Kimmel takes out the trash

[Pelle Svanslös]

https://youtu.be/c6FXd2GAIaw

[calim...@gmx.de]

On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 8:35:02 PM UTC+2, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> https://youtu.be/c6FXd2GAIaw


This leftist TV guy who abuses his son as means to discredit the GOP?


Max

[bob]

i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.

bob

[Court_1]

On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:01:13 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:

> i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.

LOL! How is he an angry guy? First of all, he's got a great sense of humor and secondly, his comments here about Trump are lucid and hilarious.

[Whisper]

Conan is the best then Kimmel. Colbert is mediocre, & Fallon worst of all.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[The Iceberg]

This is the guy who started his show about how upset he was about Charlottesville.
Another Hillary fan, still upset Trump WON!

[*skriptis]

The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> This is the guy who started his show about how upset he was about Charlottesville.
> Another Hillary fan, still upset Trump WON!

Watch this?

1791L addresses the topics of Late Night Comedians and how their
routines of demonizing those whose political views differ from
theirs and hiding it behind the excuse of "it's just a joke" has
done enormous damage for the discussion of opposing views as
anyone who disagrees is portrayed as an idiot essentially.

https://youtu.be/mM7L7DNUTcw


Basically correct. It's an insane practice to have politicians
claiming they're not politician (we're just comedians) and doing
heavy propaganda but even worse ridiculing ie demonizing opposing
views, therefore demonizing everyone who thinks differently and
that way undermining democracy.


Btw that's why they couldn't hurt Trump. They are
politician-comedians so they could have taken on any politician,
but not him, who, just like them, was similarly,
comedian-politician.

And with much better humor, I might add.



--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[bob]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:32:25 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
wrote:

>On 29/09/2017 11:35 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:01:13 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>>
>>> i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.
>>
>> LOL! How is he an angry guy? First of all, he's got a great sense of humor and secondly, his comments here about Trump are lucid and hilarious.
>>
>
>Conan is the best then Kimmel. Colbert is mediocre, & Fallon worst of all.
>

i've seen kimmel's show twice now, both in past couple months. just by
chance 1st time i ever saw his show was his healthare plan rant.

the man can't sleep nights i tell you!

bob

[Court_1]

On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 6:04:18 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:32:25 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On 29/09/2017 11:35 AM, Court_1 wrote:
> >> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:01:13 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
> >>
> >>> i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.
> >>
> >> LOL! How is he an angry guy? First of all, he's got a great sense of humor and secondly, his comments here about Trump are lucid and hilarious.
> >>
> >
> >Conan is the best then Kimmel. Colbert is mediocre, & Fallon worst of all.
> >
>

> i've seen kimmel's show Thanow, both in past couple months. just by

> chance 1st time i ever saw his show was his healthare plan rant.
>
> the man can't sleep nights i tell you!
>
> bob

Can't sleep nights, lol. He's a comedian who has a talk show and he's doing his job. All of the late night talk show hosts are doing political send-ups about Trump! That's what they do!

[Pelle Svanslös]

On 30.9.2017 5:09, Court_1 wrote:
> On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 6:04:18 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:32:25 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/09/2017 11:35 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:01:13 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! How is he an angry guy? First of all, he's got a great sense of humor and secondly, his comments here about Trump are lucid and hilarious.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Conan is the best then Kimmel. Colbert is mediocre, & Fallon worst of all.
>>>
>>
>> i've seen kimmel's show Thanow, both in past couple months. just by
>> chance 1st time i ever saw his show was his healthare plan rant.
>>
>> the man can't sleep nights i tell you!
>>
>> bob
>
> Can't sleep nights, lol.

bob has rebotteled.

--
“Donald Trump is the weak man’s vision of a strong man.”
-- Charles Cooke

[bob]

i think kimmel has taken it to heart. he seems very upset.

they'll all miss trump when he's gone, what on earth will they talk
aobut.

bob

[Whisper]

I'm pro Trump but the gags don't bother me at all - they wouldn't be
doing their job if they didn't rip into him. Trump has been a boon on
many levels, including massive impact in media/comedy etc.

