How long until these whiny liberals ...

[stephenJ]

... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
"Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
awful for humanity!".

Any day now?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[jdeluise]

On Thu, 04 May 2017 15:53:04 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
> awful for humanity!".
>
> Any day now?

What did he get done? You do realize that passing the house doesn't make
repeal/replace the law of the land (and yes, it is embarrassing to have
to explain this to a uni prof)?

[stephenJ]

The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
mean that a bill has become law.

Trump is getting immense things done and you liberals hate it, LOL.

[reilloc]

On 5/4/2017 3:53 PM, stephenJ wrote:
> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
> awful for humanity!".
>
> Any day now?

Did we blink and he signed the Free Cheetos and Mountain Dew Executive
Order?

Damn...

LNC

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[jdeluise]

On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
> mean that a bill has become law.

Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!

>
> Trump is getting immense things done and you liberals hate it, LOL.

If by getting things done you mean "bowing to Democrat demands" and
"caving or failing on nearly all of his campaign promises", sure. I hope
he continues this!

[stephenJ]

On 5/4/2017 7:01 PM, jdeluise wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>
>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
>> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
>> mean that a bill has become law.
>
> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor"

Doubling down on stupid, LOL.

PS - Trump is still President. :)

[jdeluise]

On Thu, 04 May 2017 19:38:11 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> On 5/4/2017 7:01 PM, jdeluise wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think
>>> that my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone
>>> doesn't mean that a bill has become law.
>>
>> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor"
>
> Doubling down on stupid, LOL.

Well you have to admit your post was stupid, why not double down?

[PeteWasLucky]

> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
"Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
awful for humanity!".

Any day now?

Seriously how old are you?

[The Iceberg]

is it as embarrassing as voting for Hillary and then Trump winning! LOL

[The Iceberg]

On Friday, 5 May 2017 00:38:03 UTC+1, reilloc wrote:
> On 5/4/2017 3:53 PM, stephenJ wrote:
> > ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
> > "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
> > awful for humanity!".
> >
> > Any day now?
>
> Did we blink and he signed the Free Cheetos and Mountain Dew Executive
> Order?
>
> Damn...

that would rule if he did that! you college age guys would like that too!

[stephenJ]

My post was spot-on. Your reply was really dumb, hence the embarrassment
of tripling-down on it.

[soccerfan777]

Stephen J cannot be older than 10. Truly juvenile dumbass

[Whisper]

On 5/05/2017 10:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>
>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
>> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
>> mean that a bill has become law.
>
> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
>

Not all professors are bright. We had a female one here in the paper
yesterday blaming casinos for her addiction, losing 300k & going bankrupt.

[Pelle Svanslös]

"A new longitudinal study into the relationship between measured levels
of intelligence, and addiction shows a marked tendency toward more
addiction behavior among those with higher IQs -- twice as much for men,
and a three times greater likelihood among women."

http://www.cnsproductions.com/drugeducationblog/dr-darryl-inaba/1198

:)

[stephenJ]

On 5/5/2017 9:23 AM, Whisper wrote:
> On 5/05/2017 10:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
>>> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
>>> mean that a bill has become law.
>>
>> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
>> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
>>
>
>
> Not all professors are bright.

Sad but true. Tenure can grow dead wood.

[jdeluise]

On Fri, 05 May 2017 07:11:28 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

>
> My post was spot-on. Your reply was really dumb, hence the embarrassment
> of tripling-down on it.
>

You mean your post which claimed "victory" after the repeal/replace
passed just the house? lol...

[Whisper]

Addiction is one thing, but gambling? That's just simple math.
Gambling is a tax on people who aren't good at math.

[Whisper]

On 6/05/2017 1:29 AM, stephenJ wrote:
> On 5/5/2017 9:23 AM, Whisper wrote:
>> On 5/05/2017 10:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>>> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think that
>>>> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
>>>> mean that a bill has become law.
>>>
>>> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
>>> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
>>>
>>
>>
>> Not all professors are bright.
>
> Sad but true. Tenure can grow dead wood.
>
>
>

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/addicted-poker-machine-user-wants-stronger-controls-to-stop-outofcontrol-gambling-20170504-gvygnb.html

[Pelle Svanslös]

Okie dokie.

