It is not just Federer losing...
Fan
Did Rogi pull a fast one? Did he lose on purpose? Who made money on
this match?
Patrick Kehoe
++ Mirka??? :)))))))))))))))))
P
Superdave
The Russians of course !
Manco
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:34:05 -0700 (PDT), Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >He lost to Gulbis who tried his "best" to hand the match to Federer.
> >Did Rogi pull a fast one? Did he lose on purpose? Who made money on
> >this match?
>
> The Russians of course !
No it was the gays. Had to be the gays.
ca1houn
Fed lose I’m find with it, clay is not his best surface. I know he
had done wonder on the surface which shows just how great of a champ
he really is. There nothing too worry about Wimbledon is in the bag.
Nadal is going to win the French, which is ok because Nadal is willing
to give his right nut for the title. Nadal losing three slams title
to his "rival” kills him so he’s more focus on turn his shitty start
around. Remember 11 plus month with no win against a top ten player
can drive anybody crazy
Whisper
Your writing style is remarkable.
Fan
Clay may not be Federer’s best surface but he broke Gulbis’ serve
twice in the first set. He also had Gulbis on the ropes in the third
set. Why did he let him win?
Superdave
Can't be. Gays are all "losers".
john
"Fan" <Turnag...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1f78da98-0632-4ec0...@y30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
john
"Fan" <Turnag...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1f78da98-0632-4ec0...@y30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Did you actually watch the match to come up with the above comment. Federer
was
only ahead in the first game of the set and thereafter he was always behind
Gulbis.
How did he have Gulbis on the rope if he was the one who kept saving match
points?
TT
What we saw was that Federer still has huge aura, Gulbis almost pissed
his pants out there when serving for the match.
Unfortunately Roger pissed his pants more. I guess he wasn't enjoying
the challenge as much as vari claimed on a trip inside fed's head.
--
"Ave Rafa, morituri te salutant!"
Superdave
the saddest thing for me is that rome is now over. i probably won't watch any
more matches except maybe the final if rafa isn't there.
TT
What you're missing is probably the greatest mastery of tennis on any
surface ever...so no biggie.
TT
Also note that Rafa is going for ALL TIME record of 5 Rome titles...he
already has the record(4) but is now going after EVERT...that's how
exceptional his domination is.
Superdave
It's rather easy to dominate when you CHEAT !
Superdave
Sorry. I don;t consider CHEATING as mastery of anything.
TT
With these kind of results he must be exceptionally great at time
wasting between serves...surely that sort of mastery is worth admiration...
RzR
"TT" <n...@email.org> wrote in message
news:dqVBn.2041$if1....@uutiset.elisa.fi...
>
> What you're missing is probably the greatest mastery of tennis on any
> surface ever...
OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLL
i have to make sure next time i dont drink or eat while reading crap like
this
RzR
its easy to dominate one surface when you throw away everything inbetween
under excuse of injury
Whisper
>
> It's rather easy to dominate when you CHEAT !
Well I wouldn't call it 'cheating' exactly. Fed still deserves his
titles because it's not his fault he's playing in a softcock era. What
can he do, quit in disgust?
TT
Are you the worst poster of rst?
maybe you should check Nadal's record on clay...
Fan
attention snd he still won. Hard to figure unless…
You are right about Nadal.
RzR
> RzR wrote:
>>
>> "TT" <n...@email.org> wrote in message
>> news:dqVBn.2041$if1....@uutiset.elisa.fi...
>>
>>>
>>> What you're missing is probably the greatest mastery of tennis on any
>>> surface ever...
>>
>> OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLL
>>
>> i have to make sure next time i dont drink or eat while reading crap like
>> this
>
>
> Are you the worst poster of rst?
>
doubt it
> maybe you should check Nadal's record on clay...
>
who gives a fuck...you say mastery, i say nadals game is boring and
ugly...it relies on moonballing...if you want mastery, watch federer...even
when he loses his game tops nadals by far...
john
"Whisper" <beav...@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:Ruednd0k6dVYsUXW...@westnet.com.au...
