Gore and Obama set to sell their beachfront mansions because NOW the climate catastrophe is near!

[calim...@gmx.de]

Just joking ...

Of course they won't do that.


Max

[joh]

Op zondag 4 juni 2017 00:09:36 UTC+2 schreef calim...@gmx.de:
> Just joking ...
>
you must be German

[Brian W Lawrence]

On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:

> Just joking ...
>
> Of course they won't do that.

In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
coast and about 55 metres ASL.

AFAIK the Obama's don't own a beachfront mansion. They have spent seven
summers on Martha's Vineyard, generally renting the same property which
isn't on the beach either.




---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Pelle Svanslös]

On 4.6.2017 12:43, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>
>> Just joking ...
>>
>> Of course they won't do that.
>
> In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
> Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
> coast and about 55 metres ASL.
>
> AFAIK the Obama's don't own a beachfront mansion. They have spent seven
> summers on Martha's Vineyard, generally renting the same property which
> isn't on the beach either.

Calimero? Lol.

--
“Donald Trump is the weak man’s vision of a strong man.”
-- Charles Cooke

[Gerrit Rijtoopje]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 13:09:27 +0300, Pelle Svanslös <pe...@svans.com>
wrote:

>On 4.6.2017 12:43, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> Just joking ...
>>>
>>> Of course they won't do that.
>>
>> In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
>> Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
>> coast and about 55 metres ASL.
>>
>> AFAIK the Obama's don't own a beachfront mansion. They have spent seven
>> summers on Martha's Vineyard, generally renting the same property which
>> isn't on the beach either.
>
>Calimero? Lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ovzN-0hJgI

[calim...@gmx.de]

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 11:43:24 AM UTC+2, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Just joking ...
> >
> > Of course they won't do that.
>
> In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
> Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
> coast and about 55 metres ASL.

On photos it looks like less than 10 metres. Dangerous, dangerous, Al ...

>
> AFAIK the Obama's don't own a beachfront mansion. They have spent seven
> summers on Martha's Vineyard, generally renting the same property which
> isn't on the beach either.

Obama had a strawman - a "friend" - buy the "Magnum P.I." mansion for him. Would have been too embarassing for him otherwise ...


Max

[Gracchus]

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 8:30:21 AM UTC-7, calim...@gmx.de wrote:

> Obama had a strawman - a "friend" - buy the "Magnum P.I." mansion for him. Would have been too embarassing for him otherwise ...

That's more of a surrogate than a strawman.

[calim...@gmx.de]

What difference does it make, at this point?


Max

[stephenJ]

> On 6/3/2017 5:09 PM, calim...@gmx.de wrote:

> Just joking ...

You're on a roll, keep 'em coming. 😁

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[calim...@gmx.de]

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 6:07:33 PM UTC+2, StephenJ wrote:
> > On 6/3/2017 5:09 PM, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Just joking ...
>
> You're on a roll, keep 'em coming. 😁
>

Even corrupt bankers hate those liberal millionaire hypocrites.


Max

[The Iceberg]

This was before he started doing talks for Wall St! :)

[The Iceberg]

Lol Al Gore says it's a "complex relationship" :)

[bob]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT), calim...@gmx.de wrote:

>On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 11:43:24 AM UTC+2, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>> > Just joking ...
>> >
>> > Of course they won't do that.
>>
>> In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
>> Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
>> coast and about 55 metres ASL.
>
>
>On photos it looks like less than 10 metres. Dangerous, dangerous, Al ...

my cousin lives in santa barbara, been through montecito a few times.
no worries about floods, even beachfront there is up cliffs.

>> AFAIK the Obama's don't own a beachfront mansion. They have spent seven
>> summers on Martha's Vineyard, generally renting the same property which
>> isn't on the beach either.
>
>
>Obama had a strawman - a "friend" - buy the "Magnum P.I." mansion for him. Would have been too embarassing for him otherwise ...

obama just bought an $8mil home in DC, guess he plans to buck
tradition and stick around to criticize the winning administration.
don't recall any other recent presidents doing that.

like him less every day.

bob

[soccerfan777]

Calamari, are you an illiterate buffoon? You think all the scientists in the world are paid liberals?

