civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic
elections up until that time. When martial law was declared, the
Philippine constitution was suspended, its Congress dissolved, all
elections were suspended, and Marcos remained in power for years
beyond his elected term. The alleged “terrorist bombings” that
occurred in the Philippines, which lead to Marcos declaring martial
law, have always been questioned and never proven to be the acts of
actual terrorists.

He concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason
behind the purging of military generals. The older members of the
military, and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more
conservative and they believe in the Constitution?and following the
Constitution.

Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders
before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants
the military to follow along and do what the dictator says.

Due to the loss of many experienced military leaders the past few
years, the military is now being run and guided more and more by
younger, inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what
to do if martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a
growing mindset throughout the military now that every soldier needs
to keep quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to
do or you will be fired and your military career ruined.

Again, I was told this is nothing new since removing strong military
leaders in advance of declaring martial law is a historically-proven
element of a rising tyrant and dictator.

PS:

For those who might be inclined to dismiss this notion out of
hand..because of our Constitutional prohibition of using our Armed
Forces again our own people..should pause and think about how this
administration with its shared 'private agenda' assists from the
Supreme Court, DOJ, EPA, etc., at al., have been shredding it
nonstop... a**2