--
“Donald Trump is the weak man’s vision of a strong man.”
-- Charles Cooke

[bob]

On Thu, 4 May 2017 15:53:04 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
>"Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
>awful for humanity!".
>
>Any day now?

i recall you advising a lady named peach to abstain from voting since
she refused to vote trump. i laughed a few hours over that. :-)

bob

[bob]

On Sat, 6 May 2017 02:52:32 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>
wrote:

always recall stopping off at the grocery store on the way to work to
pick up a sandwich at 7am right when they open.

always a line of folks there in the lottery window - the kind of folks
that could use a sandwich far more than that lottery ticket. it was
sad.

bob

[*skriptis]

bob <b...@nospam.net> Wrote in message:

Still, lottery isn't that expensive and there's no immediate
payoff that could create the illusion of "winning" like gambling
does, so there should be no addiction effect, hormones effect
etc.

It's a conscious, one could say desperate, but a conscious
decision to buy that ticket.




--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[bob]

those people were paying the $5-10 for lottery tix in hopes of winning
something, when mathematically it was an incredibly poor bet. OTOH,
that $5 could buy a very nice sandwich.

>It's a conscious, one could say desperate, but a conscious
> decision to buy that ticket.

bob

[Whisper]

Here it's mostly older retired folk buying tickets, & it's the ones that
could least afford it spending like 25% of their pension.

Sure the 'dream' keeps some of them going/living in hope, but why not
throw $5 at a ticket instead of $100+ every week?



--
"A GOAT who isn't BOAT can never become GOAT if he plays alongside BOAT"

[stephenJ]

Anyone can see that my post did no such thing. Quadrupling down on your
stupidity, LOL.

[stephenJ]

People like to make excuses for their bad choices.

FWIW, my wife likes to gamble, really the whole experience of getting
dolled up, having some drinks, playing the slots, etc. We do that once a
week.

I go along because though I know the odds and don't really derive
enjoyment from betting, she looks amazing dressed to the nines and it
puts her in the mood so to speak, but I also maintain a tight budget on
it. To me the moment I withdraw the cash the money is at that moment
lost, I have no expectations of ever seeing it again and of course 95%
of the time we play until we lose it all. Most importantly, it's always
a sum that fits well inside our budget for entertainment so does no harm
to the family finances, and she accepts that once the money for that
outing is spent, that's it, no going to the ATM machine for more, LOL.
Even when we go to Las Vegas, as part of the trip I set an overall
gambling budget in advance, and she knows she has that much to spend and
no more.

It's no different to me than spending the money on anything else that is
consumed instantly, like a steak dinner at a nice restaurant or tickets
to a play or concert.

This professor obviously let things get out of control.

[stephenJ]

We're still facebook friends but she's obviously blocked any of my posts
from her feed, as she never "likes" anything I post, even pictures of
fuzzy animals, LOL. She's still very angry about the Hillary loss, her
daughter spent time up in N. Dakota freezing with those pipeline
protesters while i gloated about the cops clearing them all out so the
oil could flow, LOL. :)

[The Iceberg]

I often buy a ticket or two, it would rule to win the lottery, but spending 10's of pounds on it would be crazy, mind you have known guys earning a lot of money that spend at least £100 on it a month, they say cos it then they're in it with a better chance.

[jdeluise]

On Sun, 07 May 2017 06:32:57 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> On 5/5/2017 11:25 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 May 2017 07:11:28 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My post was spot-on. Your reply was really dumb, hence the
>>> embarrassment of tripling-down on it.
>>>
>>>
>> You mean your post which claimed "victory" after the repeal/replace
>> passed just the house?
>
> Anyone can see that my post did no such thing. Quadrupling down on your
> stupidity, LOL.
>

No use denying it now Stephen, it's all in the archives. Back to the
kiddie table for you!

[Pelle Svanslös]

Embarrassing, really.