[TT]

bob kirjoitti 4.6.2017 klo 20:50:
> obama just bought an $8mil home in DC, guess he plans to buck
> tradition and stick around to criticize the winning administration.
> don't recall any other recent presidents doing that.

He could live in China and criticize the administration.

[bob]

not really. he likes to stay around town to keep his face relevant,
talk to the local press, etc. really bad form. but i expected it of
him.

bob

[calim...@gmx.de]

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 7:53:37 PM UTC+2, soccerfan777 wrote:
> Calamari, are you an illiterate buffoon? You think all the scientists in the world are paid liberals?

No, since the scientist of the world are very divided about how much mankind contributes to climate change, you idiot.

Max

[Pelle Svanslös]

Calimero? Lol!

[bob]

divided how? 95-5%?

but personally, i'm divided on it. people think they know a lot more
than they do. hawking said we need to inhabit another planet within
100 yrs to survive.

bob

[TT]

This coming from a Trump supporter, such irony!

[calim...@gmx.de]

On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 8:34:04 PM UTC+2, bob wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 11:28:22 -0700 (PDT), calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 7:53:37 PM UTC+2, soccerfan777 wrote:
> >> Calamari, are you an illiterate buffoon? You think all the scientists in the world are paid liberals?
> >
> >
> >No, since the scientist of the world are very divided about how much mankind contributes to climate change, you idiot.
>
> divided how? 95-5%?
>
>

There is not even a majority among climate scientists who say that mankind is the MAIN contributor to climate change.

BTW, what happened to all those doomsday forecasts Al Gore and Prince Charles made in the last 20 years ... ?


Max

[calim...@gmx.de]

Why is this an irony?

Trump is the master of fake news!


Max

[bob]

did reagan (CA), clinton (NY) or bush I and II (TX) stick around DC
after their terms? nope, only obama. really bad form.

bob

[bob]

i'm under the impression that virtually all climate scientists except
the ones employed by the oil industry say humans are the main cause.

have i been "CNN'd"????

bob

[bob]

what is fake about obama sticking around buying a home in DC being bad
form? did he not buy the house after all?

bob

[Brian W Lawrence]

On 04/06/2017 16:30, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
> On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 11:43:24 AM UTC+2, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 23:09, calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> Just joking ...
>>>
>>> Of course they won't do that.
>>
>> In Gore's case his 'beachfront mansion' is in Montecito near Santa
>> Barbara. Montecito isn't on the beach, it's a good distance from the
>> coast and about 55 metres ASL.
>
>
> On photos it looks like less than 10 metres. Dangerous, dangerous, Al ...

It's an 'ocean-view' villa in the Montecito hills. Dunno what pictures
you have seen.

[calim...@gmx.de]

Yes, you have been duped.

Remember this alleged "97 % of all scientists consensus"?


Max

[*skriptis]

bob <b...@nospam.net> Wrote in message:

How about going to Germany recently, meeting with Merkel and
giving speeches in Berlin, all that before those NATO and G7
meetings to steal the spotlight?

Embarassing. A clown.
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[TT]

calim...@gmx.de kirjoitti 4.6.2017 klo 22:24:
> Remember this alleged "97 % of all scientists consensus"?

100% of serious scientists most likely.

[calim...@gmx.de]

You are really a true believer.
Too lazy to check out this alleged study which came up with the 97-% claim. That's the point - people who lie this blatantly most probably have something to hide. And/or profit from it.

The climate change cult is probably the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of mankind.


