Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Lopez beat Nadal?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

John Doe

unread,
Oct 2, 2010, 9:34:48 PM10/2/10
to
I fell asleep too early, after Nadal had a set and was up in the
second. I thought it was over, that it was going to be a wipeout.
Rats.

Fan

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 1:52:57 AM10/3/10
to

Good, Nadal should not try to put in too much effort to win HC
tournaments.
I see that Sod and Birdshit got beat also. Leave something for others.
That is how it should be.

reilloc

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 2:09:46 AM10/3/10
to

I think you think you're being wise, philosophical and have divined the
order of the tennis universe. What you've done, though, is provided
further insight into your shallow, judgmental thought processes.

You despise those who praise too much players who are more perfect than
you can believe possible and commend halfheartedness in the discharge of
professional responsibility. You're a kind of a funny guy who I'd keep
an eye on if I knew you in real life.

LNC

Fan

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 2:24:28 AM10/3/10
to
You and I would not know each other in real life. I am polite with the
rest room attendants and thank them for the hand towel, leave a dollar
for tip but I do not get to know them.

wkhedr

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 2:34:00 AM10/3/10
to
On Oct 3, 8:09 am, reilloc <reil...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Normal retiree behavior.

TT

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 4:40:59 AM10/3/10
to
reilloc wrote:
> players who are more perfect than
> you can believe possible

This quote tells us all we need to know about you. Man, you're really a
twisted fuck.

TT

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 4:44:54 AM10/3/10
to

I mean wtf...do you seek from tennis a religious experience? Is this a
normal way to think for a fedfucker?

--
"I am no more a witch than you are a wizard, and if you take away my
life God will give you blood to drink"
-Sarah Good, 1692

John Doe

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 5:09:25 AM10/3/10
to
TT wrote:

> reilloc wrote:

>> players who are more perfect than you can believe possible

> This quote tells us all we need to know about you...do you seek


> from tennis a religious experience?

lol

Is he talking about Nadal the butt picker?

Raphael is great, but hardly perfect.

TT

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 5:24:47 AM10/3/10
to

I see your problem is low IQ. You have come to right place.

RzR

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 6:06:25 AM10/3/10
to
On 3.10.2010 11:24, TT wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
>> TT wrote:
>>> reilloc wrote:
>>
>>>> players who are more perfect than you can believe possible
>>
>>> This quote tells us all we need to know about you...do you seek
>>> from tennis a religious experience?
>>
>> lol
>> Is he talking about Nadal the butt picker?
>> Raphael is great, but hardly perfect.
>
> I see your problem is low IQ. You have come to right place.
>
>

right place = posts that reply to TT posts....no high IQ needed

Fan

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 7:35:06 AM10/3/10
to

He does have a problem, a problem I am not qualified to cure. I do not
see a problem with Nadal losing to Lopez. HC is Nadal's least favorite
surface. HC puts the most stress on his knees and his feet. If he must
play HC tournaments, he should put the most effort in the big ones.
Winning the USO was much more than I expected. I am still not sure if
it was worth it but everyone other than rabid insane Federer fans are
impressed with it. I see no reason to put everything in to become a HC
superstar. It is enough that he is a CC superstar and with his h2h he
is better than Federer, a better tennis player and a better human
being.

felangey

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 7:49:36 AM10/3/10
to
>a better tennis player and a better human being<

Not only are you a sanctimonious twit in every one of your posts, not only
do you demonstrate flawed logic to both tennis and life, but you
jaw-droppingly have a human being ranking system that you feel morally
obliged to apply to people you have never met and know only through the
magic of television? Astounding arrogance and fuckwittery.

You are a very strange type of grown up.


ocean

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 8:01:43 AM10/3/10
to

> Winning the USO was much more than I expected.

Winning AO AND USO was much more than I expected. His game is just not
made for HC but for natural surfaces like clay and grass. Period.

Superdave

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 8:02:06 AM10/3/10
to


Rafa was testing to see whether he could play WITHOUT cheating.

He lost!!!!!

ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Superdave

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 8:03:31 AM10/3/10
to


No. He is a fucking CHEATER !

Fan

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 8:57:05 AM10/3/10
to

It is hard to understand your fake outrage at my mild assessment of
Nadal vs. Federer compared to the vile filth we constantly see spewed
at Nadal from insane Federer fans.
You may not be as bad as some of the most rabid Federer fans but your
failure not to notice and protest those shows that you belong in the
same box with them.