So far I give him an A on performance. As long as a nuclear holocaust
is averted I don't expect him to dip much.

: )

[TT]

Whisper kirjoitti 30.9.2017 klo 16:07:
> So far I give him an A on performance.  As long as a nuclear holocaust
> is averted I don't expect him to dip much.

That's what we call 'lowered expectations'.

[bob]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 23:07:22 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>

wrote:

>On 30/09/2017 10:53 PM, bob wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:09:10 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
>> <olymp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 6:04:18 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:32:25 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29/09/2017 11:35 AM, Court_1 wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:01:13 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i feel sorry for kimmel, he's one angry guy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! How is he an angry guy? First of all, he's got a great sense of humor and secondly, his comments here about Trump are lucid and hilarious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Conan is the best then Kimmel. Colbert is mediocre, & Fallon worst of all.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i've seen kimmel's show Thanow, both in past couple months. just by
>>>> chance 1st time i ever saw his show was his healthare plan rant.
>>>>
>>>> the man can't sleep nights i tell you!
>>>>
>>>> bob
>>>
>>> Can't sleep nights, lol. He's a comedian who has a talk show and he's doing his job. All of the late night talk show hosts are doing political send-ups about Trump! That's what they do!
>>
>> i think kimmel has taken it to heart. he seems very upset.
>>
>> they'll all miss trump when he's gone, what on earth will they talk
>> aobut.
>>
>> bob
>>
>
>
>I'm pro Trump but the gags don't bother me at all - they wouldn't be
>doing their job if they didn't rip into him. Trump has been a boon on
>many levels, including massive impact in media/comedy etc.

it's true that their job is to poke at politicians, but the poking at
trump has been a different thing from the normal good natured jabs at
previous presidents. the kimmel rant about health care reform wasn't
in the comedy category, he cried for 10 mins on screen and made a
heartfelt appeal to the population to not let that monster get away
with it. gone beyond normal comedy.

>So far I give him an A on performance. As long as a nuclear holocaust
>is averted I don't expect him to dip much.
>: )

i haven't graded him yet, i need to give it some time to let him get
used to the job. but as long as it's just talk, and nothing bad has
actually happened, i can't judge him harshly so far.

i knew i shoul've invested in twitter! :-)

bob

[bob]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 23:07:22 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>

how's turnbull been doing, h'es been in a few yrs now, no?

bob

[bob]

have you ever asked yourself who was asleep at the wheel while NK was
developing a hydrogen bomb? maybe GWB's fault?

bob

[Whisper]

On 30/09/2017 11:17 PM, bob wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 23:07:22 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
> wrote:

>>> i think kimmel has taken it to heart. he seems very upset.
>>>
>>> they'll all miss trump when he's gone, what on earth will they talk
>>> aobut.
>>>
>>> bob
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm pro Trump but the gags don't bother me at all - they wouldn't be
>> doing their job if they didn't rip into him. Trump has been a boon on
>> many levels, including massive impact in media/comedy etc.
>
> it's true that their job is to poke at politicians, but the poking at
> trump has been a different thing from the normal good natured jabs at
> previous presidents. the kimmel rant about health care reform wasn't
> in the comedy category, he cried for 10 mins on screen and made a
> heartfelt appeal to the population to not let that monster get away
> with it. gone beyond normal comedy.

We have an Aussie 'comedian' who does that pretty much every week.
Here's a couple examples;


Trump rant;

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=adam+hills+rant+youtube&view=detail&mid=DFFFB46ED994AB876F39DFFFB46ED994AB876F39&FORM=VIRE


Joan Rivers rant;

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Adam+Hills+Joan+Rivers+Rant&&view=detail&mid=4063CF4716923AFCCC5F4063CF4716923AFCCC5F&&FORM=VDRVRV


He's very pc & a complete bore imo, but the audience loves him for
sticking up for the 'little people'. I laugh 'at' Kimmel & Hills when
they carry on like this, not 'with' them.