Max

[bob]

he's revealing a lack of class, something i thought he'd keep well
hidden behind the slick speeches.

bob

[bob]

just cause people may profit from the CO2 reduction technologies
doesn't mean they're necessarily wrong though.

used to be, back in the day, it was said that 95% of all scientists
think global warming is caused by people burning excess CO2. CO2 in
core samples showed direct relations between rises in temps and rises
in CO2. in came the CO2 crowd, i.e. how to lower this before the temp
rises beyond conrol to a runaway condition - glaciers melt, they quit
reflecting sunlight, they turn to water which absorbs sunlight, and on
and on.

i'm not sure i believe people's contribution is the main problem.

bob

[stephenJ]

Agreed, really poor form.


---

[heyg...@gmail.com]

He has a daughter in school who wants to stay in DC. How horrible! Lol

Presidents have to buy huge houses--half is taken up by secret service. Bush bought two houses side by side...

[jdeluise]

On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 18:15:56 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> Agreed, really poor form.

I doubt his physical presence means much of anything. At any rate, do
you want and expect Trump to fade into the wordwork like a good little ex-
president when he's out of office? No more tweeting, etc?

[Brian W Lawrence]

And I agree with you. It's one factor, but not necessarily the most
significant one.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Brian W Lawrence]

Surely Obama, or any US citizen, can live anywhere they choose? It's not
like he has a 'home state' to return too - he has ties to Hawaii and
Illinois, but neither has a particular draw for him.

[stephenJ]

> On 6/4/2017 8:37 PM, heyg...@gmail.com wrote:
> He has a daughter in school who wants to stay in DC.

I wonder if it's a public school of the kind he thinks other Americans
should attend?

[stephenJ]

On 6/5/2017 3:45 AM, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 20:00, bob wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT), calim...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 8:36:40 PM UTC+2, TT wrote:
>>>> bob kirjoitti 4.6.2017 klo 21:25:
>>>>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:18:51 +0300, TT <as...@dprk.kp> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> bob kirjoitti 4.6.2017 klo 20:50:
>>>>>>> obama just bought an $8mil home in DC, guess he plans to buck
>>>>>>> tradition and stick around to criticize the winning administration.
>>>>>>> don't recall any other recent presidents doing that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He could live in China and criticize the administration.
>>>>>
>>>>> not really. he likes to stay around town to keep his face relevant,
>>>>> talk to the local press, etc. really bad form. but i expected it of
>>>>> him.
>>>>>
>>>>> bob
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This coming from a Trump supporter, such irony!
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is this an irony? Trump is the master of fake news!
>>
>> what is fake about obama sticking around buying a home in DC being bad
>> form? did he not buy the house after all?
>
> Surely Obama, or any US citizen, can live anywhere they choose?

It's not a question of what Obama has the right to do, it's what he
should do. In the USA, there's a bi-partisan tradition of the old
President "going away" politically once his term of office is over, of
staying out of the limelight, rarely commenting about the job his
successor is doing, or even on public events more generally.

And typically, part of that is retreating far away from the center of
power, Washington.




---

[jdeluise]

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:17:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> It's not a question of what Obama has the right to do, it's what he
> should do. In the USA, there's a bi-partisan tradition of the old
> President "going away" politically once his term of office is over, of
> staying out of the limelight, rarely commenting about the job his
> successor is doing, or even on public events more generally.

Trump is going to be THE WORST when it comes to that, I suspect, but
you'll have no problem with it I'm sure...

[*skriptis]

jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

You'll blame Trump if he doesn't keep a low profile even though it
was Obama, before him, who made a precedent?

Seriously?

[jdeluise]

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 22:00:08 +0200, *skriptis wrote:

> You'll blame Trump if he doesn't keep a low profile even though it
> was Obama, before him, who made a precedent?
>
> Seriously?

Actually I don't have any problem with him, Obama, Bushes, Bill
commenting or being politically active after their terms are up. It was
Stephen and yourself that have a problem with it (when it's Obama). My
point was that if Trump does it (more like *when* he does it) I doubt
you'll be concerned about it. Man, Obama and Hillary really get
conservatives shaking in their boots... bizarre.

[calim...@gmx.de]

Which GOP president (including Lincoln) didn't make you crazy DemocRats NOT shake in your boots?