Superdave

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 9:06:16 AM10/3/10
to


Your total failure to reco Rafa's CHEATING totally disqualifies you from any
criticism of Federer or his fans.

reilloc

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 12:06:20 PM10/3/10
to
On 10/3/2010 1:24 AM, Fan wrote:

> You and I would not know each other in real life. I am polite with the
> rest room attendants and thank them for the hand towel, leave a dollar
> for tip but I do not get to know them.

Your fantasy of our meeting in a mens room I'll not entertain in my
reply. It's enough to note, in passing, that in the public
accommodations you're used to using the guy to whom you handed the buck
was not an "attendant."

LNC

reilloc

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 12:18:13 PM10/3/10
to

I saw last night on Turner Classic Movies that they're showing
Hitchcock's Strangers on a Train next Saturday. If you like tennis and
want to see Robert Walker play Fan's prototype, check it out.

LNC

felangey

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 12:27:32 PM10/3/10
to
> Winning AO AND USO was much more than I expected. His game is just not
> made for HC but for natural surfaces like clay and grass. Period.<

Natural? You mean like those tennis courts that occur perfectly sub-based,
flat and true in the wilds of Outer-Mongolia?

felangey

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 12:34:38 PM10/3/10
to
>> You are a very strange type of grown up<<

>It is hard to understand your fake outrage at my mild assessment of


Nadal vs. Federer compared to the vile filth we constantly see spewed
at Nadal from insane Federer fans.<

I expressed no outrage whatsoever. If you weren't so blinkered you would see
that the wildest and most petty slander on this group is directed towards
Federer from haters like your sad little self.

>You may not be as bad as some of the most rabid Federer fans but your
failure not to notice and protest those shows that you belong in the
same box with them.<

And your unwillingness to pass judgement on any of Nadal's proven flaws,
while at once castigating and slandering Federer for every flaw you
partisanally perceive? Hypocrisy most horrid.

ocean

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 2:51:19 PM10/3/10
to

PMS or PMT?

Rodjk #613

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 4:38:12 PM10/3/10
to
On Oct 3, 7:57 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 1:49 pm, "felangey" <b...@home.com> wrote:
>
> > >a better tennis player and a better human being<
>
> > Not only are you a sanctimonious twit in every one of your posts, not only
> > do you demonstrate flawed logic to both tennis and life, but you
> > jaw-droppingly have a human being ranking system that you feel morally
> > obliged to apply to people you have never met and know only through the
> > magic of television? Astounding arrogance and fuckwittery.
>
> > You are a very strange type of grown up.
>
> It is hard to understand your fake outrage at my mild assessment of
> Nadal vs. Federer compared to the vile filth we constantly see spewed
> at Nadal from insane Federer fans.

Both players have fans (on RST) that are nuts.

> You may not be as bad as some of the most rabid Federer fans but your
> failure not to notice and protest those shows that you belong in the
> same box with them.

Many of us have left comments on the insanity and hatred of both
groups.

Rodjk #613

RzR

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 5:11:39 PM10/3/10
to
On 3.10.2010 13:35, Fan wrote:
> a better tennis player and a better human
> being.
>


haha pure gold...not even the strongest drugs can cause this type of
halucinations...one must be born with it, a talent in a way :)

RzR

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 5:15:03 PM10/3/10
to


kind of funny that these sad excuses for fans fail to recognise that
nadal is cheating...it only means that they are themselves cheaters in
their life or worse...

Whisper

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 10:52:04 PM10/3/10
to


It's not cheating when you give your opponents more time to recover from
the punishment you're dishing out. Djoko was sucking air big time in
USO final & you could see he wanted even longer breaks between points.

Rafa should get a humanitarian award.


Superdave

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 11:01:28 PM10/3/10
to


Djocker and Rafa are birds of a feather. Both CHEATERS!

John Doe

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 11:30:42 PM10/3/10
to
RzR <2r4z0r2 gmail.com> wrote:

> kind of funny that these sad excuses for fans fail to recognise
> that nadal is cheating...it only means that they are themselves
> cheaters in their life or worse...

Rules are my thing. Please enlighten me about how (you think)
Rafael Nadal is cheating?

John Doe

unread,
Oct 3, 2010, 11:45:22 PM10/3/10
to
Umm... If you mean by yelling/grunting, yeah I understand that one.