[stephenJ]

On 5/7/2017 12:02 PM, jdeluise wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2017 06:32:57 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>
>> On 5/5/2017 11:25 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>>> On Fri, 05 May 2017 07:11:28 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> My post was spot-on. Your reply was really dumb, hence the
>>>> embarrassment of tripling-down on it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You mean your post which claimed "victory" after the repeal/replace
>>> passed just the house?
>>
>> Anyone can see that my post did no such thing. Quadrupling down on your
>> stupidity, LOL.
>>
>

> No use denying it now Stephen ..

Yep, your stupidity is undeniable. Quintupling? Sad.

[jdeluise]

On Sun, 07 May 2017 12:38:06 -0500, stephenJ wrote:


>
> Yep, your stupidity is undeniable. Quintupling? Sad.
>

If you need help with the facts, this should be about your level... and
no calling "fake news", OK?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Otbml6WIQPo

[soccerfan777]

Is Stephen J entering Jim Carrey - Jeff Daniels level territory here

[stephenJ]

On 5/7/2017 1:10 PM, jdeluise wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2017 12:38:06 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Yep, your stupidity is undeniable. Quintupling? Sad.
>>
>
> If you need help with the facts

Still talking stupid. What's that, seven posts in a row?

[jdeluise]

On Sun, 07 May 2017 14:56:22 -0500, stephenJ wrote:

> On 5/7/2017 1:10 PM, jdeluise wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 May 2017 12:38:06 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yep, your stupidity is undeniable. Quintupling? Sad.
>>>
>>>
>> If you need help with the facts
>
> Still talking stupid. What's that, seven posts in a row?
>

Can't fool the archives Stephen, you clearly thought Obamacare was
repealed/replaced. lol

[stephenJ]

On 5/7/2017 3:05 PM, jdeluise wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2017 14:56:22 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>
>> On 5/7/2017 1:10 PM, jdeluise wrote:
>>> On Sun, 07 May 2017 12:38:06 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yep, your stupidity is undeniable. Quintupling? Sad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If you need help with the facts
>>
>> Still talking stupid. What's that, seven posts in a row?
>>
>
> Can't fool the archives Stephen

Yep, the archive shows how dumb you were, all in an attempt to salve
your Trump wounds, LOL.

[bob]

jaros' orig post claimed a victory of sorts with the house vote to
repeal obamacare. i'd say it's a victory for anyone who would like
obamacare repealed, no doubt. whether it's in the books yet, or not,
doesn't mean it's not a victory and step in the right direction.

bob

[bob]

On Sun, 7 May 2017 17:58:02 +1000, Whisper <beav...@ozemail.com>

true - that "dream" of winning millions keeps them eating catfood
rather than a nice rotisserie chicken from the grocery store (well,
here at least). that's why i think lotteries should be abolished.

bob

[bob]

On Sun, 7 May 2017 06:44:09 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>On 5/5/2017 12:01 PM, Whisper wrote:
>> On 6/05/2017 1:29 AM, stephenJ wrote:
>>> On 5/5/2017 9:23 AM, Whisper wrote:
>>>> On 5/05/2017 10:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 04 May 2017 18:32:03 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The only thing embarrassing here is you being dumb enough to think
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> my post implied that I don't know that passing the House alone doesn't
>>>>>> mean that a bill has become law.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
>>>>> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not all professors are bright.
>>>
>>> Sad but true. Tenure can grow dead wood.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/addicted-poker-machine-user-wants-stronger-controls-to-stop-outofcontrol-gambling-20170504-gvygnb.html
>
>People like to make excuses for their bad choices.
>
>FWIW, my wife likes to gamble, really the whole experience of getting
>dolled up, having some drinks, playing the slots, etc. We do that once a
>week.

and she wins though. :-)

>I go along because though I know the odds and don't really derive
>enjoyment from betting, she looks amazing dressed to the nines and it
>puts her in the mood so to speak, but I also maintain a tight budget on
>it. To me the moment I withdraw the cash the money is at that moment
>lost, I have no expectations of ever seeing it again and of course 95%
>of the time we play until we lose it all. Most importantly, it's always
>a sum that fits well inside our budget for entertainment so does no harm
>to the family finances, and she accepts that once the money for that
>outing is spent, that's it, no going to the ATM machine for more, LOL.
>Even when we go to Las Vegas, as part of the trip I set an overall
>gambling budget in advance, and she knows she has that much to spend and
>no more.
>It's no different to me than spending the money on anything else that is
>consumed instantly, like a steak dinner at a nice restaurant or tickets
>to a play or concert.
>This professor obviously let things get out of control.