Max

[heyg...@gmail.com]

Poppy Bush

[calim...@gmx.de]

Because he won his war decisively?
Or because he got beaten after the first term?


Max

[Guypers]

Bush 41 belongs to the greates generation of Americans, along with Dole, McCain who fought the Nazis for freedom, unlike the scumbags Dickie Cheeney, orange clown, etc!! Get it Deutschland??

[calim...@gmx.de]

So Bush 41 even back then was one of those neocons who meddled militarily in affairs on foreign continents???
Instead of letting those guys over there settle their conflicts themselves?

Wow ...


Max

[bob]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 18:37:32 -0700 (PDT), heyg...@gmail.com wrote:

>He has a daughter in school who wants to stay in DC. How horrible! Lol

she's out of school in june. he said he was moving to california. he
lied. he wants to stay around DC for political reasons. very bad form.

>Presidents have to buy huge houses--half is taken up by secret service. Bush bought two houses side by side...

i don't care how huge it is. i think it's bad form to stay in DC after
your term is up, you did your 8 yrs. step aside now, the other guy won
like it or not.

bob

[bob]

hell, can't keep trump in DC a wknd as it is. but yes, if he
criticized the next president or butted his nose into it, it'd be very
bad form.

bob

[bob]

maybe he will. and as of now, obama is the record holder.

bob

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:55:55 -0400, bob wrote:

> she's out of school in june. he said he was moving to california. he
> lied. he wants to stay around DC for political reasons. very bad form.

His daughter is 15 so she's not out of school. He stated for years that
he'd be staying in DC after his term, for at least a couple of years.
He's stated this since something like 2013! Want links?

Do try to read something other than Breitbart, please... you might learn
something new.

[bob]

On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 01:32:13 GMT, jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:55:55 -0400, bob wrote:
>
>> she's out of school in june. he said he was moving to california. he
>> lied. he wants to stay around DC for political reasons. very bad form.
>
>His daughter is 15 so she's not out of school. He stated for years that
>he'd be staying in DC after his term, for at least a couple of years.
>He's stated this since something like 2013! Want links?

he said just 3 months ago that he was moving to california in june
after the school yr ended.

>Do try to read something other than Breitbart, please... you might learn
>something new.

sorry, it's bad form. you know it.

bob

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:53:25 -0400, bob wrote:

> he said just 3 months ago that he was moving to california in june after
> the school yr ended.

Links?

>
>>Do try to read something other than Breitbart, please... you might learn
>>something new.
>
> sorry, it's bad form. you know it.

No, since he's said he'd be staying for the last 4 years... LOL

[jdeluise]

On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 01:55:04 +0000, jdeluise wrote:

> Links?

Everything I've found in a couple minutes of searching indicate that
indeed he bought a house in California but is planning on staying in
DC... (which is what I've read for some time now). But, I'd like to see
your links. Do you dare provide them?

[bob]

it's bad form to stay no matter what he said. but .... links?

bob

[jdeluise]

2 second search... article from 11/2013

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-may-be-a-rare-ex-president-who-stays-in-washington/2013/11/29/81ba049c-5912-11e3-8304-caf30787c0a9_story.html

Now where's your link from breitbart?

[bob]

i most certainly read it about 3 months ago, stuck in my head and i
think i posted it here. reacall it cause i got into an argument with a
friend telling me obama would never leave DC, and i defended obama
saying he was moving west.

obama said he was buying a home in california, and moving there right
after the school year. now it seems he'd rather stay in DC and try to
be a thorn in trump's side. it's bad form for any president to do
that. i'd say the same for anyone, except nobody else did it that i
know of. all the former presidents of my lifetime moved back to their
home states or something similar (well except for hillary who moved to
NY to become senator - very bad form lol). :-)

bob

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:20:43 -0400, bob wrote:

> i most certainly read it about 3 months ago, stuck in my head and i
> think i posted it here. reacall it cause i got into an argument with a
> friend telling me obama would never leave DC, and i defended obama
> saying he was moving west.
>
> obama said he was buying a home in california, and moving there right
> after the school year. now it seems he'd rather stay in DC and try to be
> a thorn in trump's side. it's bad form for any president to do that. i'd
> say the same for anyone, except nobody else did it that i know of. all
> the former presidents of my lifetime moved back to their home states or
> something similar (well except for hillary who moved to NY to become
> senator - very bad form lol). :-)

No links but your possibly faulty memory then? Worthless.

