Quite not.
Definetly not.
Trying to figure out how many slams would have won had Nadal not
played the game is somewhat crazy. We are considering something like
22 at the very least.
Can't consider any player (not matter how much/low you like his game/
caracter) capable of preventing another from so many slams as a
footnote.
I hardly can stand Connors, yet he wasn't a footnote on Mac's carrer,
nor on Ashes's nor on Borg.
I truly like Becker, yet slam-wise, I would have liked Boris a lot
more had he lost a bit more to Stefan!
I hope you got the picture I'm trying to draw.