Talking about soft cock era any era that has player like Kafelnikov or Moya
as No.1
deserve to be called soft cock era.
ca1houn
thank you I'm glad you like it
ca1houn
beat the fuck out off me
ca1houn
shit i know i can care less about this tourney now
Superdave
just goes to show how much people love Fed and could care less about Rafa.
ca1houn
>
> - Show quoted text -
TT you’re fucking disgusting, watching a dude with OCD mastering ass
picking is just grotesque. I have no desire to watch a guy place
he’s water bottle together and cry when a ball kid knock them over.
The Rome master series start too early for me and with no real champ
present I can’t see why anybody would want to watch that bullshit. I
would have been piss if I had ticket. Lucky for me Federer won the
Indians wells tourney when I had passes for all the days. Punks ass
Agassi had to withdraw which suck, but he did sign autography
Whisper
You're joking? Those guys were amazing talents & would run rings around
Blake/Ljubo/Bargitis.
Whisper
Just shows how many Fedfuckers there are. You guys are a blight on the
game & have no real interest in the game of tennis. The sooner you
leave rst the better. Just fuck off already.
Superdave
It's the hypocrites like you that are the blight.
The sooner you realize that Fed is the GOAT and NOT Pete and NOT Rafa and shut
your fucking trap and gain some humility the better.
TT
Yes
Fan
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:05:50 +1000, Whisper <beave...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >On 4/29/2010 7:34 PM, Superdave wrote:
>
> >>> On Apr 28, 4:48 am, Superdave<the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:52 +0300, TT<n...@email.org> wrote:
> >>>>> Fan wrote:
> >>>>>> He lost to Gulbis who tried his "best" to hand the match to Federer.
> >>>>>> Did Rogi pull a fast one? Did he lose on purpose? Who made money on
> >>>>>> this match?
>
> >>>>> What we saw was that Federer still has huge aura, Gulbis almost pissed
> >>>>> his pants out there when serving for the match.
>
> >>>>> Unfortunately Roger pissed his pants more. I guess he wasn't enjoying
> >>>>> the challenge as much as vari claimed on a trip inside fed's head.
>
> >>>> the saddest thing for me is that rome is now over. i probably won't watch any
> >>>> more matches except maybe the final if rafa isn't there.
>
> >>> shit i know i can care less about this tourney now
>
> >> just goes to show how much people love Fed and could care less about Rafa.
>
> >Just shows how many Fedfuckers there are. You guys are a blight on the
> >game & have no real interest in the game of tennis. The sooner you
> >leave rst the better. Just fuck off already.
>
> It's the hypocrites like you that are the blight.
>
> The sooner you realize that Fed is the GOAT and NOT Pete and NOT Rafa and shut
I think you are all nuts. For me, the tournament loses its appeal when
Rafa is not playing but I can see that others feel the same way about
Rogi. That is how it should be.
There are lists specifically for Rafa and Rogi fans where all you read
is how great your favorite player is. There is also ATP home page
where you can get all the information. The reason we all post here is
that we like controversy. The right amount of controversy is nice but
when fans go nuts, it is counterproductive.
I think that Rogi lost that match because he did not want to wear
himself out before the French. It is a smart move but not very honest
because he could have skipped it and take some fines but instead he
entered and did not give his best.
Superdave
>On Apr 29, 12:16锟絧m, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:05:50 +1000, Whisper <beave...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> >On 4/29/2010 7:34 PM, Superdave wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:24:48 -0700 (PDT), ca1houn<vageta95...@yahoo.com> 锟絯rote:
>>
>> >>> On Apr 28, 4:48 am, Superdave<the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> 锟絯rote:
>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:52 +0300, TT<n...@email.org> 锟絯rote:
>> >>>>> Fan wrote:
>> >>>>>> He lost to Gulbis who tried his "best" to hand the match to Federer.
>> >>>>>> Did Rogi pull a fast one? Did he lose on purpose? Who made money on
>> >>>>>> this match?
>>
>> >>>>> What we saw was that Federer still has huge aura, Gulbis almost pissed
>> >>>>> his pants out there when serving for the match.
>>
>> >>>>> Unfortunately Roger pissed his pants more. I guess he wasn't enjoying
>> >>>>> the challenge as much as vari claimed on a trip inside fed's head.
>>
>> >>>> the saddest thing for me is that rome is now over. i probably won't watch any
>> >>>> more matches except maybe the final if rafa isn't there.