1st time i gambled as a 23year old guy in lake tahoe lost money
immediately on roulette, then went to the atm (bad idea). lost more.
stayed awake all night drunk arguing with my ski friends, and ruining
my ski trip thinking how to get it back. next night, lost more. :-)

then i learned a little about craps and found myself able for the next
couple decades to periodically go into a casino and either play for
hours losing very little, or actually win maybe once in a blue moon.
but great fun!

bob

[bob]

On Sun, 7 May 2017 06:48:00 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>On 5/6/2017 7:46 PM, bob wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 May 2017 15:53:04 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
>>> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
>>> awful for humanity!".
>>>
>>> Any day now?
>>
>> i recall you advising a lady named peach to abstain from voting since
>> she refused to vote trump. i laughed a few hours over that. :-)
>
>We're still facebook friends but she's obviously blocked any of my posts
>from her feed, as she never "likes" anything I post, even pictures of
>fuzzy animals, LOL. She's still very angry about the Hillary loss, her
>daughter spent time up in N. Dakota freezing with those pipeline
>protesters while i gloated about the cops clearing them all out so the
>oil could flow, LOL. :)

lol.

when you said, "peach, can i just get you to abstain?" i laughed my
ass off. you chumped that woman in the worst way and she hadn't a
clue!

herb and rich have blocked me i believe - and i'm happier that way.

bob

[stephenJ]

Amazing that 'jdeluise' was never able to grasp that, even though we all
know it's not in the books yet.

I chalk it up to deep denial over the fact of Trump's presidency?

[stephenJ]

That's the best way to handle gambling - view the rolls of the dice or
spins of the wheel as entertainment, and you are paying to be
entertained. Then the "loss" of money is fine, as long as it fits your
budget.

I feel bad for this professor and her partner (?), but no way do they
deserve a cent back from her losses, that is 100% on her. Heck, if they
refund her money how do they avoid doing so for everyone else who lost
at their casino the past three years? She enjoyed the ride of gambling
(and she sure wasn't going to give any money back had she won, LOL) and
now wants a bailout. Sad.

[stephenJ]

Yes, i get nothing from them these days either though we're still
'friends' too. Funny, because while I was extremely disappointed by
Obama's election (twice!) i never threw tantrums and cut people off.

Rich i can take or leave, i just know him from a college football forum,
but Herb and i grew up together, I met him as a 3rd grader in 1973 and
we were friends/classmates through high school. Worry about him too
because he seems very troubled.

[Guypers]

Rich and Herb, who????

[Pelle Svanslös]

If the coherence of Jaros posts as of late is anything to go by, they're
things you put in your pipe.

[jdeluise]

On Sun, 07 May 2017 20:10:46 -0400, bob wrote:

>
> jaros' orig post claimed a victory of sorts with the house vote to
> repeal obamacare. i'd say it's a victory for anyone who would like
> obamacare repealed, no doubt. whether it's in the books yet, or not,
> doesn't mean it's not a victory and step in the right direction.
>
> bob

He wrote 'Trump is getting everything he said he would done'... so far
he's spent tens of millions on travel expenses on your dime so he can
consume entire weekends on the golf course while his most prominent
executive orders are shot down... Obamacare isn't repealed/replaced, no
wall in sight, the "swamp" is filled with billionaire goldman sachs
types, etc. I know it's hard to face the facts, but you picked a dud.


