Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

20 months ago..

1 view
Skip to first unread message

bob

unread,
Apr 1, 2011, 10:01:07 PM4/1/11
to
..federer beat roddick at Wimbledon and pronounced he would be peak
for at least 2 more years (that's 24 months btw).

got to say, this peak fed guy needs to work on his FH and BH a bit.

bob

John Liang

unread,
Apr 1, 2011, 11:17:01 PM4/1/11
to

Back in Wimbledon 99 Sampras played a great match to beat Agassi what
was your advise
this peak Sampras guy in 2001 when him was thrashed by Safin then
Hewitt in successive USO final?

Carey

unread,
Apr 2, 2011, 1:56:42 AM4/2/11
to

Your daddy Whisper said in 2006 that Federer had already peaked.
And you certainly must bow (kneel?) before to his tier-1 expertise..

bob

unread,
Apr 2, 2011, 12:58:26 PM4/2/11
to

sampras never told the world he was peak and expected to be for at
least 2 more yrs.

bob

John Liang

unread,
Apr 2, 2011, 9:01:01 PM4/2/11
to
On Apr 3, 2:58 am, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:17:01 -0700 (PDT), John Liang
>

But he was at his peak in that final. With that sort of form did you
expect him to be taken
to the cleaner by Safin and Hewitt in USO within similar time span ?
It is pretty clear
that Federer 2011 isn't in the form of Federer in 2009 or earlier. He
is declining just any
other players of his age. Would Sampras after winning Wimbledon in
1999 believe he would
not win a slam for two years ?

bob

unread,
Apr 3, 2011, 7:18:04 AM4/3/11
to
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:01:01 -0700 (PDT), John Liang
<jlia...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 3, 2:58 am, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:17:01 -0700 (PDT), John Liang
>>
>> <jlian...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 2, 1:01 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> ..federer beat roddick at Wimbledon and pronounced he would be peak
>> >> for at least 2 more years (that's 24 months btw).
>>
>> >> got to say, this peak fed guy needs to work on his FH and BH a bit.
>>
>> >> bob
>>
>> >Back in Wimbledon 99 Sampras played a great match to beat Agassi what
>> >was your advise
>> >this peak Sampras guy  in 2001 when him was thrashed by Safin then
>> >Hewitt in successive USO final?
>>
>> sampras never told the world he was peak and expected to be for at
>> least 2 more yrs.
>>
>> bob
>
>But he was at his peak in that final.

and to quote roger, "and i, like most other players, expect to remain
at my peak til age 30".

> With that sort of form did you
>expect him to be taken
>to the cleaner by Safin and Hewitt in USO within similar time span ?

he was in terrible form losing to nobodies - but roger only loses to
nadal and now djok.

>It is pretty clear
>that Federer 2011 isn't in the form of Federer in 2009 or earlier. He
>is declining just any
>other players of his age. Would Sampras after winning Wimbledon in
>1999 believe he would
>not win a slam for two years ?

absolutely - he was burnt out. fed said even a few months ago he was
extremely motivated.

bob

John Liang

unread,
Apr 3, 2011, 8:20:14 AM4/3/11
to
On Apr 3, 9:18 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:01:01 -0700 (PDT), John Liang
>
>
>
>
>
> <jlian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 3, 2:58 am, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:17:01 -0700 (PDT), John Liang
>
> >> <jlian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Apr 2, 1:01 pm, bob <stein...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >> ..federer beat roddick at Wimbledon and pronounced he would be peak
> >> >> for at least 2 more years (that's 24 months btw).
>
> >> >> got to say, this peak fed guy needs to work on his FH and BH a bit.
>
> >> >> bob
>
> >> >Back in Wimbledon 99 Sampras played a great match to beat Agassi what
> >> >was your advise
> >> >this peak Sampras guy in 2001 when him was thrashed by Safin then
> >> >Hewitt in successive USO final?
>
> >> sampras never told the world he was peak and expected to be for at
> >> least 2 more yrs.
>
> >> bob
>
> >But he was at his peak in that final.
>
> and to quote roger, "and i, like most other players, expect to remain
> at my peak til age 30".

Doesn't mean he will be.

>
> >  With that sort of form did you
> >expect him to be taken
> >to the cleaner by Safin and Hewitt in USO within similar time span ?
>
> he was in terrible form losing to nobodies - but roger only loses to
> nadal and now djok.

Prior to the final he was beating a lot of good players but he was
killed by two
very hot player in the finals.


>
> >It is pretty clear
> >that Federer 2011 isn't in the form of Federer in 2009 or earlier.  He
> >is declining just any
> >other players of his age.  Would Sampras after winning Wimbledon in
> >1999 believe he would
> >not win a slam for two years ?
>
> absolutely - he was burnt out. fed said even a few months ago he was
> extremely motivated.

>
> bob- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

0 new messages