>>
>> >>> shit i know i can care less about this tourney now
>>
>> >> just goes to show how much people love Fed and could care less about Rafa.
>>
>> >Just shows how many Fedfuckers there are. 锟結ou guys are a blight on the
>> >game & have no real interest in the game of tennis. 锟絋he sooner you
>> >leave rst the better. 锟絁ust fuck off already.
>>
>> It's the hypocrites like you that are the blight.
>>
>> The sooner you realize that Fed is the GOAT and NOT Pete and NOT Rafa and shut
>> your fucking trap and gain some humility the better.-
>
>I think you are all nuts. For me, the tournament loses its appeal when
>Rafa is not playing but I can see that others feel the same way about
>Rogi. That is how it should be.
>There are lists specifically for Rafa and Rogi fans where all you read
>is how great your favorite player is. There is also ATP home page
>where you can get all the information. The reason we all post here is
>that we like controversy. The right amount of controversy is nice but
>when fans go nuts, it is counterproductive.
>I think that Rogi lost that match because he did not want to wear
>himself out before the French. It is a smart move but not very honest
>because he could have skipped it and take some fines but instead he
>entered and did not give his best.
maybe, but then he did not know he would face a gulbis in r1 either
in his FIRST clay match of the season.
Rodjk #613
The three of them reached *one* slam final. Blake reached 3 QFs and
Ljubicic reached a semi at the FO.
You already know this.
I mentioned earlier that you were at least trying to alter your
trolling, but I guess you are reverting back to your old, tired form.
Rodjk #613
Vari L. Cinicke
> On Apr 29, 5:03 am, Whisper<beave...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> On 4/29/2010 12:17 AM, john wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Whisper"<beave...@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:Ruednd0k6dVYsUXW...@westnet.com.au...
>>>> On 4/28/2010 10:12 PM, Superdave wrote:
>>
>>>>> It's rather easy to dominate when you CHEAT !
>>
>>>> Well I wouldn't call it 'cheating' exactly. Fed still deserves his titles
>>>> because it's not his fault he's playing in a softcock era. What can he
>>>> do, quit in disgust?
>>
>>> Talking about soft cock era any era that has player like Kafelnikov or Moya
>>> as No.1
>>> deserve to be called soft cock era.
>>
>> Blake/Ljubo/Bargitis.
>
> The three of them reached *one* slam final. Blake reached 3 QFs and
> Ljubicic reached a semi at the FO.
>
> You already know this.
>
> I mentioned earlier that you were at least trying to alter your
> trolling, but I guess you are reverting back to your old, tired form.
>
> Rodjk #613
Has Whisper been trying to teat Sampras down, he would have pointed out
that Moya reached #1 in the Sampras era by winning zero, nada, zip
tournaments. It was so hard to win tournaments back then but the #1 rank
was there for the taking! :)
--
Cheers,
vc
john
You got to be joking to consider them amazing talent. Hewitt was the person
that you described
as having a soft cock game yet he was beating Kafelnikov like a drum even as
a teenager. The
amazingly talented Mr Kafelnikov won 4 games against Hewitt in their 2001
USO semi while he
was No.4 in the world and wasn't too old or too tired at the time.
>
>
Whisper
>>> Moya
>>> as No.1
>>> deserve to be called soft cock era.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blake/Ljubo/Bargitis.
>
> You got to be joking to consider them amazing talent. Hewitt was the person
> that you described
> as having a soft cock game yet he was beating Kafelnikov like a drum even as
> a teenager. The
> amazingly talented Mr Kafelnikov won 4 games against Hewitt in their 2001
> USO semi while he
> was No.4 in the world and wasn't too old or too tired at the time.
>>
Please - Sampras at his absolute rock bottom beat Hewitt in straight
sets in a slam semifinal.
Vari L. Cinicke
Absolute rock bottom? Let us see. He won Wimbledon that year and reached
the final of the US Open and reached #1 again two days after beating
Hewitt. You are so used to your lies that you probably don't even know
that you are lying.
In any case, Hewitt was so upset that the next time they met in a slam
he crushed Sampras. I forget the score but there was some bakery
involvement.
--
Cheers,
vc
TennisGuy
Hey Ca1houn. What is your native language?