[bob]

oh, that's november. my reading of it was from post inauguration, feb
or later. and just look at the WaPo headline url: "may be a rare ex
president who stays in washington!"

lmao!!! get it yet?

bob

[heyg...@gmail.com]

They want Obama to follow every convention out there at the same time they want Trump to break them all...lol

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:22:48 -0400, bob wrote:


> oh, that's november. my reading of it was from post inauguration, feb or
> later. and just look at the WaPo headline url: "may be a rare ex
> president who stays in washington!"
>
> lmao!!! get it yet?

Are you drunk? The article is from 2013!

[bob]

i think these days my memory is better proof than "links." try
searching the national enquirer.

bob

[*skriptis]

jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

What does it matter if he was announcing it back in 2013 already?
It doesn't make it right.

It's still a bad form. He set a precedent. He was the one.

Now nothing is preventing Trump from doing the same. In fact, his
fans, I mean supporters will demand it.

And everyone should expect it.

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:27:47 -0400, bob wrote:

> i think these days my memory is better proof than "links." try searching
> the national enquirer.

Well unless Obama told you himself you probably got the information from
some "link"... too bad you can't share said link.

[jdeluise]

On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 04:23:51 +0200, *skriptis wrote:

> What does it matter if he was announcing it back in 2013 already?
> It doesn't make it right.
>
> It's still a bad form. He set a precedent. He was the one.
>
> Now nothing is preventing Trump from doing the same. In fact, his
> fans, I mean supporters will demand it.

Won't mean a thing to me if Trump does it... I'd expect he would anyway.
After all, he was doing it before he ran this time, except he was pushing
Hillary's and the neocon agenda.

[bob]

i don't save "links" to tabloid articles. and i'm sure it was a
tabloid, however, it seems obama did buy a house in palm springs
unless i'm mistaken. do you save links to everything you ever read in
case 'bob' from rst wants proof? lol.

but you miss the point, as usual. the point is not if he (or michele)
"said" he was leaving or staying, the pt is *he should leave.* he can
legally stay, but he should not stay.

bob

[bob]

ok, i saw november and you mentioned november before so i assumed it
and assumed you meant nov 2016. my mistake, but makes no difference,
can't you read the sentence?

"may be a rare ex president who stays in washington!"

what does that mean to you? and that's WaPo - being favorable toward
the man of course.

bob

[bob]

On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:37:22 GMT, jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 04:23:51 +0200, *skriptis wrote:
>
>> What does it matter if he was announcing it back in 2013 already?
>> It doesn't make it right.
>>
>> It's still a bad form. He set a precedent. He was the one.
>>
>> Now nothing is preventing Trump from doing the same. In fact, his
>> fans, I mean supporters will demand it.
>
>Won't mean a thing to me if Trump does it... I'd expect he would anyway.

i wouldn't.

>After all, he was doing it before he ran this time, except he was pushing
>Hillary's and the neocon agenda.

he was a private citizen, billioinaire. being an ex president is
supposed to hold a certain class and dignity, and bowing out
gracefully is part of that. obama is losing all his class, or the
class people thought he had.

bob

[jdeluise]

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:45:09 -0400, bob wrote:

> he was a private citizen, billioinaire. being an ex president is
> supposed to hold a certain class and dignity, and bowing out gracefully
> is part of that. obama is losing all his class, or the class people
> thought he had.

Nobody would ever accuse Trump of having class.

[bob]

that's fine, but we're not talking about trump.

bob