[Whisper]

A huge letdown unfortunately. The guy is brilliant & a huge intellect,
but that isn't enough to be a leader. You need courage/conviction,
which he seemed to have - until he took on the top job.

Paul Keating was the best PM we've ever had imo - that guy was a real
leader, a natural.

Say what you want about Trump, but the guy is a leader & can't be pushed
around easily.

[Court_1]

On Saturday, September 30, 2017 at 9:17:19 AM UTC-4, bob wrote:

> it's true that their job is to poke at politicians, but the poking at
> trump has been a different thing from the normal good natured jabs at
> previous presidents.

That's because Trump is a psychopath and no normal individuals take him seriously except for the disenfranchised fools who thought he would come to their rescue.

> the kimmel rant about health care reform wasn't
> in the comedy category, he cried for 10 mins on screen and made a
> heartfelt appeal to the population to not let that monster get away
> with it. gone beyond normal comedy.

His baby son has a heart condition, had to have heart surgery and hence the healthcare speech. STFU you heartless buffoon! Have some empathy for his situation.

> but as long as it's just talk, and nothing bad has
> actually happened, i can't judge him harshly so far.

That's how you're rationalizing Trump's behavior now? You're a joke.

[TennisGuy]

+1

[Pelle Svanslös]

Can't lower them lower.

[bob]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:13:53 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
<olymp...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, September 30, 2017 at 9:17:19 AM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>
>> it's true that their job is to poke at politicians, but the poking at
>> trump has been a different thing from the normal good natured jabs at
>> previous presidents.
>
>That's because Trump is a psychopath and no normal individuals take him seriously except for the disenfranchised fools who thought he would come to their rescue.

you're on record saying trump's policies may be good for you and your
family. i never once said trump would do anything good for me.

i thought he might do some harm to the swamp, and it might have a good
effect on the country as a whole. at the very least he ran the bushes
and clintons out of washington with their tails between their legs.
that was worth admission.

>> the kimmel rant about health care reform wasn't
>> in the comedy category, he cried for 10 mins on screen and made a
>> heartfelt appeal to the population to not let that monster get away
>> with it. gone beyond normal comedy.
>
>His baby son has a heart condition, had to have heart surgery and hence the healthcare speech. STFU you heartless buffoon! Have some empathy for his situation.

i have empahty for his little baby, not kimmel. when kimmel, a
multimillionaire with the very best L.A. doctors at his disposal had a
need for a pediatric heart doctor, he took that opportunity to blast
trump about healthcare? why not before then?

it's TV of the lowest order. classless.

>> but as long as it's just talk, and nothing bad has
>> actually happened, i can't judge him harshly so far.
>
>That's how you're rationalizing Trump's behavior now? You're a joke.

bless your heart.

bob

[Court_1]

On Saturday, September 30, 2017 at 8:52:42 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:

> you're on record saying trump's policies may be good for you and your
> family.

I said I agreed with some of his stances such as his views about NAFTA but too bad he's such a revolting character.

> i never once said trump would do anything good for me.

That's a lie. You did say a few times that Trump may benefit you financially. Don't make me go back in the archives and find those posts.

> i thought he might do some harm to the swamp, and it might have a good
> effect on the country as a whole. at the very least he ran the bushes
> and clintons out of washington with their tails between their legs.
> that was worth admission.

He ran the Clintons out but at what cost? What are HIS approval ratings? The lowest ever for any president?

> i have empahty for his little baby, not kimmel. when kimmel, a
> multimillionaire with the very best L.A. doctors at his disposal had a
> need for a pediatric heart doctor, he took that opportunity to blast
> trump about healthcare? why not before then?