Fan

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 5:17:26 AM10/4/10
to
On Oct 3, 6:34 pm, "felangey" <o...@cloudnine.com> wrote:
> >> You are a very strange type of grown up<<
> >It is hard to understand your fake outrage at my mild assessment of
>
> Nadal vs. Federer compared to the vile filth we constantly see spewed
> at Nadal from insane Federer fans.<
>
> I expressed no outrage whatsoever. If you weren't so blinkered you would see
> that the wildest and most petty slander on this group is directed towards
> Federer from haters like your sad little self.

The problem with insane Federer fangs such as you that you see hate in
anything less Federer worship.


>
> >You may not be as bad as some of the most rabid Federer fans but your
>
> failure not to notice and protest those shows that you belong in the
> same box with them.<
>
> And your unwillingness to pass judgement on any of Nadal's proven flaws,
> while at once castigating and slandering Federer for every flaw you
> partisanally perceive? Hypocrisy most horrid.

You are wrong again insane Federer fang. I expressed my displeasure
with Nadal's grabbing his shorts before service. It is an irritating
habit that I would prefer to see him stop but nothing compared to
Federer's tantrums, sobbing like a spoiled rotten child and his abuse
of ball boys.
Nadal’s irritating habit is free game but it is not a character issue.
Federer’s out of control tantrums are a character issue.


Sakari Lund

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 5:51:54 AM10/4/10
to

And that's the thing that shows Fan is trolling. He writes novels
about insane Federer fans, but acts like the other group doesn't exist
at all, when in fact it is at least as insane, and if not larger at
least more vocal.

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 6:53:38 AM10/4/10
to

you and Raja should get a room together!

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 6:59:59 AM10/4/10
to
On 3 Oct, 09:44, TT <d...@email.me> wrote:

> TT wrote:
> > reilloc wrote:
> >> players who are more perfect than you can believe possible
>
> > This quote tells us all we need to know about you. Man, you're really a
> > twisted fuck.
>
> I mean wtf...do you seek from tennis a religious experience? Is this a
> normal way to think for a fedfucker?

according to them Fed is beyond perfect!!

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 7:01:07 AM10/4/10
to

this is one of the best and most sensible posts I've seen here in a
very long time.

Fan

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 7:06:08 AM10/4/10
to
> Rafa should get a humanitarian award.-

The biggest problem insane Federer fans have with Nadal is that he
keeps beating their hero. We should understand their problem and treat
them with understanding.
I am not a Sampras fan but he was 100% on when he said something like
Federer would have a hard time with his legacy with Nadal kicking his
ass all over the place.
Maybe Sampras did not use exactly these words but he could have and he
would have been right.

RzR

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 7:06:18 AM10/4/10
to

getting illegal coaching from the box...he admited it himself...2 fake
medicals against petzschner in wimbledon...one for his arm, and one for
his leg, yet he still kept on hitting the ball and running like there is
no tomorrow...calling fake medicals to unsettle his opponent =
cheating...and finally...taking too much time between serves, especially
on break points and important points...way too noticable to just let it
slide...why ATP judges dont enforce this rule is beyond me...it must be
generating a lot of cash when nadal does well

funny thing is that nadal doesnt need all these things to have same
results...or at least i dont think so...

RzR

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 7:08:22 AM10/4/10
to
On 4.10.2010 5:45, John Doe wrote:
> Umm... If you mean by yelling/grunting, yeah I understand that one.

i dont mind that one as far as the opponent is concerned, but if someone
does it loud as hell or way after they hit the ball, it could be
cheating also, i.e. they are doing it on purpose

Iceberg

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 7:42:48 AM10/4/10
to

what about that time Fed whistled and went OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOO, after
Nadal hit some crazy shot past him?

drew

unread,
Oct 4, 2010, 11:03:24 AM10/4/10
to

And I wonder if it was in fact a hand "towel" that Fan paid the
dollar for. The
not getting to know them part was probably pretty accurate though.

Just avoid public washrooms if you can, especially at tennis events.
If you have to
and some polite fellow asks you for a hand towel, run don't walk to
the nearest exit.

Fan

unread,
Oct 5, 2010, 12:48:59 AM10/5/10
to

It is curious how the sick perversion of insane Federer fangs surfaces
no matter what the topic is.

I was simply trying to explain to some of you low lives that there is
absolutely no chance of us meeting in real life unless you were a rest
room attendant providing towels or the janitor mopping the floors
while working late on a project requiring evening work.

Another possible way some of you losers could get near someone like me
is if you took the money out of your children’s mouth to purchase on
credit and drive a truck to work and cut in front of someone who could
easily afford a large truck but prefers to drive a fuel efficient
passenger vehicle.

0 new messages