On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 12:42:45 PM UTC+6, The Iceberg wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 August 2017 07:04:12 UTC+1, AZ wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 4:25:22 AM UTC+6, The Iceberg wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 20:06:30 UTC+1, AZ wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 12:46:25 AM UTC+6, RaspingDrive wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 2:42:24 PM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 15:06:18 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 5:17:28 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> > > > > > > > Lol yeah he figured him out at the AO by going 5 sets and being a break down LOL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did Federer beat Nadal to win the AO 2017? Just asking. Also, did Federer beat Nadal at IW and Miami in 2017 or were you comatose in your ditch?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did Federer lose to every clown under the sun on hc like Nadal did since he won his last hc title a few years ago? On grass and hc, Nadal has lost to a who's who of clowns for years. That's what must have made Federer finally say "enough is enough" and get him to be more aggressive on his bh vs Nadal. Fed saw all of those imbeciles Nadal was losing to on hc and said, "if they can beat him surely I(as the GOAT) can as well."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can Nadal win Cinci when Djokovic, Federer, Murray, Wawrinka, Cilic, Raonic and Nishikori are all out? Which players of note are left in this tournament that Nadal should lose to? If Nadal can't win this one, he should be embarrassed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it was his bh and he figured him out in 5 sets and a break down, but then he was too chicken to play him on clay. Amazing.
> > > > >
> > > > > He skipped clay to take the W record, eclipsing the great Sampras. You are sore over that on top of Andy shitting in slams this year. Hopefully, next year will be good for you ;)
> > > >
> > > > He has been having a lot of fun trolling lately.
> > >
> > > oh yes anything you can't argue against is trolling, duh.
> >
> > But that's a tautology. If there is a list of types of posters with whom you cannot have a reasonable argument based discussion, a troll has to figure very high on that list.
> >
> > You are a troll.
>
> no, you are the troll, all you ever do is whinge about Nadal
No. But you do. All the time. You hate Nadal. Because he surpassed Sampras.
> and what people say about him and bend any stat to make Fed look good,
No. You, on other hand, secretly love Fed. You just don't want anybody to know. So, you have created this anti-Fed persona with outlandish madeup stories.
> then you threaten anyone who disagrees with violence (like a typical Fedfan).
Sure, I wore my heart on my sleeve one time, just like Trump does every single day. Just like Trump said he could shoot a person on the fifth avenue and nothing would happen. But you are not a real supporter of Trump. You are an easily triggered hipster SJW fruitcake Hillary supporter. That's why you shout violence, violence all the time when there is none. A real Trump supporter would suck it up like a cowboy.
Admit it, your whole existence here is a fake facade. You yourself do not believe a single word you say.
> That's not reasonable posting.
Sure. It would be true if it actually happened. But we all know by now that you mean the opposite of what you write. So that makes me... wait for it... eminently reasonable!!
> Also it's laughable that *you* claim to define what a 'troll' is, when you're one of the most ridiculously biased posters on here.
Which means I just might be the most rational poster here. Thanks for the confidence boost.
How can anybody not love this fake persona, internet troll, closet SJW, closet Fedfan, closet Hillary fan ? You are so adorable.