>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yeah, it's hard to know with Del Potro how much of his clowning was due to injuries and how much due to other factors. I mean the guy has never won a Masters 1000 event. Surely, he should have been able to do that in his good periods if he was so fabulous. He's a weird player, very hot and cold at the best of times. When he's "on" he can beat any of the Big Four players though, which is something I guess.
>> >>>
>> >>> Roddick could never Fed if his life depended on it!!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Potro's win over Fed in USO final was a fluke. It should have been 63
>> >> 76 64, or at worst 63 67 64 76 to Fed. Ok he got lucky 1 day in his
>> >> life & won 2 tie-breaks to win in 5, but fuck me if I'm going to rate
>> >> him among the elite based on winning 1 match in 10 yrs. Go away.
>> >
>> > Why can't you consider his last Olympic run, for exemple ?
>> >
>> > Also, DelPotro raised his level more often then Roddick did, when facing big 4 members.
>> > Doesn't h2h count these days, or is it only to lower Fed's legacy ?!
>> >
>> > I was among the few to burn DelPotro's choice concerning the first DC final he might have played (playing quite poorly at WTF instead, and getting or worsening, can't remember for sure, an injury), yet I tend to rank him higher than (the otherwise highly lovable) ARod in that One Slam Wonder group.
>> >
>> > Younger DelPo was a bit a jerk to me, the way he fought his way back after quite a bunch of serious injuries / surgery, has won me over.
>> > Loved his 2016 season, not matter he didn't win anything "big".
>> >
>>
>> If you presented Roddick's record v Potro's to an impartial audience &
>> not knowing who the players were, just their stats - then really it'd be
>> 99% in favor of Roddick, if not 100%.
>
> As long as your "impartial audience" is from USA I can totally agree with you "guess".
>
> Then show to the same "impartial audience" highlights from both players versus top players they lost to / win against, I am totally ready to bet that your "raw stats results" won't get that much considerations.
>
> Try to determine a player's legacy by using zero knowledge/interested people polls is mainly a bad joke.
> We are, well, not really all RSTers for sure, tennis educated folks.
>
> Some of us play tennis, and even compete in, despite their age !
> Like myself (I turned 46 two days ago) :-)
> I've been playing one tournament per year: the one I've been "hosting" most of the time, for the last 15 years or so, on behalf of the small club in parent's village La Bastide de Serou (
http://www.comite.fft.fr/comite.ariege/23L00090_a/cms/index_public.php?PHPSESSID=332b8399277e8e24532013fadf2c5bfb&us_action=show_note_rubrique&ui_id_site=1&ui_id_rubrique=10205)
>