PLEASE don't say English!
ca1houn
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ok i want say English or that i got a degree in english well lol jusy
kidding i'm in Business Marketing
Javier González Nicolini
It's obvious ca1houn's 1st language is "ca1hounese".
Rodjk #613
> On 4/29/2010 3:56 PM, Whisper wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4/29/2010 11:42 PM, john wrote:
> >>>> Talking about soft cock era any era that has player like Kafelnikov or
> >>>> Moya
> >>>> as No.1
> >>>> deserve to be called soft cock era.
>
> >>> You're joking? Those guys were amazing talents& would run rings around
> >>> Blake/Ljubo/Bargitis.
>
> >> You got to be joking to consider them amazing talent. Hewitt was the
> >> person
> >> that you described
> >> as having a soft cock game yet he was beating Kafelnikov like a drum
> >> even as
> >> a teenager. The
> >> amazingly talented Mr Kafelnikov won 4 games against Hewitt in their 2001
> >> USO semi while he
> >> was No.4 in the world and wasn't too old or too tired at the time.
>
> > Please - Sampras at his absolute rock bottom beat Hewitt in straight
> > sets in a slam semifinal.
>
> Absolute rock bottom? Let us see. He won Wimbledon that year and reached
> the final of the US Open and reached #1 again two days after beating
> Hewitt. You are so used to your lies that you probably don't even know
> that you are lying.
He is trolling, mostly. The truth is, Whisper does not know enough
about tennis to be lying about it. It is pretty obvious, he has
dropped enough hints for us to know that he really does not know the
game.
That's why I advocate just ignoring him, and try to do so as much as
possible.
Its when his nonsense makes Pete look bad that I get annoyed.
> In any case, Hewitt was so upset that the next time they met in a slam
> he crushed Sampras. I forget the score but there was some bakery
> involvement.
Like when his nonsense leads to the above sort of comment...
Rodjk #613
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> vc
Vari L. Cinicke
I doubt that any one on rst is unaware of Whisper's Sampras worship or
his Sampras memes one of which is Sampras's revenge taking.
That is all. No reason to get bent out of shape. I don't at all take
clowns like Whisper seriously.
Sampras is safe in the tennis pantheon.
--
Cheers,
vc
TennisGuy
> > Hey Ca1houn. What is your native language?
> > PLEASE don't say English!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Ok i want say English or that i got a degree in english well lol jusy
> kidding i'm in Business Marketing
Let me try this another way.
What country were you born in?
Rodjk #613
I know that, and I realize my comment may come across as a knock on
you...
it was not meant that way.
Whisper just makes such nonsensical comments that it is only to be
expected that they are turned around and used against Pete...
It isn't you, or any of the guys who do that that annoy me. It is that
Whisper continues to use such silliness that it makes me think he is
really *trying* to make Pete look bad. Though, I have to say, it is
more likely that he really knows as little about tennis and logic as
he appears to...
>
> Sampras is safe in the tennis pantheon.
Yes.
ca1houn
>
> - Show quoted text -
Damn whisper if I didn't know any better I would think you hated
Federer. However, that can be truth because I read on numerous
occasions had you were a Federer fan. Shit with fans like you who need
hater; never seen a fan that hate their icon / person they supposedly
root for spit so much detestation.
ca1houn
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
LOL I'm loving it is that copyrighted, i might need to barrow that
ca1houn
Country: America
State: California
County: Los Angeles
City: Inglewood
Now you got the 411, nees Social as well
ca1houn
English is my first language. Damn some please such "L7" can take a
joke, anuways i answer it in my first post
Patrick Kehoe
> On 4/29/2010 3:56 PM, Whisper wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 4/29/2010 11:42 PM, john wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
++ I guess vc, some people just don't let history or what really
happened distract them from making a statement/comment... :)))
P
Patrick Kehoe
>
> - Show quoted text -
++ Exactly...
P
Superdave
>On Apr 30, 6:34�am, Javier Gonz�lez Nicolini <jagon...@gmail.com>
if you nedd my wheel borrow to barrow that you can.
ca1houn
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT), ca1houn <vageta95...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 30, 6:34 am, Javier González Nicolini <jagon...@gmail.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thank Dave Federer fan have to stick together lol there so few of us,
just kidding everybody know that real tennis fan will always prefer
Roger