Oh my God, you really are a clueless soul. Why would he make a heartfelt speech about healthcare unless he was affected by it personally which was the case when he found out his son had a heart condition? You continually make insensitive comments about parenting and children just because you probably shoot blanks? You honestly don't understand how distraught he was about his son's condition and his want for all people(rich and poor)to have proper and fair healthcare if they were in the same situation he found himself with his son?

> it's TV of the lowest order. classless.
>
> >> but as long as it's just talk, and nothing bad has
> >> actually happened, i can't judge him harshly so far.
> >
> >That's how you're rationalizing Trump's behavior now? You're a joke.

> bless your heart.

That's your reply? It's true that you're trying very hard to find something nice to say about Trump and so the best you can do is say, "I'm not going to judge him too harshly so far." Don't you hear how ridiculous that sounds?

[bob]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 20:27:36 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
<olymp...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, September 30, 2017 at 8:52:42 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
>
>> you're on record saying trump's policies may be good for you and your
>> family.
>
>I said I agreed with some of his stances such as his views about NAFTA but too bad he's such a revolting character.

no doubt he's abrasive with an irritating personality. that's what
reality show hosts do.

>> i never once said trump would do anything good for me.
>
>That's a lie. You did say a few times that Trump may benefit you financially. Don't make me go back in the archives and find those posts.

? don't think so. also, how bout bernie? would he benefit my personal
finances? hah. but i don't mind.

the stock market has surged mightily, which has benefitted me so far.
but it can crash in 3 months just as easily. the stock market had a
very nice runup form 09-2016 under obama also. no complaints there.

>> i thought he might do some harm to the swamp, and it might have a good
>> effect on the country as a whole. at the very least he ran the bushes
>> and clintons out of washington with their tails between their legs.
>> that was worth admission.
>
>He ran the Clintons out but at what cost?

unless we have a nuclear war, it was worth the cost.

> What are HIS approval ratings? The lowest ever for any president?

substantially higher than mitch mcconnel's.

>> i have empahty for his little baby, not kimmel. when kimmel, a
>> multimillionaire with the very best L.A. doctors at his disposal had a
>> need for a pediatric heart doctor, he took that opportunity to blast
>> trump about healthcare? why not before then?
>
>Oh my God, you really are a clueless soul. Why would he make a heartfelt speech about healthcare unless he was affected by it personally which was the case when he found out his son had a heart condition?

it reminds me of cindy sheehan, iraq war protester. she never said a
word til her son was killed. if you really hated that war, you should
say so from day 1 - not just after you're affected personally IMO. not
that i don't have empathy for the person, or agree with the person,
but it loses weight when they wait for a personal tragedy to care.

> You continually make insensitive comments about parenting and children just because you probably shoot blanks? You honestly don't understand how distraught he was about his son's condition and his want for all people(rich and poor)to have proper and fair healthcare if they were in the same situation he found himself with his son?

i never wanted children, and i certainly wish all my life i'd "shoot
blanks" and not need to worry about an "accident" happening.

but that's irrelevant to your claim. i'm not insensitive to kimmel's
baby, i have tremendous empathy for the baby. i'm very happy the baby
got treatment. but NOT for kimmel given his method. and i don't know
of a single hospital in this country that wouldn't treat an infant
with a medical condition. not to mention nobody can be thrown out of
an emergency room, paying or not.

many of my friends have children and some are great parents, some not
so much. some of their kids are wonderful, some not so much. it's
always the ones who think the world revolves around their "little
johnny" that fall into the "not so much" category. speaking of that,
how old are your boys? :-)

>> it's TV of the lowest order. classless.
>>
>> >> but as long as it's just talk, and nothing bad has
>> >> actually happened, i can't judge him harshly so far.
>> >
>> >That's how you're rationalizing Trump's behavior now? You're a joke.
>
>> bless your heart.
>
>That's your reply? It's true that you're trying very hard to find something nice to say about Trump and so the best you can do is say, "I'm not going to judge him too harshly so far." Don't you hear how ridiculous that sounds?

bob