< cue "but Hillary" replies >

[The Iceberg]

Yes must be very embarrassing that you voted Remoan and jd voted and campaigned for Hillary! Lol

[The Iceberg]

Hillary lost, Trump, it been over 100 days now, just get over it!

[jdeluise]

On Mon, 08 May 2017 09:25:09 -0700, The Iceberg wrote:

> Hillary lost, Trump, it been over 100 days now, just get over it!

Seems the only people who can't get over it are part of the Trump mob...?

[heyg...@gmail.com]

Trump is getting done exactly what he wants to get done, which is make money for himself. Every visit to one of his properties makes him money. He's playing nice with every country where he has deals pending. That's his priority. He'll also help Rs pass some of their priorities (especially if it undoes some of Obama's legacy), basically in exchange for them looking the other way and not investigating any of it.

[calim...@gmx.de]

Trump has enough money. Liberal idiots like you still don't understand this clown. That's why you lost. And that's why you will lose again if you are unwilling to understand what drives Trump.


Max

[heyg...@gmail.com]

Trump is never going to get what he really wants...proxies are the best he can do.

[*skriptis]

heyg...@gmail.com Wrote in message:

So he's not dumb after all?

Remember 'liberals' were molesting us with how inadequate,
incapacitated, stupid etc he is.
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[heyg...@gmail.com]

I don't think anyone ever said he was dumb in terms of taking advantage of a situation...that's what everyone said he's best at. If you gave him a US citizenship test he'd probably fail, though.

[The Iceberg]

didn't you say this during the election LOL there's a great youtube video where they have all the idiot Clinton News Networkers etc saying this.

[Guypers]

I thought he had already shtupped Ivanka?

[*skriptis]

So what? Those tests are designed for immigrants, not to test
home people.

[heyg...@gmail.com]

You don't think the head of the government should know enough to pass a rudimentary civics test?

[*skriptis]

I'm talking about real life. E.g. not many doctors in their 60s
could pass anatomy test in their first attempt without any
reading and preparation, even though they work as doctors and are
qualified.

[heyg...@gmail.com]

You think a doctor couldn't pass a high school biology test? That's about the equivalent of the citizenship test. You may need a new doctor...lol

Trump's only real life skill is scamming people. Nearly all his legit businesses were failures. Why do you think the only banks that would finance him for the past decade were from Russia? If American banks thought he could make a buck they'd finance him in a minute.

[*skriptis]

Yeah, maybe they'd pass on biology. But what about history or
literature?

> Trump's only real life skill is scamming people. Nearly all his legit businesses were failures. Why do you think the only banks that would finance him for the past decade were from Russia? If American banks thought he could make a buck they'd finance him in a minute.

This bank stuff is boring. You know nothing aside you've red in
media. Djokovic took Uniqlo and not Nike, big deal.

[bmo...@nyx.net]

Here are some practice citizenship tests...

https://www.test-guide.com/free-citizenship-practice-tests.html

[heyg...@gmail.com]

Maybe you should try reading a little more...

[*skriptis]

Fairy tales?

[heyg...@gmail.com]

That actually might help you. Maybe there's one that explains the role/term of the FBI director...

[*skriptis]

Not interested much. The thing is, Trump either can fire him, or not.

If he's operating within his jurisdiction, it's ok. If not, he
usurped power and has staged a coup.

Which one is it?

[The Iceberg]

It hilarious you're gullable enough to believe the joke fake news that Trump is just a scammer etc you must find it really stunning a guy like that made it to president lolol

[The Iceberg]

Trump would doubtless beat Hillary in these tests.

[The Iceberg]

These whiny liberals have so much sour grapes they spent ages moaning about Comey, then Trump sacks him and they keep on moaning, they never happy, they should get over that Trump WON!!!

[heyg...@gmail.com]

You can act under your jurisdiction, but if the reason is to obstruct an investigation, then it's illegal.

[*skriptis]

And you know that how?

[Patrick Kehoe]

On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:53:06 PM UTC-7, StephenJ wrote:
> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
> awful for humanity!".
>
> Any day now?

Move just a bit too far left OR right on the political spectrum in the US and everyone sounds a few items short on their grocery lists...

