On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 12:58:15 PM UTC+2, StephenJ wrote:
> On 6/8/2017 7:44 PM, bob wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT),
calim...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 6:21:18 AM UTC+2, StephenJ wrote:
> >>> On 6/7/2017 10:36 PM, Court_1 wrote:
> >>>> On Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 5:18:25 PM UTC-4, DavidW wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/06/2017 6:09 AM, stephenJ wrote:
> >>>>>> Bye Bye Steffi !!!! HAhahahaha !!! :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nope. Steffi is the GOAT.
> >>>>
> >>>> As somebody who dislikes Graf and Williams equally, no Graf is not the GOAT any longer. Williams is.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Don't argue with these dumb Grafans, they are just bitter that Steffi
> >>> was blown past. Pointless.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not bitter but slightly amused.
> >> In which regard has Williams blown past Graf? Number of slams?
> >> Well, that department wasn't important
> >
> > it sure was important to you when federer got to 15.
>
>
> What's funny is that Max is very wrong about the import of slam numbers.
> Ever since she surpassed Evert and MN at 18 slams, I've always said that
> *if* you ignored the Seles stabbing and went just on court
> accomplishments, Graf was clearly the Open Era GOAT. That was based on
> slams won, and that was clearly the consensus among everyone, really**.
> So to act like somehow the goalposts have been changed against Steffi is
> absurd.
>
> ** There were some, including Graf herself, that said MN was #1, but
> that was arrived at by adding in MN's doubles accomplishments. ....
No. What people like you don't understand is that it is not only about numbers, especially not only about slams won.
It is about the play, the style, Golden Grand Slams, the competition, number of memorable matches, character, role model qualification, grace, social engagement, the opposition, numbers of all-time greats playing at the same time, fan base, off-court behaviour, intelligence, comparable success in a shorter time, sexiness, dignity and a lot more.