P

[heyg...@gmail.com]

Because the law says so.

[bob]

On Mon, 08 May 2017 16:05:58 GMT, jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 07 May 2017 20:10:46 -0400, bob wrote:
>
>>
>> jaros' orig post claimed a victory of sorts with the house vote to
>> repeal obamacare. i'd say it's a victory for anyone who would like
>> obamacare repealed, no doubt. whether it's in the books yet, or not,
>> doesn't mean it's not a victory and step in the right direction.
>>
>> bob
>
>He wrote 'Trump is getting everything he said he would done'... so far
>he's spent tens of millions on travel expenses on your dime so he can
>consume entire weekends on the golf course while his most prominent
>executive orders are shot down... Obamacare isn't repealed/replaced, no
>wall in sight, the "swamp" is filled with billionaire goldman sachs
>types, etc. I know it's hard to face the facts, but you picked a dud.
>
>
>< cue "but Hillary" replies >

he got confirmed a supreme court justice. and obamacare is on the way
out. 3 months...

bob

[bob]

On Mon, 8 May 2017 08:51:38 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:

>On 5/7/2017 7:17 PM, bob wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 May 2017 06:48:00 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/6/2017 7:46 PM, bob wrote:

>>>> On Thu, 4 May 2017 15:53:04 -0500, stephenJ <sja...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ... go from chortling about how "Trump can't get anything done" to
>>>>> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
>>>>> awful for humanity!".
>>>>>
>>>>> Any day now?
>>>>

>>>> i recall you advising a lady named peach to abstain from voting since
>>>> she refused to vote trump. i laughed a few hours over that. :-)
>>>
>>> We're still facebook friends but she's obviously blocked any of my posts
>>>from her feed, as she never "likes" anything I post, even pictures of
>>> fuzzy animals, LOL. She's still very angry about the Hillary loss, her
>>> daughter spent time up in N. Dakota freezing with those pipeline
>>> protesters while i gloated about the cops clearing them all out so the
>>> oil could flow, LOL. :)
>>
>> lol.
>>
>> when you said, "peach, can i just get you to abstain?" i laughed my
>> ass off. you chumped that woman in the worst way and she hadn't a
>> clue!
>>
>> herb and rich have blocked me i believe - and i'm happier that way.
>
>Yes, i get nothing from them these days either though we're still
>'friends' too. Funny, because while I was extremely disappointed by
>Obama's election (twice!) i never threw tantrums and cut people off.
>
>Rich i can take or leave, i just know him from a college football forum,
>but Herb and i grew up together, I met him as a 3rd grader in 1973 and
>we were friends/classmates through high school. Worry about him too
>because he seems very troubled.

yes, his posts are those of someone very very deeply hurt by this
election. maybe in 4 yrs he'll be partying.

bob

[jdeluise]

On Thu, 11 May 2017 19:11:53 -0400, bob wrote:

> he got confirmed a supreme court justice. and obamacare is on the way
> out. 3 months...

He didn't.... the republicans had to change the rules to get him in...

[bob]

yes, and he's in. and when kennedy retires next year and ginsburg
fades away after that, maybe 3 justices in 4 years? not that i'm in
favor necessarily of whom will be chosen, but don't say "he didn't get
anything done." it'll come back to bite you very hard.

bob

[calim...@gmx.de]

No, they applied the Schumer rule. And Schumer is a DemocRat!


Max

[calim...@gmx.de]

Generally Trump is a useless clown. But him changing the face of the Supreme Court is a very valuable contribution. Evens out a lot of blunders he has already made and will surely make in the next 4 years.

Max

[Jason White]

Time to reverse the damage Oblunder caused. Continue with excellent choices to SCOTUS, Mr. Trump. Add more Scalias!

[Brian W Lawrence]

On 12/05/2017 00:11, bob wrote:

> he got confirmed a supreme court justice.

How did he do that exactly? I'm suggesting he had very little to
do with Gorsuch's confirmation.

and obamacare is on the way
> out. 3 months...

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com